DETROIT, MI — At the conclusion of a marathon overnight session, Wisconsin legislators early this morning added a provision to the state budget that would expel the Wisconsin Center for Investigative Journalism, a nonprofit investigative journalism institute, from its offices at the University of Wisconsin in Madison. The measure also prohibits university employees “from doing any work related to the Center for Investigative Journalism as part of their duties as a UW employee.”
With the budget now cleared by the Joint Finance Committee and poised for final approval soon, journalists and educators are scrambling to preserve what is widely regarded as a successful collaborative model that both trains emerging reporters and produces high-quality investigations.
The relevant budget language—available in full on the center’s website, WisconsinWatch.org—was part of a package of amendments that was approved by the Republican-led committee 12-4 on party lines. The full spending plan now heads to the Assembly; it must also be passed by the Senate and signed by Gov. Scott Walker, a Republican.
Founded in 2009, the WCIJ is a nonprofit, nonpartisan outlet whose recent projects include an exploration of frac sand mining, an investigation into hormone disrupters in water, a series on nursing home neglect, and a look at the impact of legislation on abortion access. The center—about which CJR has written enthusiastically—receives no direct university funding; its $400,000 budget is supported primarily by foundations.
But the partnership between the center and the university’s School of Journalism and Mass Communication is tight-knit. The center has access to two small offices at the school for use by its four-member professional staff and four UW reporting interns, plus a third room for summer interns. That internship program, which has involved nearly two dozen students to date, is robust: it offers paid opportunities to do public-service journalism, several interns have won awards for their WCIJ work, and many have gone on to professional journalism careers.
The center also hosts special events on campus, and its staff members reportedly teach and guest-lecture at university courses. Though no J-school faculty work at the center, professors say the proximity and collaborations give educators a window into an alternative model of media sustainability. Together, SJMC and WCIJ won The Associated Press’s first-ever Innovator of the Year for College Students award last fall.
Lucas Graves, an assistant professor at the school (and an occasional CJR contributor), said it was too early to say what effect the legislative language might have on the internship program.
“But I really can’t stress enough what a huge asset it’s been to have a working newsroom operating independently right in the middle of the department, and what a loss it would be to see them go,” Graves added. “They do the kind of investigative work that a lot of career journalists never get the chance to, and which has been so hard hit by the newspaper crisis. That makes them a really unique resource for training journalism students.”
Before last night, there was little sense that this peaceable partnership was in peril. Greg Downey, department chair of the journalism school, did not hear about the motion that targets the collaboration until about twelve hours before it passed, and many staff did not learn about it until this morning
“It took me by surprise,” Downey told me. “We did not know this targeted attack on the center was coming.” He said he does not know who added the legislative language, or why. “We’re still dealing with this in real time.”
Andy Hall, the center’s executive director, could not be immediately reached for comment. But he told Romenesko and the alt-weekly site City Pages, “we were blindsided.”

And reporters throughout the state should be asking the members of the legislature who supported this amendment why? They should determine with specificity what the impetus was for this. In other words, the elected officials should be held accountable. Here is reporting that helps the state, helps students and helps the public. The reason state legislators are opposed to that is????
#1 Posted by Karl Idsvoog, CJR on Wed 5 Jun 2013 at 06:49 PM
Alas! Does the awesomeness of Wisconsin Republicans know no bounds?
#2 Posted by Edward Ericson Jr., CJR on Thu 6 Jun 2013 at 03:27 PM
Good idea Karl. Of course the reason is because they are evil MFs and should be punished severely.
#3 Posted by steve sexauer, CJR on Thu 6 Jun 2013 at 05:16 PM
Well, clearly this Investigative Journalism Center is attempting to undermine the foundation of predatory capitalism with its investigations into Frac Sand Mining and hormones in the water. Jeez, can't a corporation just blow up the bluffs on the Mississippi River without a lot of nosy journalists poking around and reporting on the devastating effects?
#4 Posted by Alice Swanson, CJR on Fri 7 Jun 2013 at 11:43 AM
You might also want to mention the "Dracula" congress tactics being employed by the cheese-head Machiavelli's:
http://www.esquire.com/_mobile/blogs/politics/scott-walker-expells-investigative-journalists-from-wisconsin-060513
"You may note the fact that the Center got voted out of the capital at six in the morning. This may seem an odd time to be voting on anything, but you have not reckoned with the way the cheese-head caudillos have been operating these days. The session didn't even start until almost two in the morning, and there was a lot of mischief done in the dark of night."
This is the new normal, or actually the old normal since it's been operative since the 90's if you've been paying attention.
#5 Posted by Thimbles, CJR on Fri 7 Jun 2013 at 12:42 PM
The Wisconsin government should have limited itself to seizing this organization's telephone records -- then it would have escaped CJR's notice.
#6 Posted by Tom T., CJR on Fri 7 Jun 2013 at 03:25 PM
The simple explanation is that investigative journalism is now regarded as partisan Liberal attack, since it tends to expose GOP and corporate wrong-doing. There may be an equally plausible explanation, but I confess I don't see one at the moment.
#7 Posted by JohnR, CJR on Fri 7 Jun 2013 at 03:37 PM
JohnR
Even though the nation is bombarded with Obama scandals, journalists are overwhelmingly liberal and Democratic and it shows in their reporting.
That said, why should any outside organization get state-funded office space?
#8 Posted by Dan Gainor, CJR on Fri 7 Jun 2013 at 05:32 PM
"Even though the nation is bombarded with Obama scandals"
Of which maybe one is real (the surveillance one which you righties thought was treasonous to talk about when the 'war president' had an R on his duncecap).
"That said, why should any outside organization get state-funded office space?"
I don't know, perhaps because it's not really the state's business how the university runs itself? I mean if the university chooses to allocate some office space to a non-profit venture for some benefit that it derives in the training and paid internships its students receive, why does the state get to single out one organization's contract with the university?
http://www.wisconsinwatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/Facilities-Use-Agreement-UW-WCIJ.pdf
Are you going to get upset about the use of state funded garden sheds used to store a contracted company's lawn mowers next?
And I sure hope none of the independent newspapers associated with John Karl's, James O'keefe's, and Ann Coulter's Coligiette Network use any state funded resources. That might tie a free thinking person in knots.
Hell, not even Charles Sykes can support the d-bagginess Wisconsin republicans are displaying here.
http://www.wisconsinwatch.org/2013/06/06/petty-vindictive-dumb-conservative-host-charlie-sykes-defends-the-center/
But, as always, the heartland climate denialist and MRC flying monkey, Danny Gainor steps up.
#9 Posted by Thimbles, CJR on Sat 8 Jun 2013 at 01:35 PM
At least 'Danny' Gainor posts under his own name - making Thimbles' characteristically ad hominem dissertatation unintentionally revealing on more than one level.
#10 Posted by Mark Richard, CJR on Wed 19 Jun 2013 at 10:11 AM