A few days ago, I found myself a visitor in Lincoln, Nebraska, a city where I cut my teeth as a reporter. So with a bit of time on my hands, I decided to do some reporting there again, this time to see if the now-infamous Cornhusker Kickback was still on residents’ minds, and to get a read on Sen. Ben Nelson’s political future. I headed in the direction of Lincoln’s historic district, where the old Burlington railroad station has morphed into a banquet hall, and hipsters and seniors drink mochas in buildings that once housed saddlery shops. Plenty of people wanted to chat.
The Cornhusker Kickback still grates on Nebraskans. A refresher here: To secure Nelson’s crucial sixtieth vote to pass the health reform bill before Christmas, Senate majority leader Harry Reid bestowed a $100 million gift on Nebraskans and their Democratic senator, which would have helped the state cover its share of Medicaid costs for low-income Nebraskans.
No doubt that money would have helped the state treasury, but Nebraskans, despite their reputation for fiscal conservatism, would have none of it. The deal offended the sensibilities of the state’s residents, who apparently don’t care much for hand shakes in back rooms. The kickback made the state, which has one of the lowest mortgage default rates and where people still pay cash, look bad. Nelson has taken the heat ever since. Although Congress struck the provision from the final legislation, people were pessimistic about Nelson’s future.
“I see it as detrimental in getting him reelected,” Ed, a driver for UPS told me. “He singled out Nebraska and made people wonder what was going on under the table.” Thirty-one-year old Jeff Melichar, who was working at his family’s Phillips 66 station on P Street, put it this way: “We even had the governor of California knocking us.” Melichar, a Democrat, voted for Nelson, but he added: “This is not going to go away. Any Republican could stand on the corner and point Cornhusker Kickback and make him sound as shady as possible, and that’s it. I wish it wasn’t the case, but he damaged himself. The fact he voted ‘yes’ on the bill ended his political career in Nebraska.”
The health reform bill was not popular with people I talked to, whether they were young, old, or in-between. Nelson’s vote was “an absolute betrayal,” said seventy-two-year-old architect Robert Hanna. “He said he wouldn’t sign a bill that would increase the deficit and include illegal aliens which the bill does. Because of his action, I won’t vote for a Democrat ever again, under any circumstances.”
Hanna, a self-described independent, was so angry he couldn’t stop talking. “It’s not morally conscionable to increase the deficit and give assistance to illegal immigrants,” he said. When I told him the bill would not provide subsides for those folks, he had an answer: “They are going to try to make all those illegals now legal so they would be covered.” Hanna emphasized that the general population of the state is opposed to health reform. As for the Cornhusker Kickback—“that kickback hurt the image of Nebraska. I hear it referred to on almost any radio program.”
Jon, who wouldn’t give his last name, was cleaning the glass doors at Old Chicago, a beer and pizza joint. Although Jon, who is twenty-one, couldn’t vote the last time Ben Nelson ran for Senate, he said he would not vote for him if he ran in 2012. “I didn’t want him to vote for the health care package. I heard about Congressmen ignoring people in their districts,” he said. Why did he oppose the health bill? “Taxes might go up, and President Obama wanted to ram it through.”
- 1
- 2
I've got to confess that, reading all the opinions expressed in this article, it does seem to me that Nebraskans must be, by and large, morons.
Robert Hanna clearly refuses to let mere facts get in the way of his preconceptions. Jon's reasons for opposing healthcare reform boil down to “Taxes might go up, and President Obama wanted to ram it through” -- which suggests he has the cognitive powers of a two-year-old. And Neloson himself is hardly the finest advertisement for the state.
#1 Posted by JG, CJR on Thu 15 Apr 2010 at 11:09 PM
The lack of intellect expressed by the health care commentary of the 'man in the street' in Omaha, is the fault of a terrible presentation by congress coupled with a "lazy" media. Todays journalist accepts balanced reporting of sound bites as a panacea, paying no attention that a lie told often enough becomes gospel.
