Join us
the kicker

Covering Flip-Flops (A How-To)

Over at Time.com, Michael Scherer (who once worked here at CJR) observes: Every day, flip-flop charges bang up against the political press like moths on a...
July 3, 2008

Sign up for The Media Today, CJR’s daily newsletter.

Over at Time.com, Michael Scherer (who once worked here at CJR) observes:

Every day, flip-flop charges bang up against the political press like moths on a screen door. And we let some of them in, sometimes with the unexamined conceit that any shift in position is a window into the candidate’s lack of character, toughness or principle…

So how do we cull the moths to separate bogus flip-flop charge from valuable one?

With Scherer’s homemade moth repellant — in the form of “three questions that matter most” that, I presume, he believes he and his fellow campaign reporters should ask themselves when facing a flip-flop and a deadline. “Is the change substantial, or superficial? Was it done for political expediency? Was it done to fool the voting public?”

I am all for political reporters pausing to ask themselves a few questions before automatically writing up the flip-flop du jour, but the whole assigning of motives (why this flip? what motivated that flop?) can be tricky, mind-reading business.

Has America ever needed a media defender more than now? Help us by joining CJR today.

Liz Cox Barrett is a writer at CJR.