Every significant magazine in the U.S. either has or is about to set up its own Web site, but according to Victor Navasky, chairman of the Columbia Journalism Review (CJR), “No one has come forward to survey existing practices, identify the conflicts and choices, and start a conversation about guidelines and best practices.”
Now, thanks to a $230,000 grant from the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, the Columbia Journalism Review will undertake the first-ever survey of the relationship between magazines and their Web sites. The goal of the survey: to help magazines find a way to the best online editorial and business practices.
“It’s like the Wild West out there. Each magazine is making it up as it goes along, and nobody knows what anybody else is doing,” points out Navasky, who is also the Delacorte Professor of Magazines at Columbia University’s Graduate School of Journalism and will serve as the principal investigator. “The advent of these online offsprings has given rise to a vast set of ethical issues, culture clashes, chaotic and inefficient business and legal practices, and perhaps even malpractices.”
As magazines cut their operational costs, the pressure for print magazines to increase online visibility—often with a smaller staff and increasingly tighter budgets—will most likely increase. So will the need, therefore, of a clearer understanding of the business and editorial practices of magazines and their Web sites. The CJR survey will shed light on the road blocks to and the opportunities for achieving the best editorial and business practices for magazines and their Web sites. Once the results are compiled and analyzed, they will be published in a special issue of CJR.
Among the issues the survey will cover: Who sets the editorial line of the Web site, the editor of the parent print magazine, or the editor of the Web site? How much material is given away for free, and how much is behind a paywall? Which magazines print only materials from the parent magazine and which add new materials, and what is the percentage of each? The survey will include many other questions related to the business model, advertising practices, and editorial standards and policies.
CJR will endeavor to survey a representative cross-section of consumer magazines’ Web sites, including, for example, those covering general news, general interest, opinion, literature, men’s interests, women’s interests, shelter, science, technology, international, news and policy, as well as magazines that focus on regional interests, business, sports, academic research and selected special interests.
To conduct the survey, CJR has retained the services of SRBI, a fully owned subsidiary of Abt Associates and a national public opinion and market research firm, which has conducted research for major media including the Associated Press, Time, and Fortune, as well as for universities including Columbia, Harvard, and the City University of New York.
About the Columbia Journalism Review
Columbia Journalism Review’s mission is to encourage and stimulate excellence in journalism in the service of a free society. It is both a watchdog and a friend of the press in all its forms, from newspapers to magazines to radio, television, and the Web. Founded in 1961 under the auspices of Columbia University’s Graduate School of Journalism, CJR examines day-to-day press performance as well as the forces that affect that performance. The magazine is published six times a year, and offers a deliberative mix of reporting, analysis, criticism, and commentary. CJR.org delivers real-time criticism and reporting, giving CJR a vital presence in the ongoing conversation about the media.
About the MacArthur Foundation
The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation supports creative people and effective institutions committed to building a more just, verdant, and peaceful world. In addition to selecting the MacArthur Fellows, the Foundation works to defend human rights, advance global conservation and security, make cities better places, and understand how technology is affecting children and society. More information is available at www.macfound.org.
I think there are more common practices out there than this article makes it sound like. CJR may need to catch up with Wired.
#1 Posted by Wayne Steffen, CJR on Thu 26 Feb 2009 at 08:04 PM
There is one issue with regard to this article in a somewhat direct, yet in0direct way but nevertheless I thought that I would like to take the time to write a brief paragraph regarding digital print magazines versus the actual printed copy.
A perfect example occurred that warrants the fact that I would like to state that I just was involved in a class action suit against a computer company and my own computers are not functioning and I am borrowing a computer. I receive a PC magazine (print version) well at least I had in the past until one day I opened an email to find the print version is going to be digital. Explaining that I had really not much access to a computer the company merely stated that this is the way they are now getting the magazine out to subcribers.
I asked if exceptions are made for those that do not have computer access and a blatant "no" was the answer and I had 6 months of a yearly subscription left. I cannot sit up to read on-line anyway due to 16 abdominal surgeries and the inability to sit at a screen for that length of time and not receiving benefits as of yet, I cannot afffort to print it of I had a working machine. So, where does that leave those of us that want the magazine and know that the refunds for the time left will take 6-8 weeks and I do not want the refund. I want the content of the magazine!!!!!
What about advertising and are they complaining since we all know we block ads so it is not fair to the advertising that goes into these publications either....if there was a choice to receive the printed copy, then I could have some understanind but with this particular magazine, that option is not avilable so i have 6 months left of the magazine not being available to me and as I said, if I could get it, I couldn't sit that long and I can't afford to print it...
What are your thoughts?
I would like to see what others think.
Regards to all,
Debbie
#2 Posted by Debbie, CJR on Tue 7 Jul 2009 at 01:50 AM
This helpful research for print media and it really works.
Politics
#3 Posted by Politics, CJR on Thu 21 Jan 2010 at 07:34 AM
This survey is based on Journalism, i think it is useful to print media.
student aid
#4 Posted by student aid, CJR on Thu 21 Jan 2010 at 07:38 AM
"Who sets the editorial line of the Web site, the editor of the parent print magazine, or the editor of the Web site? How much material is given away for free, and how much is behind a paywall? Which magazines print only materials from the parent magazine and which add new materials, and what is the percentage of each? The survey will include many other questions related to the business model, advertising practices, and editorial standards and policies."
I liked this paragraph.
medical school
#5 Posted by nomi, CJR on Mon 25 Jan 2010 at 05:39 AM