The Rupert Murdoch who appeared before the British Parliament was nothing like the Rupert Murdoch of reputation. But even that Rupert Murdoch is not the full version. For some insight into that it helps read to read his annual letter to stockholders, which helps explain how he sees News Corporation. Or at least how he saw it before the scandal.
It was just about a year ago that Rupert Murdoch sat down to tell News Corporation stockholders in his annual letter that the company would be “squarely in the news spotlight” in the coming year. At the time, he said, it would be because of the company’s “bold, strategic moves.”
Addressed appropriately, since he owns 38 percent of the company, to “dear fellow stockholders,” the letter was its usual mix of business bravado and media insight. His letters may not have the cachet of Warren Buffett’s letters, but they are still some of the best written shareholder letters of any Media CEO. In what now sounds like a prophetic statement, Murdoch wrote, “When you have been in business as long as we have, you are no stranger to adversity or instability.”
At the time he was referring, of course, to the financial challenges facing the media industry, which Murdoch’s company was able to overcome, raising revenues 8 percent to a whopping $32.8 billion. The journalistic challenges, which would later become financial challenges, from the News of the World hacking scandal and beyond were confined to stories in competing newspapers, mainly The Guardian. In the letter he talked about many of the corporation’s worldwide media enterprises, but there was no mention of the News of the World even though it had once been the financial bedrock of his empire.
In contrast, he talks about The Sun, one of “our popular UK titles,” having its highest advertising revenue year ever and The Wall Street Journal growing in circulation. BSkyB, in particular, would get several mentions because, Murdoch says, he knew how “incredibly important” BSkyB and its Pay TV model could be with “the right leadership.” In part because of the pending BSkyB deal, News Corporation maintained a nearly $9 billion cash balance at the end of the year.
In the letter he talks about sitting down each summer to write the letter “to you,” clearly implying he writes the letters himself, quite probably at home and quite possibly at his Fifth Avenue triplex penthouse in New York City, one of four homes he owns around the world. As he reflected on the performance of the company, headquartered a short way away on the Avenue of the Americas, Murdoch says the thing that resonates most with him is the “consistency” of the company strategy and the “clarity” of its operations.
Some time after writing the letter, later in the summer, Murdoch would address the New York Forum in what BusinessWeek called his usual “fine, ornery form”—a stark contrast to the Murdoch who subsequently appeared before Parliament last week. That same “ornery form” can be seen in his letter. Just as at the forum, he berates the government in the US and elsewhere about the “unpredictability” of the global economic recovery because of the sovereign debt pressures, soaring deficits, and US unemployment.
But he focuses most of his attention on the “even more unpredictable” technological transformation taking place in the media industry, a transformation that, in typical Murdoch fashion, he sees more as an opportunity than a challenge. Indeed, much of his letter focuses on the need to marry technology and content, telling stockholders, “Our media companies must find our media talent partnering with our engineering talent to create new consumer experiences.”
He goes on to say that we live in an ‘era of innovation a digital renaissance’ which he adds in typical Murdoch hyperbole, “is bringing us closer to a global meritocracy than at any time in human history.” In the end, he says, News Corporation will be in the forefront of that move, maintaining its “leadership position for decades to come.”

I despise you Brits with your Rupert Murdoch gossip, BS journalism. If it wasn’t for you fools making the Murdoch’s rich, we wouldn’t have FOX Spin …ahhhh, I mean News ruining the USA! The Murdoch’s and their cronies are not sitting in a dungeon is testament to how bad things are in England. How a whole country can be played for fools is beyond me but it’s spilling over to the States. (as one can tell from the Tea Party/Birther suckers)
Get this… Brits sent their criminals to Australia and then the Aussies sent back their biggest con man back to England. Rupert Murdoch came to you nation, bought off your police, politicians, news media… then he bend the English people over and violated them. I guess they liked it because the pussies don’t seem very angry.
