The differences, both in time horizon and in forcing respondents to pick a single priority, are pretty stark. And if you want to know what voters’ “biggest worry” (Klein’s words) or “most pressing issue” (Lowery’s) is—in the everyday sense of “what problem people want their elected representatives to spend their time fixing right now”—the Gallup poll really doesn’t undermine the earlier findings, that jobs and the economy are the priority, at all. (To be fair, Thompson preserves the language about “future well-being” in his post, though he doesn’t emphasize its potential significance.)
Poll data are grist for the link economy, easily available hard information ripe to be dissected, analyzed, shared, and explored. That’s all well and good. But, please, let’s see a little more time, and a little more attention, spent on what the latest numbers do—and don’t—mean.

Ezra has pew polls up that address how the public feels it should deal with public finances:
http://voices.washingtonpost.com/ezra-klein/2010/08/a_reasonable_conversation_were.html
High income or all Bush tax cuts should expire, 70% say.
Why?
http://voices.washingtonpost.com/ezra-klein/2010/07/research_desk_compares_who_get.html
Most people didn't get much from the Bush tax cuts except future tax increases and possible benefit cuts. These people need, the quiet 70%, need to be heard.
Let the tax cuts expire. Pay for jobs.
#1 Posted by Thimbles, CJR on Tue 3 Aug 2010 at 03:26 AM