The following is the second post in my Questions Reporters Should Ask series, which I kicked off three weeks ago with Eight Questions Reporters Should Ask Mike Huckabee. As I wrote earlier, my goal with this series is to highlight questions that, to my mind and to the best of my research, the press has not asked (or at least not asked often or insistently enough) of, in this case, the Democratic candidate Senator Barack Obama. I’ll be posing questions for other candidates going forward. Next up: Mitt Romney.
Questions for Barack Obama
1. In June 2006 you voted against the Kerry-Feingold amendment that would have set a deadline of July 2007 for the withdrawal of almost all U. S. forces from Iraq. But in January 2007, you supported a deadline, proposing to begin redeploying troops by May 1, 2007, with the goal of removing all combat brigades from Iraq by March 31, 2008. Why did you change your mind about the desirability of setting a deadline for withdrawal?
2. At October’s Democratic debate in Philadelphia, you said: “We are committed to Iran not having nuclear weapons,” and that “there may come a point where [diplomatic] measures have been exhausted and Iran is on the verge of obtaining a nuclear weapon, where we have to consider other options.” Is preventive war with Iran one of those options?
3. You have said: “We must lead by marshalling a global effort to stop the spread of the world’s most dangerous weapons.” Toward that end, would you support a nuclear test ban treaty, and if so, how would you win a two-thirds vote of the Senate for it?
4. Many experts have taken issue with your health insurance proposal because it includes a requirement
of coverage—a “mandate”—for children and not adults. Proponents of a mandate for all argue that universal coverage cannot be attained without it. You have called a health insurance mandate an attempt to “force” people to buy insurance. Are you opposed to all government attempts to force people to do things they’d rather not do—for example, pay taxes? If not, why draw the line at a health insurance mandate?
5. On a related topic, you have said that medical costs must come down, and propose to bring them down by reducing paperwork and increasing competition among insurance and drug companies. Do you really believe that such measures are sufficient to bring down medical costs?
6. You have said that you are a member of the “Joshua generation,” whose challenge is to complete the work of the “Moses generation,” specifically with respect to the rights of African-Americans. Why, then, do you criticize Hillary Clinton and others who, you say, have “been fighting some of the same fights since the ’60s?”
7. Republicans have lately taken drastic steps against what they say is a plague of voter fraud. Indiana now requires every would-be voter to present a government-issued photo ID before casting a ballot. If the Supreme Court upholds that requirement, other states may pass or strengthen similar laws. What is your view of the prevalence of such voter fraud, and what should be done about it?
8. Nearly five million Americans—some 2% of the American electorate—cannot vote today because of they have been convicted of felonies. In this regard the US is unusual among the world’s democracies, which think that the rights of citizenship should be restored once a felon has served his or her sentence. Do you agree that former felons should regain the right to vote?
[Thanks to Michael Meyer and Mark Crispin Miller for suggestions and research.
Note: The direct quotations cited above can be found here and here.]


When Barack Obama was interviewed by David Sirota in the Nation last year, he was asked to give an illustration of credible reform “within the system.” The example Obama selected was healthcare. Obama then immediately shifted the problem to unemployment, asking what would subsequently
happen to the millions of insurance company paper-pushers whose job it is to prevent easy access to health care (although not quite in those words) if single payer reforms were adopted.
Good thing Obama wasn’t in the Senate in 1902, when the Oldsmobile threatened the livelihood of buggy-whip makers everywhere or we’d still be shoveling manure off the street of Manhattan.
The purpose of medical care is not to employ workers, whether they are physicians or support staff or insurance subordinates, but to ease the suffering of individuals. Unfortunately, health care for all will be less profitable for the real beneficiaries of today's healthcare industry: insurers, PHARMA, and the American Hospital Association.
For all his lofty rhetoric, Obama just doesn't get it.
Posted by lin@healthplannavigator
on Wed 2 Jan 2008 at 07:42 PM
I think these questions are easy to answer, but question number 4 is based on a mistake. Obama has never said that he draws a line at mandates. He says that the initial health care reforms should not include a mandate; a mandate should only be considered after reforms are attempted. Obama has never ruled out a mandate.
Posted by JohnKWilson
on Thu 3 Jan 2008 at 12:16 PM
The GOP candidate gets eight loaded questions asking him to justify his personal religous views and to speak for God...
While the DEM candidate gets eight softball questions designed to give him the opportunity to distinguish himself from other Dems (and also of course, those Repulicans who are taking some unspecified "drastic steps" to cure what "they say" is a voter fraud problem)...
Yeah... This is fair "journalism"... In McLearyland, that is...
Posted by padikiller
on Fri 4 Jan 2008 at 12:03 PM
Aside from the powder puff questions, I would like to see a few others asked:
1.How often do you use the backyard lot that longtime friend Tony Rezko bough for you?
