Time was, a war of words between a food writer and an organic-foods retailer would have attracted the interest of maybe seven people in your local food co-opa bit of chatter over the brown-rice bin and everyone would move on. Those of us in a Safeway with our Perdue roasters and our broccoli avec a hint of pesticide would not have known that an argument took place. But the recent exchanges between Michael Pollan, author of the 2006 bestseller The Omnivores Dilemma: A Natural History of Four Meals, and John Mackey, the CEO of Whole Foods, are, if not squarely in the mainstream, awfully close to it.
Thanks to his perch as The New York Times Magazines resident food sage, Pollan is a well-known champion of the ethical superiority of small, local organic farms, and of the superior taste of their products. Whole Foods, of course, is a bringer of organic food to grateful yuppies across the country. In The Omnivores Dilemma, Pollan describes Whole Foods as the embodiment of “Industrial Organic.” The companys appetite for product has driven some organic farmers to scale up and become very much like the farms they were supposed to replace: organic dairies now house thousands of cows who have never munched on a patch of grass, while Brobdignagian vegetable farms ship their produce across the country, undercutting small, local farmers. Whole Foods even sells “organic” TV dinners (Pollan says one he tried “looked and tasted very much like airline food”) and, during the North American winter, has asparagus shipped north from Argentina. This would be environmentally dubious on its face, Pollan suggests, given the fuel required to ship the vegetable. In any case, it “tasted like damp cardboard.”
Mackey immediately fired back. In an open letter on the Whole Foods Web site,...
Complete access to this article will soon be available for purchase. Subscribers will be able to access this article, and the rest of CJR’s magazine archive, for free. Select articles from the last 6 months will remain free for all visitors to CJR.org.




In his essay "New Grub Street," Christopher Shea writes: "With apologies to Silver, Americans are never going to subcontract decisions about what to put in their bodies, or their kids’ bodies, to experts in white coats." But in reality, that is exactly what we have done (though our experts are more likely to be clad in coveralls than lab jackets). And that is exactly why so many of us are so fearful of so much of our food: we have left the growing of it to someone else somewhere else using methods we are only vaguely familiar with. We seek reassurance in labels like "organic" and "sustainable" (usually only partially understood), and in the endless analysis that leads to debates about carbon footprints.
Posted by Russ Parsons
on Tue 22 May 2007 at 09:04 PM
I'm more concerned about the fear than the food. One food writer who shares my concern, Paul Hertneky, wrote this about the food-conscious in Adbusters: "These enthusiasts devour cultural output. They gorge on images and words, rapturous words, stern words, clever words, words in the mouths of stars, experts, chefs and doctors, words off the fingertips of those like me, who obsess about food, unleash our imaginations on food, craving and coveting it, loving it and fondling it, very much fearing it, and essentially having it replace sex in our middle age." http://adbusters.org/the_magazine/68/Comida_Gorging_on_Words.html
Posted by Suz
on Mon 28 May 2007 at 05:30 PM
hahaha good job!!!!!!!!!!
Posted by kelli on Thu 13 Nov 2008 at 10:31 AM
Dear Mr. Shea [and CJR]
Please let me say, from the view of a "new" / professional food writer and journalist;
Your piece - How did ethics become a staple of contemporary food writing? - may be the most well writen essay on the topic I have ever read.
Sincerely,
J. Hugh McEvoy
President / Founder
Chicago Research Chefs
www.researchchefs.us
Posted by "Chef" J. Hugh McEvoy CEC, CRC, Cd.R on Mon 29 Dec 2008 at 12:08 PM