Last month I was reporting a story on the opening of a mango warehouse in Haiti’s countryside when a fellow reporter got a phone call from his editor: forget about mangoes and get to Saint Marc, where an unknown disease had already killed forty-four people. We arrived at the town’s hospital an hour later. Hundreds of people—men, women, and children—lay on the ground with IVs in their arms. Those who could stand waited in long lines to see a doctor, but some were already in shock and dying by the time someone got to them. By the end of the day, the death toll had risen to 135, and though the Haitian government had not yet confirmed it, nearly every doctor at the hospital identified the cause to me as cholera.
Over the last month, American news outlets have followed the cholera epidemic as the disease has spread throughout Haiti and into Port au Prince, where over one million earthquake victims are still living in tent camps with little or no sanitation and access to clean water. The presence of cholera in these overcrowded camps will undoubtedly have horrific consequences. Cholera is not endemic to Haiti and speculation in the press of the source of the outbreak has at times taken the tone of a Michael Crichton thriller with a whodunit twist. (A yet unproven theory is that United Nations peacekeeping troops from South Asia brought the deadly bacteria into the country.) More frequently, the outbreak is explained the same way so many of Haiti’s problems are by the American media: simply a consequence of the nation’s “crushing” or “devastating” poverty, with little context or investigation.
Is America’s news coverage of the cholera epidemic, which has now taken over one thousand lives, yet another example of an industry reliance on “disaster porn”? In the New York Daily News, Haiti-based journalist Ansel Herz pointed out that CNN returned to Haiti for the second time since the January 12 earthquake to cover the cholera outbreak—but in a typically lurid fashion, with little attention to the underlying causes.* “With CNN lagging behind its more partisan competitors, disaster porn is now the news channel’s bread and butter,” wrote Herz. “But it has managed to entirely miss the big-picture story: The cholera outbreak itself is a symptom of failed foreign policies and organizations that have left the Haitian people as poor as ever and disconnected from the mechanisms of their own development.”
CNN’s twenty-four-hour coverage of the aftermath of Haiti’s earthquake, which took an estimated 300,000 lives, doubled the network’s viewership. This coverage undoubtedly played a role in the America public’s response to the tragedy—one out of two Americans donated money to aid organizations. But little reporting has been done since then that asks how exactly that money is being spent, holds aid organizations accountable to their promises, or investigates the American government’s development and economic policies in the country. These policies, argues sociologist Alex Dupuy, have kept Haiti frozen in a destructive cycle of aid-dependence and exploitation for decades, stripping Haiti of its self-determination. “For the level of tragedy, no one’s really being very honest,” said Michael Fairbanks, a development expert, of the American and international community’s rhetoric about Haiti since the earthquake. “[Haitians] are constantly put into the position of adolescence and being infantilized so they can prey on the charity from the rest of the hemisphere.”
The longer American news outlets ignore these critical and complex issues, the easier it will become to view their occasional jaunts to Haiti with cynicism: it’s an convenient place to get B-roll of tragedy and disaster. Their coverage increases viewership, but without a moral component of responsibility towards Haitians themselves over the long-term, such coverage is basically exploitative. And over time, superficial reporting on Haiti’s problems—which plays a role in soliciting charitable donations from Americans-will arguably make the media culpable in the very system of aid-dependence and misguided development policies that help keep Haiti poor.
- 1
- 2
Bravo and thank you for this article! I concur especially with the remarks made by Claude Gilles: where's the reporting on HOW the money donated is being used and WHAT plan is in place to get Haiti back on its feet? In truth, Haiti has never been allowed to get on its feet, so using the phrase "back on its feet" is very inaccurate.
More reporting, please, on the next steps rather than the usual loop of how Haiti is the "poorest in the western hemisphere"!
#1 Posted by Myriam Breton Jones, CJR on Sat 20 Nov 2010 at 07:06 AM
it has been interesting to see reporting from the real news end, and from the "disaster voyeur" end in Haiti. Ansel Herz has done a good job with recent pieces. Reed Lindsay's work has always been good. Al Jazeera has been credible. The same bifurcation in quality of work happens in the NGO world. Somefoster perpetual dependency and infantilization while others promote community development and integration of Haitian run services. As a frequent Haiti visitor for the past 4 years, there is no future in either infantilization or voyeurism. It will have to be good old hard work and honest reporting of real news.
#2 Posted by john evans, CJR on Sat 20 Nov 2010 at 03:18 PM
I went to Haiti with a medical team (I'm a former paramedic and radio/newspaper/magazine reporter) after the quake and found myself having the same reaction to descriptions of some of the photos our team leader had taken in the immediate aftermath. I won't even describe them - my first reaction was to say that those pictures should probably never been seen. I certainly don't want to, even though I can understand peoples' fascination with them. I can't stand to watch broadcast news about Haiti (or the wars, which killed a member of my extended family). It seems so clearly to be primarily about entertainment, not reporting.
#3 Posted by Nick Arnett, CJR on Sun 21 Nov 2010 at 12:27 PM
Yes, it probably will. Because without porn many deprived men will go out on the streets and rape all the women and then a load of money will be needed to be spent building prisons and imprisoning these rapists and sentencing them to death.
Mojoblast
#4 Posted by jackie saif, CJR on Fri 3 Dec 2010 at 06:17 AM