
Among highly paid primetime cable hosts who commute weekly by private jet between rural Minnesota and Manhattan, Ed Schultz is as close to a perennial underdog as you could find. Schultz, the star of The Ed Show on MSNBC and one of the most popular liberal hosts in talk radio, has a talent for taking embattled positions that, after much sweating and shouting, become ideal vehicles for his carefully cultivated image as the one liberal loud and mean enough to stand up for the working man. He’s both revered and hated as the media’s most outspoken champion of the beaten-down labor movement. And he first came to national prominence in 2004, when he began what is now a nearly decade-long struggle to reverse the fortunes of progressive talk radio, where the most popular liberal hosts air on fewer than 100 affiliates, while Rush Limbaugh, the right’s top talker, is on 600.
One area where even Schultz can’t cast himself as underdog, for the moment at least, is ratings. After briefly moving from 6 p.m. to 10 p.m. in the primetime reshuffling that followed Keith Olbermann’s parting ways with MSNBC in 2011, The Ed Show finally settled in at 8 p.m., and went on to have an impressive year in 2012. The “fat, red-headed guy from Fargo,” as Schultz refers to himself, handily beat the more camera-friendly Anderson Cooper in that timeslot. And while it seems no one ever will top Fox’s Bill O’Reilly, Schultz earned MSNBC its best 8 p.m. ratings among the coveted 25-to-54 demographic since 2009.
But even as Schultz’s audience grows, he’s beginning to look out of place in an MSNBC lineup that is increasingly the domain of a wonky, erudite liberalism that is about as far from Schultz’s fired-up everyman persona as 30 Rock is from Fargo. MSNBC President Phil Griffin has been working to make the network’s brand more recognizable and coherent, and Brian Stelter, who covers the television industry for The New York Times, reported in November that anonymous sources within MSNBC had told him Schultz might be kicked out of primetime in favor of the wunderkind Ezra Klein. MSNBC denied it at the time, and when I recently suggested to Griffin that the MSNBC brand seemed to be moving away from Schultz, he disagreed: “I think we’re always tinkering and evolving the brand. But I think Ed fits in there. And I think it’s very important to have that voice talking about the issues the way Ed does.”
Most likely, the contrast Schultz provides will remain popular with management for exactly as long as it remains popular with viewers, but a look at the heart of MSNBC primetime reveals an undeniable trend: At 10 p.m. there is Lawrence O’Donnell, a Harvard grad and former chief of staff of the Senate Finance Committee; Rachel Maddow, a former Rhodes Scholar who writes books with words like “unmooring” in the subtitle, is at 9 p.m.; and leading off is Schultz, a former NCAA Division II passing champion and owner of Big Eddie’s North Country Lodge, which offers fishing vacation packages in northern Manitoba. MSNBC’s weekend lineup, which the network considers a farm team for primetime, includes the decidedly un-Schultzian Chris Hayes and Melissa Harris-Perry, a professor of political science at Tulane.
It’s enough to make you wonder how Schultz ended up here in the first place.
The grinder
There’s one powerful interest group responsible for ensuring that Schultz has a live mic pointed at his mouth for four hours every weekday, and its name is Ed Schultz. He had help along the way, of course, including from some powerful entities (MSNBC and the Democratic Party chief among them) that felt they had something to gain by harnessing themselves to his ambition. But there certainly were more likely candidates for the job.

Ed has a work ethic like no other.
#1 Posted by Kay, CJR on Fri 1 Mar 2013 at 01:37 AM
What a sick-making puff piece. How tough CJR is on 'underdogs' (i.e., losers in the ratings wars), if they have the correct politics. I looked, but did not see, any reference to the 'spambot' revelations about 'The Ed Show' that have been recently uncovered.
#2 Posted by Mark Richard, CJR on Tue 5 Mar 2013 at 12:58 PM
Mark,
Thanks for taking the time to "look" for a reference to something Newsbusters wrote about three days after this piece was published. If you "read" we might be able to have a productive discussion.
#3 Posted by Michael Meyer, CJR on Tue 5 Mar 2013 at 02:02 PM
No mention of Ed Schultz's first wife, Maureen Zimmerman? One can only speculate why.