2.Do you have any regrets about your 2002 senatorial campaign manager, David Axelrod, waging a behind the scenes campaign of lawsuits and court orders to open the sealed divorce records of Blair Hull and Jack Ryan, which all parties involved objected to it?
3.And since we had the felon voting questions, what about gun ownership? Should a convicted felon be allowed to own a firearm after his prison term is up?
Posted by TDC
on Fri 4 Jan 2008 at 05:27 PM
And, with the benefit of six months having passed, I'd now add:
1. How long can you go on ignoring substantial progress in Iraq that is directly the result of U.S. intervention? And do you refuse to visit and see it for yourself?
2. If you were willing to wait until a complete firestorm broke out before resigning from your Chicago church, what does that say about the judgment and instincts you would bring to the pressure chamber known as the Oval Office? And how many more Wrights and Pflegers are lurking from your past associations with radicals?
Posted by Obama Iraq Watch
on Mon 2 Jun 2008 at 05:50 PM
I AM A DISWABLED FEMALE. I WORKED 32 YEARS IN SEWING FACTORIES UNTIL SURGERY LEFT ME UNABLE TO WORK. ALL THE TALK ABOUT REBATES FOR WORKING FAMILIES ARE GREAT BUT WHAT ABOUT US RETIRED POOR PEOPLE. ME AND MY HUSBAND ARE IN WHEEL CHAIRS, LIVE ON 1500 A MONTH AND STILL HAVE TO GO TO STORES DRS AND WORSHIP, PAY BILLS, TAXES, INSURANCE, ETC. WILL WE BE INCLUDED IN THE REBATE TYPE CHECK IF YOU ARE ELECTED. THE GAS AND GROCERY PRICES ARE KILLING US TOO.
Posted by SYLVIA SMITH on Sun 3 Aug 2008 at 08:36 AM
I'm asking: Since Muslims, Jews, and Christians ALL have historical claims to and holy sites in Jerusalem, could Jerusalem be designated an International Heritage Site? Thus making moot any one nation's/religion's exclusive claims?
Posted by Constance Bartusis on Mon 4 Aug 2008 at 01:32 PM
As an African American I want to know how it feels when people refer to you all the time as being an African American while ignoring your Mother's heritage? Does appearing darker then most mixed children give society the right to just disregard your Mother's contribution to who you are? I think it's wrong.
Posted by Joanne Saylor on Thu 21 Aug 2008 at 11:21 PM
Who dealt your cocaine? As a member of the bar, an officer of the court, a community leader, a citizen and a parent, what steps have you taken to make sure your cocaine dealer faces justice?
Posted by padikiller on Fri 22 Aug 2008 at 10:49 AM
Followup: When was the last time you used cocaine? If stress drove you to criminal drug use, what assurance can you give to the American people that you can tolerate the stress of the presidency?
Posted by padikiller on Fri 22 Aug 2008 at 10:56 AM
Would Obama support medical aid to a non viable U.S.soldier, since he refuses to support medical aid for a "non- viable" infant?
Posted by T Chaperone on Sun 24 Aug 2008 at 02:02 PM
WHAT VALUE DOES THE MINIMUM WAGE LAW DELIVER? NONE!
It is an empty promise. It is a tax!
It does not raise people out of poverty. It merely drives the people who earn more than the ‘MWL’ to demand more, thereby increasing the cost to the employer many times over the cost of the lowest paid workers. The employer then raises the prices on the goods and services he offers. The end result is inflation. You do remember the 20% annual inflation when Jimmy Carter was president, don't you? For every action, there is a reaction!
The working poor are still poor (even if they have a job), only at a much higher cost. Another (and the most important) victim in this plot is the young person seeking his/her first job. Generally, those jobs no longer exist for these young people when they need it the most. The school system(s) all across the country are failing their students by not preparing them for life after school. Yet, the teachers demand ever-higher wages.
That first part-time, after school job, gave each youngster a way of making some money and learning about the world outside the home. It was an education that allowed him/her to relate to the outside world. The ‘MWL’ has made it too expensive to give that first job to every young person.
You hear Obama railing about jobs going overseas and how he will put a stop to it. He does not tell you that the ‘minimum wage law’ has raised the cost of all labor. And the ever increasing cost of labor in the U.S. gives rise to sending jobs to low labor cost countries. You have call centers for banks & ATT operating in India and the Phillipines where the labor costs are lower and there is an English speaking population.
The term: Latch-key kids (from the 50s) came out of the fact that mothers (both married and unmarried) are compelled to be in the workforce. That is a term to describe the children who come home to an empty house. They are then left to their own devices as to how to use their time. Without supervision, what do you expect those children to do? The idle young person spends much more of their time watching television. Mostly they are watching violent TV shows or, mindless situation comedies or cartoons (which are very violent).
