When reporting on political ads, reporters have a tricky line to walk. They need to think not just in terms of providing additional information to counter or affirm political claims, but also in how the ordering of information contributes to the perception of what is both important and true. This means getting the critical perspective on—and context for—claims high up in their stories, and not repeating a misleading claim without an immediate clarification for readers. While follow-up stories, like the second News piece, are useful for providing readers with a comprehensive picture of what’s happening, the presidential election is in less than a week: facts shouldn’t be spread out over a series of days. Readers need them now.
United States Project
03:00 PM - October 31, 2012
Detroit papers on Romney’s misleading Jeep ad
A campaign ad airs in Ohio but gets a close (sometimes muddled) look from Detroit reporters
#Realtalk: This isn’t another ‘golden age’ for print - But it is one for media
Social media in smaller markets - How three social media managers deal with smaller markets and more local coverage.
A rally for laid-off Sun-Times photogs - A protest Thursday morning drew about 150 picketers to the newspaper’s headquarters
Reporting, or illegal hacking - Scripps reporters are accused of violating the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act
Exchange Watch: California Dreaming - Low healthcare premiums on the West Coast were trumpeted as a big, good-news Obamacare story. But: “Compared to what?”
We’re the Uber of organ transplants
“Millennials need organ transplants that fit easily into their always-connected lifestyles”
‘What part of “Politico” do you not understand?’
A conversation about the dark art of driving the conversation
Julian Assange’s asylum stalemate no nearer resolution one year on
The Ecuadorean embassy’s celebrity refugee is used to living in what Assange likens to a space station as he battles extradition
The NSA story isn’t ‘journalistic malfeasance’
It’s a story that is evolving in real time
CJR's Guide to Online News Startups
Uptown Messenger – Hyperlocal news for a neighborhood in New Orleans
Who Owns What
The Business of Digital Journalism
A report from the Columbia University Graduate School of Journalism
Questions and exercises for journalism students.

"As Kathleen Hall Jamieson, director of the Annenberg Public Policy Center at the University of Pennsylvania, told Bloomberg Businessweek on Monday, with the ad, the Romney campaign is “inviting a false inference. It is literally accurate and inferentially false."
The contortions required to criticize the Romney campaign are a marvel. "Literally accurate and inferentially false!!"
#1 Posted by kds, CJR on Fri 2 Nov 2012 at 01:27 PM
It's really, really funny to see these "neutral watchdogs" in a Level 14 Panic Snit over the prospect of a Romney victory.
I have predicted a Romney landslide, but I freely admit it's just a gut instinct call, because I don't trust the liberal media. I will certainly be holding my nose when I vote for Romney, and it won't be the end of the world if I turn out to be wrong and Obama pulls off the election.
But GEEZ, just look at the silliness these self-proclaimed "professional journalists" are depositing here! These guys are like a hive full of drones in a beehive just before the first frost. Gloom, doom and anger.
Now THERE is recipe for electoral success!
How many more "misleading Romney" or "Romney attacks" type CJR posts are we going to see in the next three days?
And, in the interest of journalistic integrity, how many CJR articles have we seen calling out the Obama campaign's misrepresentations and exaggerations? (HINT: The answer is a very, very round number).
Get ready to type "President Romney", you "neutral watchdogs".
#2 Posted by padikiller, CJR on Fri 2 Nov 2012 at 02:11 PM
In Marchionne's own words on an earnings conference call last week, he proved the veracity of Mitt Romney's words and ad, despite his public statement attempting to prevent public outcry and auto worker panic. The Benchmark for moving manufacturing jobs overseas is $1. If it's cheaper to manufacture autos overseas with Fiat's manufacturing facilities, then they will manufacture Jeep, etc. overseas. http://nlpc.org/stories/2012/10/30/fiat%E2%80%99s-benchmark-outsource-chrysler-jeep-%E2%80%93-1-savings Americans deserve the unbiased truth on this matter before Election Day.
#3 Posted by Heather Keaton, CJR on Sun 4 Nov 2012 at 09:43 AM
"Americans deserve the unbiased truth on this matter before Election Day."
Yeah, they do. So what makes ya think they're going to get it from yet another right wing lie smelter.
http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=National_Legal_and_Policy_Center
The truth?
http://mobile.mlive.com/advannarbor/pm_115751/contentdetail.htm?contentguid=jPvnsxuj
"Since 2009, the automaker -- majority-owned by Italian automaker Fiat SpA -- has actually added more than 11,200 U.S. plants, including nearly 5,000 people at facilities involved with Jeep. "
But regardless, I see we're not talking about the Olympic uniforms made in Burma, the Massachusetts call centers sent to India, nor the Bain Capital companies outsourced to China which Romney had as much, if not more, involvement in than Obama has in Jeep.
So, good job everybody. We changed the subject. This is the conversation thus far.
Obama: "According to your record, you're an outsourcing, tax evading, leveraged buy out feasting, soul sucking, vampire."
Romney: "No U!"
Am I the only one who sees this?
#4 Posted by Thimbles, CJR on Sun 4 Nov 2012 at 06:48 PM
Talk about jeeps, not this!
#5 Posted by Thimbles, CJR on Mon 5 Nov 2012 at 03:44 PM