#2 Posted by Hartley Lord, CJR on Fri 16 Apr 2010 at 09:34 AM
The person who wrote the above comment and is signed JG and is calling Nebraskans Morons, is totally out of line and their comments are as offensive as are the politics in DC. Nebraskans are hard working, honest, and dedicated Americans. The Morons in this country are those in DC. Before it is over we will all want to live in the culture of Nebraska. I miss those folks as I have been gone for several years, but I hope their commitment to honestry and to their Country becomes contagious. I hope we can survive as a nation for another 3 years.
#3 Posted by Joe Gallagher, CJR on Fri 16 Apr 2010 at 12:25 PM
Ms. Lieberman wrote: "No doubt that money would have helped the state treasury, but Nebraskans, despite their reputation for fiscal conservatism, would have none of it."
padikiller responds: Witness the fundamental disconnect between the "professional journalists" of the world and the man on the street...
Only in CJR-Land would snatching a $100,000,000 from the federal treasury in order to puff up the state treasury be equated to any sort of "fiscal conservatism".
Nelson is toast. Reid is toast.
It's not complicated. The majority of Americans do not support this collectivist power-grab in the name of "health reform". Not it Lincoln. Not in Las Vegas. Not even in Boston.
Barring a miracle, November will spell the beginning of the end for the Great Chicago Hope.
#4 Posted by padikiller, CJR on Sat 17 Apr 2010 at 02:35 PM
Some enlightened liblab will have to explain to me why we are supposed to be so outraged by private money in politics, but bribery with public money is just business as usual. The indictment includes lazy reporters who didn't see that to the public, bribery to try to buy votes with tax dollars is regarded as even worse than bribery with stockholders money. The more sophisticated Tea Partiers get it, while the naive and narrowly-focused lamestream urban media has to be hit over the head with public unhappiness before they grasp such matters.
#5 Posted by Mark Richard, CJR on Sat 17 Apr 2010 at 03:32 PM
Some enlightened liblab will have to explain to me why we are supposed to be so outraged by private money in politics, but bribery with public money is just business as usual. The indictment includes lazy reporters who didn't see that to the public, bribery to try to buy votes with tax dollars is regarded as even worse than bribery with stockholders money. The more sophisticated Tea Partiers get it, while the naive and narrowly-focused lamestream urban media has to be hit over the head with public unhappiness before they grasp such matters.
#6 Posted by Mark Richard, CJR on Sat 17 Apr 2010 at 03:33 PM
JG confirms a nasty stereotype. People on the Left say they resent being called 'unpatriotic', then routinely trash the fellow-citizens who do most of the working, living and dying in this country. They remind me of the German officer in 'Casablanca' who says of the Bogart character, 'He struck me as just another bumbling American', to which the Claude Rains character responds, 'I was with them when they bumbled into Berlin in 1918'.
I expect JG could be made to look like a 'moron' in debate with a sophisticated opponent of Obamacare, too. In fact, the Democratic Party has some constituencies which do not exactly express their support for Obamacare in wonky language. Then people such as JG defend their 'authenticity'. The Bourbons probably referred to the French masses outside the gates as 'morons', too, back in the day - not all 'evolved' and 'intelligent' like the self-admiring snivelers within.
Liberals sure must be insecure people. They constantly harp on how superior are their intellects, instead of actually refuting tough questions.
#7 Posted by Mark Richard, CJR on Sun 18 Apr 2010 at 08:21 AM
Ben sold us out and we will remember.
Hope obongo goes with him.
#8 Posted by Backdoor ben., CJR on Sun 18 Apr 2010 at 07:57 PM
I hope the people who decry Federal spending will refuse to cash their Social Security checks & immediately withdraw from Medicaid.
Funny how the folks who complain about "bribery" never mention the K-Street Project & the metastatic Federal corruption during the Bush years. Then again these folks get their views injected into them via Fox-News.
Yes, Virginia, these folks ARE morons.
#9 Posted by hadassah weinreb, CJR on Wed 19 May 2010 at 08:52 AM