That said, I still passionately believe that studying a would-be president in a variety of settings, especially answering questions from voters and reporters, is better than only seeing him behind a podium reading a staff-written speech off a teleprompter. Had John McCain—with his trademark rolling press conferences aboard his campaign bus—beaten Bush for the 2000 GOP nomination, maybe we would have returned to an era when Kennedy-esque give-and-take with the press corps was the norm. Instead, we have gone from the frozen-out Bush administration to the chilly Obama White House, in which presidential press conferences are rare—but, at least, New York Times columnists are revered.
The latest Caro volume, although it does not address this question directly, makes a strong case for the enduring value of journalistic access to political leaders. Some of the best anecdotes and shrewdest insights about Johnson come from the reporters who covered him. (In fairness, naysayers might note that many of these stories were reserved for the post-presidency LBJ oral histories or were buried in the voluminous files that Time correspondents sent to the newsmagazine’s writers in New York and never published.) And those insights undoubtedly came, in part, from the proximity reporters had to Johnson and other leading political figures of his era. After a campaign trip to Oklahoma in his quest for the Democratic nomination in June 1960, LBJ offered Chicago Daily News correspondent Peter Lisagor a ride back to Washington on his personal plane. During the entire flight, Johnson ranted about Kennedy, calling him a “scrawny little fellow with rickets,” among other epithets. As Caro goes on to write, “There were other flights with Lyndon Johnson, jacket and tie off, sitting beside other reporters pouring out his feelings about ‘the boy.’”
Somehow I do not think that level of raw emotion and naked ambition is what the rare privileged reporters who interview Romney or Obama these days get from the encounters.
What The Passage of Power defined for me is the biggest riddle about 21st century political journalism: Why, in an age of Twitter and iPhone cameras, do we know less about the inner thoughts of the men running for president than we did when reporters hit the campaign trail equipped only with their Olivetti portable typewriters and pockets filled with dimes for the pay phones?

"Why, in an age of Twitter and iPhone cameras, do we know less about the inner thoughts of the men running for president than we did when reporters hit the campaign trail equipped only with their Olivetti portable typewriters and pockets filled with dimes for the pay phones?"
Great question. Maybe personal privacy has evolutionary advantages. The more it's invaded, the more we pile on the bubble wrap.
#1 Posted by mary winter, CJR on Thu 3 May 2012 at 01:21 PM
I'd love to hear more about Walter Shapiro's "regrets" about the Bush-Gore campaign. How about a column on that? I know what I'd say as a reader.
#2 Posted by Harris Meyer, CJR on Thu 3 May 2012 at 01:55 PM
You long for LBJ all you want you left wing loser. That slimy PoS is responsible for the 55,000 names on that black marble wall in Washington, DC and for ruining the lives of thousands more of my brothers. Not enough....it's LBJ's asinine Great Society that has crippled our country with budget busting entitlements we can no longer afford...Carter wasn't the worst DUMBocrat POTUS...LBJ wins hands down.
#3 Posted by Anthony Maranzano, CJR on Thu 3 May 2012 at 04:38 PM
"Why, in an age of Twitter and iPhone cameras, do we know less about the inner thoughts of the men running for president than we did when reporters hit the campaign trail equipped only with their Olivetti portable typewriters and pockets filled with dimes for the pay phones?"
Because candidates know anything they say or do can be recorded, reproduced, and disseminated very inexpensively, but it takes many millions of dollars to be heard above the cacophony. Only candidates very skilled at controlling their message win competitive races in this environment. A candidate who is open to the press likely can't win, has no money, and needs free media to rise into contention.
#4 Posted by George B, CJR on Thu 3 May 2012 at 06:11 PM
you talk about how LBJ used to talk abut JFK and the comments he made yet you never published them. Perhaps the reason why the candidates freeze you out is that they have been burned too often by you guys. After Watergate every reported wanted to take down a president. So they just shut the doors on you.
