Late into another sleepless Chicago night, I drag a blue-blooded widow and a balding curmudgeon under the covers with me, hoping they can help restore my faith. Mrs. Pynchon and Lou Grant are old friends of mine and I am happy to see them. But I make them whisper into my ear so we don’t disturb my wife. A few nights later, despite my best stealthy efforts, my wife catches us.
“What are you doing?” she asks.
“Mourning,” I say.
Since getting laid-off/axed/downsized/right-sized/fired last February from the Chicago Tribune, where I worked as a staff writer for eight years, I’ve downloaded and watched almost every episode of the first three seasons of the old Lou Grant television show on my iPod Touch. It helps me sleep. But the tiny iPod casts a big glow, so I pull the covers over my head like a little boy reading a comic book by flashlight way past his bedtime.
This thing with Lou, I assure my wife, is just a stage I’m going through. I’ll get over it. But right now I need a little help in getting past the anger, fear, and sense of loss that keep me up at night. It was watching Lou and the gang at the fictional Los Angeles Tribune that originally helped to convince me that a life in journalism was what I wanted—that it was fun and honorable and important. I’m surprised and happy after every episode at how good it feels to be back in a newsroom, even if it is only make-believe. Once I watched three episodes in a row before emerging from under the covers. There’s something comforting about the grouch’s gruff voice. But it is the premiere episode—September 20, 1977—that speaks to me the most these days.
*****
After ten years, Lou has just been laid-off/axed/ downsized/right-sized/fired from his TV news job in Minneapolis. He heads to L.A. to interview with his old newspaper buddy, Charlie Hume, the managing editor of the Tribune. Lou arrives a few minutes early and pokes his head into a newspaper newsroom for the first time in a long time. The room is filled with editors, reporters, photographers, and the kind of music that only an orchestra of typewriters can make. (Is there an app for that sound?)
As Lou looks around the room, a grin spreads across his face. He’s home. Lou sits down across from Charlie. “The old Call Bulletin we worked for doesn’t even exist anymore,” he says. “That kind of makes you feel a little strange.”
Charlie nods. He knows what Lou is talking about. But what are you going to do? Adapt or die, that’s what. Then Charlie asks Lou, “What makes you think you should have the job?”
Lou smiles. “That’s easy,” he says. “I’m fifty years old and I have $285 in the bank.”
*****
When I was growing up in Chicago there were four major dailies in town—the Chicago Tribune, The Chicago Daily News, the Chicago Sun-Times, and Chicago Today. There was also the Chicago Defender, the African-American newspaper that helped spark the Great Migration, bringing tens of thousands of fresh newspaper readers to the city. The Defender was published five days a week. By the time I graduated in 1980 with a master’s degree from the Medill School of Journalism at Northwestern University, only the Tribune, the Sun-Times, and The Defender were still standing of the major papers.
The Defender’s was my first newsroom. The managing editor was the blond grandniece of Clarence Darrow, the legendary Chicago lawyer. The city editor was a gay black man. Little did I know at the time how rare such racial and gender diversity was at the top of American journalism, or in its ranks for that matter. Newsroom diversity or lack thereof is a sore point for my friend Brenda Butler. A veteran editor with thirty years at the Chicago Tribune, Brenda was laid off, along with fifty-two colleagues, two months after a wave of twenty was washed out of the Tower with me.

Start that blog. I, for one, will read it.
#1 Posted by fazzaz, CJR on Wed 13 Jan 2010 at 09:44 AM
nice piece. for those who are interested, the first three seasons of Lou Grant are available for free online watching at Hulu.
#2 Posted by mwh, CJR on Wed 13 Jan 2010 at 10:01 AM
Put the reruns away and dust yourself off. A year is more than enough to mourn (sulk?) We all loved it and we all miss it. Deal already. You were lucky to get to the Tribune. In the weeds of smaller and esp. Gannett papers it was less fun but still good. You made more money and had no story quota. Lucky guy.
Dump the make-work one-year fellowship, and start your own news site. Just do it. Like, start today. Video classes are a time suck. Choose hyperlocal, or select a niche. They are both good. Get it going and the revenue might come. Read westseattleblog or medcitynews for good examples, and they are making money.
Just start. Today.
#3 Posted by a concerned friend, CJR on Wed 13 Jan 2010 at 10:28 AM
J-lab has a free portal 'newspaper in a box.' there are links to free legal help for these sites.
look forward not back. we get that you had it good.
now....next:
http://74.125.47.132/search?q=cache:eRWR2GG_XFwJ:www.j-learning.org/plan_it/category/Newspaper%2520in%2520a%2520Box/+newspaper+in+a+box&cd=4&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us&client=safari
#4 Posted by a concerned friend, CJR on Wed 13 Jan 2010 at 10:31 AM
Begin at the beginning. Watch Bogart in "Deadline USA," which served as partial inspiration for Lou.