Is it because Maureen Zimmerman filed numerous orders of protection against Ed Schultz?
I think we would all like to know if Ed Schultz is abusive to women.
#4 Posted by Dave, CJR on Tue 5 Mar 2013 at 04:45 PM
Michael Meyer, fair enough. But CJR has been known to publish 'updates' on existing stories when it suits the political mission, such as ion Mariah Blake's energetic efforts, as non-partisan-sounding as those in defense of John Edwards not too long ago in CJR, on behalf of Sen. Menendez. Also, the 'spambot' story did not originate with Newsbusters, but with Paul Bibeau, a liberal blogger, the day after your piece ran. Does this mean that Newsbusters is more up-to-date in its information-gathering than CJR?
#5 Posted by Mark Richard, CJR on Tue 5 Mar 2013 at 05:14 PM
I don't think Ed really expects people to believe the poison he is spewing on that show it is completly off the wall. He is a big part of the problem with politics especially feeding this "who wants ice cream" crowd of loafers in today's society
#6 Posted by mark, CJR on Tue 5 Mar 2013 at 08:50 PM
If Maddow and Hayes are considered the MSNBC stars, go figure.
TV has strong pulls toward safety and political cliche.
Maddow is certainly not the political progressive that Schultz is, and Hayes is basically right of center, nothing progressive about him.
MSNBC, that runs fairly good talk shows, needs someone like Ed Schultz to balance all the pabulum, and the arm waving, finger thrusting, rat a tat tat gatling gun style of almost unlistenable vocal delivery featured by Maddow and Hayes! Schultz compared to them is amodel of gestural decorum!
Since they got going with the arm waving, fist showing, finger thrusting, table thumping--now a lot of the other talkies on the channel are doing it too.
What a silly bunch of grandstanders Griffin thinks are his stars.
TV talk show media needs to keep an honest broker like Ed Schultz.
#7 Posted by Jo Kirk, CJR on Thu 7 Mar 2013 at 03:51 PM
Until I read this CJR piece all I knew was...Shultz is a perfect fit for MSNBC between Chris and Rachel. It is good teleision. All three tell the story that fuits the world and gives HOPE!
#8 Posted by Fred E Walker, CJR on Thu 7 Mar 2013 at 03:54 PM
Ed Shultz is my favorite and Lawrence O'D. 2nd. I don't like the giberish of Chris, Rachel or Ezra as hosts. They remind me of someone that has to talk fast so they can go to the bathroom.
Take Ed off and I'll go back to watching CBS evenings.
#9 Posted by Sandy McGrew, CJR on Thu 14 Mar 2013 at 04:29 PM
Chris & Hayes really are not as passionate as ed is! They both race thru the written dialog with not much heartfelt enthusiasm. Don't get me wrong they are smart & talented but not the fighting passionate caring ed. I ll wait for the Rachel show. when ed switches I will follow his weekend time.I most likely will skip msnbc at the 8:00 hour.
#10 Posted by sbeaubien, CJR on Thu 14 Mar 2013 at 10:33 PM
I am so glad to find others who feel that Ed Schultz is the perfect balance to the decidedly cerebral approach of the other shows. I am pretty cerebral myself, so it is a great joy and relief to hear from people who speak from the heart.... I am so sorry that Ed is gone from 8PM since I don't watch MSNBC as much as I used to.
On another note, I am still stunned by the venom that some people spew in the comment sections... much of it quite ideological. I guess when you have reached all the conclusions there are, you just need to "find" justification or just make it up.
#11 Posted by Charlotte , CJR on Sat 13 Apr 2013 at 03:54 AM
Msnbc keeps dumping their most effective hosts. I can't believe they let ed get away. What a dumb move. Next it will be lawrence o. And chris m.. some of us older people are not conservatives so don't cater to the younger so much. You have lost this Msnbc watcher. I still watch Karen and ed on weekends when I'm home and lawrence Lawrence's, but I use to have tv on that station all day.
#12 Posted by ali godwin, CJR on Sun 23 Jun 2013 at 11:37 PM