#5 Posted by lindap, CJR on Thu 3 May 2012 at 10:41 PM
Lyndon Johnson played a critical role in the JFK assassination:
http://www.amazon.com/LBJ-The-Mastermind-JFK-Assassination/dp/1616083778/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1336103196&sr=1-1
If you want to get quickly “up to speed” on the JFK assassination, here is what to read:
1) LBJ: Mastermind of JFK’s Assassination by Phillip Nelson
2) JFK and the Unspeakable:Why He Died and Why it Matters by James Douglass
3) Brothers: the Hidden History of the Kennedy Years by David Talbot
4) The Dark Side of Camelot by Seymour Hersh
5) Family of Secrets: The Bush Dynasty by Russ Baker
6) Power Beyond Reason: The Mental Collapse of Lyndon Johnson by Jablow Hershman
7) Google the essay “LBJ-CIA Assassination of JFK” by Robert Morrow
8) Google “National Security State and the Assassination of JFK by Andrew Gavin Marshall.”
9) Google “Chip Tatum Pegasus.” Intimidation of Ross Perot 1992
10) Google “Vincent Salandria False Mystery Speech.” Read everything Vincent Salandria ever wrote.
11) Google "Unanswered Questions as Obama Annoints HW Bush" by Russ Baker
12) Google "Did the Bushes Help to Kill JFK" by Wim Dankbaar
13) Google "The Holy Grail of the JFK story" by Jefferson Morley
14) Google "The CIA and the Media" by Carl Bernstein
15) Google "CIA Instruction to Media Assets 4/1/67"
16) Google "Limit CIA Role to Intelligence" Harry Truman on 12/22/63
17) Google "Dwight Eisenhower Farewell Address" on 1/17/61
18) Google "Jerry Policoff NY Times." Read everything Jerry Policoff ever wrote about the CIA media cover up of the JFK assassination.
#6 Posted by Robert Morrow, CJR on Thu 3 May 2012 at 11:53 PM
Madeleine Duncan Brown was a mistress of Lyndon Johnson for 21 years and had a son with him named Steven Mark Brown in 1950. Madeleine mixed with the Texas elite and had many trysts with Lyndon Johnson over the years, including one at the Driskill Hotel in Austin, TX, on New Year's Eve 12/31/63.
In the early morning of January 1, 1964, just 6 weeks after the JFK assassination, Madeleine asked Lyndon Johnson:
"Lyndon, you know that a lot of people believe you had something to do with President Kennedy's assassination."
He shot up out of bed and began pacing and waving his arms screaming like a madman. I was scared!
"That's bull___, Madeleine Brown!" he yelled. "Don't tell me you believe that crap!"
"Of course not." I answered meekly, trying to cool his temper.
"It was Texas oil and those _____ renegade intelligence bastards in Washington." [said Lyndon Johnson, the new president.] [Texas in the Morning, p. 189] [LBJ told this to Madeleine in the late night of 12/31/63 in the Driskill Hotel, Austin, TX in room #254. They spent New Year’s Eve together here six weeks post JFK assassination. Room #254 was the room that LBJ used to have rendevous’ with his girlfriends – today it is known as the "Blue Room" or the "Presidential room" and rents for $600-1,000/night as a Presidential suite at the Driskill; located on the Mezzanine Level.]
#7 Posted by Robert Morrow, CJR on Thu 3 May 2012 at 11:58 PM
lol! lbj that ti\ook us into nam ...then too cowardly to run for election to finish the job? lbj - the great -failed- society? what a joke!
f)ck lbj!
#8 Posted by neal, CJR on Fri 4 May 2012 at 12:28 AM
We got mediocre reporting in the JFK/LBJ years. That's why so much information about these administrations had to come out after they were out of office. The author doesn't mention LBJ's intimidation of the Dallas Times-Herald to prevent investigation of how he got rich by using his office.
The journalistic reckoning was delayed until the hated Nixon took office. Then editors and reporters rediscovered their cojones and drove Nixon from office. But if the corruption and dirty politics of Johnson's career (Kennedy's, too) had been known, leaked and played up by the press during his administration, he would have been evicted from office, too. Suffice to say that an enabler like Bill Moyers went on to careers in the mainstream media, instead of being anathemized.
#9 Posted by Mark Richard, CJR on Wed 9 May 2012 at 04:53 PM