In June, when the Supreme Court ruled on Dobbs v. Jackson Womenâs Health Organization, newsrooms responded in vastly different ways. Several outlets vowed to pay for employeesâ abortions across state lines; MSNBC broadcast for nearly four hours without an ad break; Fox warned of activistsâ ârage.â Some editors angsted over bias; Gannett warned staff not to post, or even like, anything on social media âthat could appear to indicate support for any side or group.â Meanwhile, across the country, state lawmakers were making it increasingly difficult to receive care. People who had been working in abortion services for years were suddenly doused with media attention. Sources felt vulnerable in ways they hadnât before. Amid widespread panic, journalists needed to convey, among other things, that many poor and minority communities had lacked abortion access for a long time. There has never been consensus in the press about how to cover abortion in America. Yet doing our job well has the highest stakes.
The Abortion Issue

Emergency upon Emergency
How the press reacted to Dobbs—and what comes next

A Matter of Necessity
Shefali Luthra covers abortion for The 19th at a crucial moment

Everywhere and Nowhere
Notes from a parachuting national reporter on abortionâs local stories

Peer to Peer
News you can use, via Google Doc

Sources on Sourcing
Six people weigh the risks and benefits of talking with the media

Out of Control
How a search for answers about reproductive health can lead you down a tunnel of misinformation