Tonight marks the airing of the last edition of Bill Moyers Journal on PBS stations nationwide.
An online tribute page prepared by Thirteen/WNET features thoughts on Moyers’s legacy from Dan Rather, Tavis Smiley, Stephen Colbert, and others, and allows viewers to add their own comments. It’s a fond gesture to mark the departure of the iconic journalist from his regularly scheduled weekly television show.
Such a caveat seems necessary, given that we don’t expect Moyers to vanish from the public stage. He’s long been a prolific author, speech-maker, and host of TV specials, and there’s every reason to think, and hope, that will continue.
Moyers is a long-time friend of CJR. A few years ago, the Schumann Foundation, with which he is affiliated, was a major funder of the magazine.
He was also the subject of a short profile in our 40th anniversary issue, published in November/December 2001, which featured a close look at forty seminal journalists—one for each year of CJR’s existence to that point. Moyers was chosen to represent 1974; the piece, headlined “A Serious Voice” and written by Scott Sherman, is republished below.
In 1948, when he was fourteen years old, Bill Moyers heard Lyndon Johnson give a rousing speech at a courthouse in Marshall, Texas. Without a megaphone or a loudspeaker, LBJ mesmerized the crowd. “I remember the sheer presence of the man,” Moyers has recalled. “And I thought, ‘That’s what power is. And this man is reaching this audience. And he’s got this audience. And he’s telling this audience something that’s very important.’ ” Years later, through a different medium—television—Moyers would achieve a similar kind of power, and he has yet to abuse it. Moyers’s conversational ease, his earnest delivery, his fierce intelligence—all of it has transformed him into our leading television intellectual, and a worthy successor to Edward R. Murrow.
From a modest upbringing in Hugo, Oklahoma, Moyers rose to become deputy director of the Peace Corps, special assistant and press secretary to President Johnson (who once referred to Moyers as “my vice president in charge of everything”), and publisher of Newsday. In the early 1970s, Moyers launched his national television career, first with Bill Moyers’ Journal on PBS, and then in 1974 as a special correspondent with CBS Reports. Moyers eventually wanted greater editorial freedom, and in 1986 he founded his own company, Public Affairs Television. His oeuvre includes Bill Moyers’ A World of Ideas, Joseph Campbell and the Power of Myth with Bill Moyers, Amazing Grace, The Secret Government, Marshall, Texas: Marshall, Texas, The Vanishing Family: Crisis in Black America, The Arab World, Sports for Sale, and Facing Hate with Elie Wiesel.
Many of these programs were accompanied by books on the subjects. If Moyers has been an invaluable presence on television, he has also been one of our most astute press critics. “The biggest change in my thirty years in broadcasting,” he said at a recent speech at the National Press Club, “has been the shift of content from news about government to consumer-driven information and celebrity features.” “It matters,” Moyers affirmed, “whether we’re over at the Puffy Combs trial, checking out what Jennifer Lopez was wearing the night she ditched him, or whether we’re on the Hill, seeing who’s writing the new bankruptcy law, or overturning workplace safety rules, or buying back standards for allowable levels of arsenic in our drinking water.” Concluded Moyers, quoting the late Martha Gellhorn: “Serious, careful, honest journalism is essential, not because it is a guiding light but because it is a form of honorable behavior.” Serious journalism is Moyers’s legacy to us. — S.S.
The silent majority has lost its voice and greatest supporter. We will miss you, Bill.
#1 Posted by Ann Timmerman, CJR on Fri 30 Apr 2010 at 09:50 PM
It is a sad day for those of us that want to know and understand the truth.
#2 Posted by Rich, CJR on Fri 30 Apr 2010 at 10:39 PM
It's also sad that PBS's Now got canceled. The slower narrative approach of both programs were excellent contrasts to the sound bite flip book of the immediate journalism industry that so lacks historical context.
#3 Posted by Thimbles, CJR on Sat 1 May 2010 at 01:44 AM
An insufferable blowhard, using my tax dollars to push his hard-left agenda.
Good riddance!
#4 Posted by jLD, CJR on Sat 1 May 2010 at 10:46 AM
One of the few shows really worth watching for some truthful journalism. Why is it going away?(Bill Moyer's Journal). I really already feel the void.
#5 Posted by patsyann0, CJR on Sat 1 May 2010 at 10:59 AM
JLD must be a tea bagger, otherwise known as the dumber than dog sh*t party.
#6 Posted by bob, CJR on Sat 1 May 2010 at 01:06 PM
I second JLD's sentiment. Moyers is a sanctimonious, self righteous prick. Perhaps he could spend some of new found time on some old purists of his: gay witch hunts and outing journalists who had “communist” connections.
Bill Moyers, proof positive that being a good liberal means never having to say you are sorry.
#7 Posted by Mike H, CJR on Sun 2 May 2010 at 10:01 AM
I probably shouldn't ask but... Why all the hate? I mean if you put put Bill Moyers's stuff up against Dick Gregory's, Keith Olberman's, George Stephanopolous's, George Will's, etc... when it comes to opinion or journalism, his work was a class above.
And three to five classes above anything done by fox news.
So I don't understand the hate. It goes beyond reason for a guy who's made a career on reasonable reporting and reasonable and respectful interviews. Oh well, nobody is to everybody's taste, I guess.
