So we have a situation with competing studies that offer different conclusions. What’s a reporter to do? Read them all, I say, and weigh the quality of the evidence, credibility of the sponsors, and exactly what questions were asked. And beware of presenting false equivalence. On this one, though, even some he-said/she-said dueling conclusions, are better than what ONNtv did—letting a candidate’s rhetoric stand on its own.
06:50 AM - June 25, 2012
Romney’s ‘job killer’ narrative: time for an X-ray
Some reporters are asking: Does Obamacare really destroy jobs?
Reporters fail to capture implications of pension provision - A ‘big shift’ tucked into the spending bill goes under-examined
The New Republic: A public trust or a business? - How Chris Hughes turned a 100-year-old publication into a “product”
Serial creators don’t know what will happen to Adnan Syed - New developments in his legal case suggest that the outcome is wide open
FOIA reform dies while the press looked the other way - RIP Improvement Act of 2014
The problem with sharing uncredited photos - “Just because you put something on the internet does not give people the right to steal it”
Email blasts from CJR writers and editors
“I didn’t become a journalist to peddle indignation on Facebook. But it sells—the page views don’t lie.”
“I remained silent and didn’t know what to say — I know how such attacks on schools usually end”
“This was not planned. She called in on the normal line.”
“People deserve to know that the American government (proudly!) did things that in any other context are called torture”
Greg Marx discusses democracy and news with Tom Rosenstiel of the American Press Institute
Who Owns What
A report from the Columbia University Graduate School of Journalism
Questions and exercises for journalism students.
Hey millionaire tech bros: Have patience with the editorial process – Chris Hughes probably wanted to enable great journalism at first. Then the dust settled and before you know it, he’s shaking everything up again