Ohhhhh come on… I’ll bet the farm right now that the Murdoch’s set up the shaving cream pie incident. That’s what they’re good at, distract the public with petty drama or fear mongering.
I say hang Murdoch and his silver spoon, trust fund baby son, jail all his generals, trash his newspapers/TV Evil Empire and get to the business of reporting actual news. How do all you so-called journalists sell-outs live with yourselves? It’s ACCOUNTABILITY TIME! See cyberbitchslap2.blogspot.com to join the fight.
#1 Posted by Spo101, CJR on Thu 28 Jul 2011 at 11:55 AM
All the breast thumping about privacy and human rights is just in time. The next big thing to hit us all if we but see it coming is Monarch Programming.
The evil that men do has a name now, and in the future we will probably not even be able to look back in anger at what had passed us by.
Go on, google "Monarch Programming", maybe add another word, maybe, say, "ruby" and if you do that, maybe use google images, not web search, just to spice up what might be something of a shock when you have thought past the slave nation represented with all the Murdoch entrapped sex kittens.....(I am only just joking on this one).....
#2 Posted by Tim Baber, CJR on Thu 28 Jul 2011 at 05:14 PM
love the above comment, right on!
i would just like to recount briefly an encounter with one of rupert's u.s. henchmen, the very one who wrote the "son of sam" stories for the n.y. post, steve donleavy, a kiwi ex rugby player who it turned out had gouged eyes and bitten off ears during his days as a reporter in asia and hooking up with rupert. i was the publisher of urizen books and had done Wilfred Burchett's [an Aussie] GRASSHOPPERS AND ELEPHANTS which was Wilfred's very much inside tunnels account of being with the Vietcong up and down the Ho Chi Minh trail. I recall going out at 4 pm for my pickme-up Mars bar and seeing Wilfred's photo, pudgy faced, on the front page of the NY Post: "Torturer of G.I's in New York." My heart sank as I chewed my Mars bar and walked the two blocks back to my office: "No, Wilfred, please no," I prayed and then called the White House communications director, Hoving, who said, "Nonsense", he has a visa, he was part of the peace process, he was one of Uncle Ho's gobetween." I had invited a lot of journalists to a by then famous restaurant where i had been going when it was just a hole in the wall on 2nd Avenue, Elaine's, lots of journalists who had been in touch with Wilfred during their mutual Vietnam days. David Halberstam, David Arnett, a table full, the big table and we were having a good time, I was just a kid then, the year is 1978, when Donleavy barges in and ruins the evening. Elaine Kaufman, the recently deceased owner tells me I might want to leave through the kitchen, Donleavy has his Post photographer waiting outside ["Torturer of G.I.'s at Elaine's"]. I make the mistake of taking Mama's advice and leave through the kitchen when Donleavy and photographer barge into the kitchen and he pushes me aside, who has interposed himself between him and Wilfred and his Bulgarian wife. That is called assault and I called the police and took Donleavy to court and the judge said you can read Donleavy's record, Wilfred had provided it, into the court record or you have to bring all the witnesses to court, three times, and I will give you a conviction on the order off leaving the cover off a garbage can [a priceless detail, no?]. I took the judge up on his offer. As Donleavy and his Post lawyer and I left Part One Leonard Street court, where we had been called first among the hundreds that morning, Donleavy said: "Aren't you glad I didn't bite off your ear." A sense of humor then makes me forgive Steve Donleavy and his toupe, but not a publisher who employs his likes. The post never ran the photo "Torturer of G.I.'s Slinking out of Elaine's Kitchen.". Here is a link to the story at a posting about Elaine's on my http://artscritic.blogspot.com/
#3 Posted by MICHAEL ROLOFF, CJR on Thu 28 Jul 2011 at 05:24 PM
Michael, Have you posted this before at this site? I am reading your copy, because, let's face it, anyone who is important enough for an all-caps name is a must read.
Have you heard of "the paragraph"? It is a useful way to structure information.
#4 Posted by Clayton Burns, CJR on Thu 28 Jul 2011 at 06:21 PM