#8 Posted by Thimbles, CJR on Mon 3 May 2010 at 02:48 AM
I could never watch him; my gag reflex always struggled with it.
#9 Posted by JayJay, CJR on Mon 3 May 2010 at 09:07 AM
I find it hard to understand such hagiography from an organ that prides itself on critical review. CJR really can't come up with anything but fawning praise for Bill Moyer's Journal? Maybe it's because the show mirrored their own pretentions for the journalistic enterprise - who knows. The article reads like a product of blinkered groupthink.
#10 Posted by binkless, CJR on Mon 3 May 2010 at 04:05 PM
What the hell? People, if you are going to make a complaint, make it specific. "He's a sanctimonious orifice who's blatant bias ruined several generations of "viewers like you". PBS? More like BPS - Bill-Moyers Personal Suckfest."
"So what instance did you object to? What Episode jumps out at you as the worst? Elucidate."
"No."
Well then fine. Bill Moyers sucks, but the journal was awesome:
http://www.pbs.org/moyers/journal/04232010/profile.html
#11 Posted by Thimbles, CJR on Mon 3 May 2010 at 04:31 PM
So what instance did you object to? What Episode jumps out at you as the worst? Elucidate
Well, his softball damage control interview with Reverend Jeremiah "GOD DAMN AMERICA AND ITS ZIONIST AGENT WHO RELEASED HIV INTO THE BLACK COMMUNITY TO COMMIT GENOCIDE" Wright sticks out in my mind.
I was also stuck by an article he wrote in early 2005 "There is no tomorrow", in which he simply regurgitated a Grist article, replete with some of the most ridiculous allegations on the Bush administration’s actions related to new source review requirements, diesel truck emissions and James Watt's non-quote about cutting trees and the rapture.
And then there’s the dirty tricks campaign against MLK, the Daisy add, and his using the FBI to investigate the sexual proclivities of political opponents …. My favorite part about that was he claimed the incriminating letter dug up during the Church commission was a CIA forgery designed to damage his reputation …. That is before he realized just how ludicrous that sounded and fessed up.
But, it’s like I said, being a good liberal means never having to say you are sorry.
#12 Posted by Mike H, CJR on Mon 3 May 2010 at 08:52 PM
Well, I can't speak for his conduct in the LBJ administration except to say that his conduct was likely shaped out of his proximity to the JFK assassination and the turbulence that followed. The Vietnam era was a difficult and painful time to go through and figures like Moyers and John Dean, of the Nixon Years, have managed to rehabilitate themselves.
The Jeremiah Wright video was an interesting look into how Wright practiced his beliefs and what he meant in those sound bite sermons which were played over and over again.
I read the "There's no tomorrow".
http://www.truthout.org/article/bill-moyers-the-delusional-is-no-longer-marginal
What did you object to?
The Watt quote was a mistake and Watt's admits Moyers apologized for it,
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/05/20/AR2005052001333.html
But Watts also said this in Senate testimony:
"I do not know how many future generations we can count on before the Lord returns; whatever it is we have to manage with a skill to leave the resources needed for future generations."
And though he said "I never said it. Never believed it. Never even thought it. I know no Christian who believes or preaches such error. The Bible commands conservation -- that we as Christians be careful stewards of the land and resources entrusted to us by the Creator."
The bible also says that "by their fruits ye shall know them", and the fruits of his tenure as secretary of the interior was one where mining and oil drilling were highly unregulated and every effort was made to undermine environmental conservation.
And what influenced this perjurer's thinking on the subject? Listen to what he said:
"If the troubles from environmentalists cannot be solved in the jury box or at the ballot box, perhaps the cartridge box should be used."
And:
"Watt, who pushed for more energy development on public lands as
President Reagan's interior secretary, says Vice President Dick
Cheney's recent speech placing production ahead of conservation is just
what he was recommending in the early 1980s.
"Everything Cheney's saying, everything the president's saying -
they're saying exactly what we were saying 20 years ago, precisely,"
Watt said in an interview with The Denver Post from his winter home in
Wickenberg, Ariz. "Twenty years later, it sounds like they've just
dusted off the old work."
"Any reasonable, halfway intelligent person is going to come to the
same conclusion: you've got to have more oil, you've got to have more
coal, you've got to have more of everything," Watt said. "You've got to
have more conservation too, but conservation and solar energy and wind
energy - they're just teeny infant portions. You're not going to run
the world with solar energy by the year 2001, or 2002 or 2010.""
So here you have a man who claims to be slandered because he's a conversationalist at heart, but thinks environmentalists should be shot (only as a last resort) and that public lands should be exploited (only as a first). He's not a very sympathetic figure but it was wrong for Moyers not to check the quote.
The body of work he's done for PBS remains still some of the best TV I've ever seen.
And I've seen Oliver North, G.G liddy, and Karl Rove say they're sorry.
#13 Posted by Thimbles, CJR on Tue 4 May 2010 at 03:20 PM
Although I probably disagreeded with most of his views, I enjoyed the civil discourse of ideas he presented. It reminded me of a time when we all epressed our views with respect and civility towards those with whom we disagreed.
#14 Posted by Wade, CJR on Sun 9 May 2010 at 09:03 AM