That is the outcome of the ‘MWL’. We have failed to serve the next generation since the early 1960s. The Baptist church has a teaching; ‘An idle mind is the devils workshop’! The Catholics offered; ‘Idle hands, idle mind’! Another offers; ‘A busy child, is a happy child’! Every religion has similar teachings. It grew out of the time before urbanization when the church had greater influence in the lives of people. TV has usurped that influence. The ‘MWL’ has placed a larger burden on the family making it necessary for both parents to be in the workforce earning the money necessary to meet their needs.
Crime by youngsters is a result of the idle, unsupervised time they experience. I don’t think the costs are justified by the end result. The working poor are still the working poor, only at a higher cost. The ‘MWL’ earner may get a little more money, but his cost of living has gone up even higher.
Government has responded to the ever-growing demand for higher wages by raising taxes. That demand for higher wages is driven by the ‘MWL’. As people see, yet another increase for the lowest paid among us, they demand higher wages for themselves. The same goes for the academic institutions as they raise their tuition fees. Have you notice the spiral here getting out of control?
Compare the cost of goods and services in 1960 (when the ‘MWL’ was $1 ph) to what similar items cost today. A new Corvette was about $2500, a psychiatrist charged about $50 per hour, etc….. The cost of a traffic citation has risen to rather high levels. Compare that to the wages paid to law enforcement. A number of states are releasing inmates because of the escalating cost of operating the prisons. The wage demands of every group drives the health care cost and almost all price increases. To see a movie in 1960 cost about a buck, today it much closer to ten dollars or more.
Inflation: Too many dollars (an increase in the money supply) chasing too few goods. An increase in cost without a corresponding increase in value.
You raise the cost of labor and factories will close. The factory owners will then setup a factory in a low cost labor country and resume production. For the same reason, businesses setup call centers in India or the Philippines, all in an effort to trim costs. Then we complain that China is eating our lunch! We have outlawed the manufacture of low cost products in the US So much so, that our balance of trade is distorted.
I am sure you have heard the expression, ‘I wish I could get the government off my back’! What I find interesting is that the more we demand from government, the more government intrudes into our lives. As with the law of ‘unintended consequences’, the government intrudes where it is invited. The workings of government should be the concern of every individual, but often we let others worry about those things. We don't even vote with much regularity. Mostly, you get the government you deserve. The politians use your money to buy votes. It becomes a tax on the economy of the country.
The most logical course of action is to abolish the ‘MWL’ and return to the marketplace as the best arbiter of wages.
R.H.Smith
P.O.Box 7010
Van Nuys, CA 91409-7010
818/980-4786
RHSMITH001@YAHOO.COM
Posted by R.H.SMITH on Tue 9 Sep 2008 at 08:01 AM
Having never served in the US Military, what makes you think you are qualified to lead the entire US Military? What gives you the right to lead our military?
Posted by Stephanie on Thu 11 Sep 2008 at 09:31 PM
Mr. Obama has worked in this arena yet no one wants to go to the issues that effect this Country's Economy. I would like to know why no candidate ever addresses Welfare and US Citizens benefits versus Non US Citizen benefits. Citizens and legal Immigrants of the United States are adding to the welfare bank through their tax dollars with every paycheck to help our fellow countrymen and women in need, yet most of those benefits are not going to other US Citizens that pd into the same bank when they were employed and are now in need of help. Cash and Medicaid benefits are available from the US taxpayers for every child of an illegal from birth to the age of 18 if requested and meet criteria (like not knowing who or where the absent parent may be) BUT if you are a US Citizen those benefits are limited to 5 years. If this Government wants to save some money (millions at the least) for the individual States and Federal Government as well, all they have to do is make these benefits EQUAL to all. Everyone wants Equal treatment. Limit everyone or no one, do not discrminate. Lets also get some kind of criteria too. If you are the mother and don't know who the absent father is and you had concensual sex then too bad, maybe you should have pd a little more attention. These cases have to comply with their County Child Support services offices because Welfare is not free. Your neighbor who worked for years in the building industry, pd into the system with every paycheck he got and is now laid off and cannot get the same help that Illegal immigrants get because his or her unemployment is too high or because their time limit is up? Where is the Equality in treatment for the Citizens of this Great Country. Limit everyone or no one but do not penalize someone for being a US Citizen and being a taxpayer. I am well aware that there are more specifics to this matter involved and a can of worms is being opened but ignoring this issue is costing the taxpayers in this country millions and the taxpayers deserve and should demand more accountability of their tax dollars. The same Country that legal Citizen children that turn 18 are mandated to register with selective service and monitored if they don't yet how is there monitoring of those that are not legal and not registered. US Citizens have fought and died for the Equal and fair treatment of Legal and Illegal Citizens, give them equal and fair treatment as well.
