Journalists should be attentive to these processes, and not assume that something “going viral” is a purely organic, uncoordinated process. For example, campaigns routinely host conference calls with bloggers to coordinate messaging, sometimes create content that is designed to look like the work of amateurs, and cultivate online allies to promote content on sites such as Digg and blogs such as Daily Kos. Much of what we take to be the political production of amateurs is not what it seems.
Expectations in Charlotte are that protests like the Occupy movement will have large, loud presences during the Democratic National Convention later this year. Media outlets have the ability to amplify the messages of these new organizations, and new technologies like independent streaming video often play a large role. What kind of interplay between new sources and traditional media do you expect in the coverage of such events in North Carolina?
There is an excellent recent book on exactly this subject, Sarah Sobieraj’s Soundbitten. Sobieraj is rather pessimistic about the potential of civil society groups to contribute in meaningful ways to the professional press agenda. That said, a number of recent pieces by social movement scholars on Occupy have suggested that the movement has been very successful at setting the professional press agenda, in part by providing the rhetorical space for Democratic Party elites to embrace the movement’s rhetoric of the 99%.
In terms of the movement’s own media, no doubt activists think a lot about how they represent themselves, their message, and the channels they have for this symbolic work. And yet, movements need the professional press for mobilization and validation. Movements also need the professional press to widen the scope of conflict outside of their ideological niches, particularly with regard to the elected officials and interest groups that may share similar policy and strategic goals but are not expressly affiliated with the movements.
Your past work has explored the idea that new social media tools can level the playing field and help create a more participatory democracy. With the increasing effect of big money on campaigns, do you think any media outlets, new or old, have the power to truly level the playing field in 2012 and beyond?
I have actually always been skeptical about the possibility of new and social media tools to level the playing field. Indeed, my colleague Mike Ananny and I actually wrote a piece arguing that this is because, in large part, of financial disparities that enable producers to differentially address publics. We called for a way to subsidize citizen media production through an alternative to copyright, what we call “public domain journalism.”
The resource story is still very much the central one. Money helps get message out, although it does not wholly determine the ability of groups to do so. We argue there are still systematic disparities in terms of which voices are heard in the public sphere that often break down on class and race lines, and that new media has not necessarily brought about a qualitatively different conversation about public life or a more inclusive set of participants in this conversation. Even more, with the erosion of the resource base of the professional press, there are fewer intermediaries responsible to the general public able to fulfill the traditional watchdog function.
You’ve also explored the relationship between new media and collective action. For 2012 in North Carolina and other swing states, what kind of collective action among media do you expect? Do the characteristics of new media facilitate cooperative work? And is there a separation between “new,” independent new media and “old” new media like Huffington Post and Daily Kos? Certainly traditional and new media influence each other, but how do you measure and capture influences? How do you determine where ideas and narratives originate?

Although I am pleased by the admission that "we just do not know enough yet about these new media producers to say how they interact with one another and the paths their content travels," I am somewhat stunned that there is no concern over the looming government regulation of these very same new media producers.
I am not very smart and I saw it coming a decade ago.
Further, I am more than a little suspicious that a hunt for coordination will turn up -- coordination. Which strikes me as nothing more than fodder for the speech regulators and a terribly 20th c. concept in any case.
Sometimes there really is no story behind the story -- at least not one worth telling. And especially not one which presumes archaic motives and actors while strengthening antediluvian regulatory impulses.
#1 Posted by Jeff A. Taylor, CJR on Tue 24 Apr 2012 at 08:46 AM
Hey Jeff,
Thanks for weighing in.
I'm hoping Dan will look beyond just the ideological bloggers like the five who work for the John Locke Foundation in North Carolina and others who blog at Daily Kos. (Though I've seen real reporting on both.)
I was thinking more of the live streamers that took to the streets in New York with Occupy, in hopes of some eventual sponsorship or paid gig, or those who write for CLT Blog in Charlotte for the same purpose (as well as passion, as you mention in your linked post.)
I'd also hope that any government regulations on divulging blogger pay would first look at those who blog for 501(c)3s, which are getting tax breaks and calling themselves nonpartisan. IRS scrutiny on such organizations and their use of the word "nonpartisan" has also put obstacles in the way of new *news* nonprofits aiming to be nonpartisan in the traditional SPJ Ethics Code sense.
Of course, indie bloggers (and reporters!) still exist, and they go to the same conferences and support like-minded friends. That happens across the political spectrum. My hope is that the Kreiss research shows who's doing real *reporting* or coming up with new ideas, rather than just spinning off someone else's work with a great headline or spouting some talking points. We'll see what emerges.
Again, thanks for the comment.
#2 Posted by Andria Krewson, CJR on Tue 24 Apr 2012 at 09:35 PM