Posted by Bobbie on Sun 14 Sep 2008 at 02:10 PM
Several of us who are Obama supporters
need to know what Senator Obama is going to do about the high gas prices when he becomes our President. Today (Oct.1) we heard how much the auto industry has lost in sales in the last month. While this is primarily due to the economy, it is also due to the high gas prices. And how about the people who work earning a low wage. How can they afford to pay for gas to get to work as well as putting food on the table.
Considering the outrageous profits the oil companies are enjoying, it would seem to us they should also be a part of the "bail out" dilemma haunting us today.
Please respond
G Bruguier
Posted by george bruguier on Wed 1 Oct 2008 at 08:14 PM
Why do we not get oil from Iraq in exchange for our war investment?
Posted by Art Bailey on Thu 9 Oct 2008 at 09:47 PM
I am a second year PhD student in economics in a top ten school. DOn ‘ t you think that your campaign has become too socialist with the welfare programs, and foreign aid to the point that we are forgetting us the people that have worked extremelly hard to get an education, and to make this country great? What wll happen to me when I finish my PhD in 2 years andI make a great salary but I have to pay back my loans? How will I ever finish paying back my loans if you will tax me so harshly? Pleaase think of the people who make this country grow
Posted by melissa on Fri 17 Oct 2008 at 10:28 PM
There is a threshold in Senator Obama's tax plan of $250,000. Is that gross income or taxable income?
Posted by Steve on Sun 19 Oct 2008 at 06:45 PM
omment by Tony Venuti,
October 10th, 2008 at 2:08 am
This 50 year strategy of social engineering by MediaOcracy, ( see http://www.beyondpuke.com ) has blind sided itself from typically clearer thinking heads, perhaps buried in the sand for all too long…No surprise.
Guilt by association proclaimed invalid by the Obamination train, but theDRAINstream, GILDED media can PROCLAIM guilt by ASSOCIATION to Bush and McCain and they DO… as if connected at the hip, one no difference to the other. This fed to us as if stuffed down our throats/ears.24/7 NOTNEWS news media….
The contemptuous, DraiNstream media, now MAKE the News, promote their agenda of all knowing all seeing….
Nostradamous err NEWStradamouse are the new(s) prophets of the times. Just ask them…the truth…AS THEY engineer it.
"No-News is Good-news News Hours"
(for those with fine hearing only)
This from Inpolitically correct, and Beyond Puke. http://www.beyhondpuke.com
Tony Venuti, Publisher of Az Tourist News
As a felon I can’t vote legally. As a felon my assoications and actions from 30 years ago STILL prevent me from even being a REAL ESTATE AGENT today. …never mind President…. AND when securing only a Secret clearance for duty in the military early in my life rejected me simply because of an association….from years past…but we are to NOT question Obama…
I don’t get this folks.
Ex-Con, Newspaper Publisher, and Master Salesman….I know the Media’s darkside….I know the con projected to our civilization via promotions of MediaCrats, the techniques they use are SALES…Fear, Greed, and Need…stuffed down your throat repetively-24/7, and as Publisher I know the Darkside…
Read much more at beyondpuke.com
Posted by beyondpuke on Sun 19 Oct 2008 at 10:51 PM
Is it true that you had an affair with a campaign staffer named Vera Baker, and that once your wife discovered the affair, you shipped Ms. Baker off to Martinique, just as John Edwards and Bill Clinton shipped their mistresses away to keep them out of sight?
Posted by padikiller on Tue 28 Oct 2008 at 08:55 AM
What happens to the executive order 13423 when we get a new president???
Posted by Koty on Tue 18 Nov 2008 at 02:27 PM
Who paid for your education and travel expenses at Occidental, Columbia and Harvard? Did you have any part-time or after school jobs? Who paid for your pot, booze and a little bit of "blow" when you were at the prestigious private high school in Hawaii. Do you have any regrets about using your mother or grand-mothers money to buy cocaine?
Posted by Jug on Wed 10 Dec 2008 at 11:14 AM
does president obama have a son and was he married before michelle?
Posted by vicki stone on Fri 23 Jan 2009 at 08:45 AM
Who cares and what does it matter ?
Posted by Anita Slavicek on Fri 23 Jan 2009 at 01:17 PM
im lisbeth and im 15 year old ii like t0o tell mr.obama the president of the united state to do something about the economy causee parent dont even have that much moneyy and nowww i cant go shopping everyweek and they said that with obama everything was goin to beee easyyy!!!
buttt the thing is that people doesnt see the different!!!!!!
Posted by lisbeth on Wed 20 May 2009 at 01:31 PM