Love 'em both.
#5 Posted by Dan Gainor, CJR on Wed 13 Jan 2010 at 10:33 AM
The Trib used to have wonderful writers like Terry and Solomon, and still has a few -- like Steve Johnson -- but too many stories are nonlocal, generic reports by staffers at Trib-owned papers elsewhere. Huge photos can't disguise the thinness of the content. Writing, however, is something else, not tied to a broadsheet or other specific form. It seems we as a society and an economy ought to have outlets for these gifted communicators who help us make sense of our world.
#6 Posted by Elizabeth, CJR on Wed 13 Jan 2010 at 10:59 AM
After a year, you've got to move on...you're wasting your time living in the past...you're obviously a smart guy. I'm sure this Lou Grant thing isn't helping your marriage any either...Forget the blog, forget journalism...It's over,Johnny...figure out where the jobs are, leverage your skills and interests..full speed ahead..no looking back-I wish you all the Best.
#7 Posted by Animal, CJR on Wed 13 Jan 2010 at 11:06 AM
Jeez, Don, I don't know whether to smile or open a vein. Nice piece, and good luck to you.
#8 Posted by Richard Perez-Pena, CJR on Wed 13 Jan 2010 at 11:13 AM
For God's sake, please don't start a blog! If any idiot can do a blog, and most of them are, why would you want to also? Plus, it's a lot of work for nothing. Better to help a friend plant a garden, or help Habitat build a house, or do something whose result you can see. Best wishes. It ain't easy.
#9 Posted by Susan Ager, CJR on Wed 13 Jan 2010 at 11:29 AM
Don, thank goodness you wrote this essay -- how else would you get the unsolicited career advice I'm sure you've been dreaming of?
Folks, whether you like how he's spent the past year or not isn't the issue. This is a thoughtful piece of writing; bittersweet, creative, well-crafted. The sort of thing I wish I found in newspapers on a regular basis, but don't anymore. I'm glad Don found an outlet for such work elsewhere.
#10 Posted by Emily Achenbaum Harris, CJR on Wed 13 Jan 2010 at 12:37 PM
Where the hell is the copy desk? The hed should be "Lou and I."
#11 Posted by old gray prof, CJR on Wed 13 Jan 2010 at 12:37 PM
Some years back, Denver's KWGN-TV was showing the "Lou Grant" episode in which contract negotiations with the printers and pressmen break down, expands to the editorial staff and it looks as if the paper isn't going to be published.
At the same time, in real life, the Chicago Tribune was experiencing similar issues with its unions and, if I recall correctly, the pressmen were ready to strike.
I've always wondered whether someone at KWGN freaked out that life was imitating art, because they pulled the plug on that episode at the 30-minute point. They broke for a commercial and never came back to show!
This can't compare, of course, with the time KWGN sought to sell more commercials into its airing of "Citizen Kane" and in butchering the movie deleted the final Rosebud scene.
#12 Posted by Leigh Hanlon, CJR on Wed 13 Jan 2010 at 12:53 PM
Buck up. Quit moping, re-invent yourself and move on. Don't make the same mistake our benighted industry has made by wallowing in self pity and waiting for a bailout.
#13 Posted by rivlax, CJR on Wed 13 Jan 2010 at 01:00 PM
This is so dear. Good luck to you.
#14 Posted by Bobbi, CJR on Wed 13 Jan 2010 at 01:04 PM
actually, the internet is only 'killing' american newspapers, and only certain ones of those: not very small; local dailies which have content that is not online.
newspapers elsewhere in the world are still thriving, ie japan, india, china, england, germany etc etc. the biggest japanese newspaper sells 14m copies a day, and japan is more internet savvy than the us. the biggest sunday paper in britain sells 3.4m copies.
get out of the us and look around.
#15 Posted by dreaming, CJR on Wed 13 Jan 2010 at 01:34 PM
Looks like he's doing OK with the New York Times: http://www.chicagonewscoop.org/staff/don-terry/
#16 Posted by Dave, CJR on Wed 13 Jan 2010 at 02:08 PM
I, too, was a Lou Grant fan and I, too, got the ax. But I did start a blog, which is my therapy as I work through what is happening in the industry and to me and my family personally. It's how I'm wired: find a topic, research it, write it. As a blogger, I may be among the Great Unread, but I still find it empowering to hit the "publish" button. Good luck.
#17 Posted by Right on!, CJR on Wed 13 Jan 2010 at 02:13 PM
Twenty years ago you wrote about me and my newspaper, The Riverdale Press, and when the story came out I felt honored that The Times had assigned a fine and caring writer to the story. Journalism needs you. Find a way to return.
#18 Posted by Bernard L. Stein, CJR on Wed 13 Jan 2010 at 02:15 PM
Emily, You're an enabler and living in the past as well.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Don, thank goodness you wrote this essay -- how else would you get the unsolicited career advice I'm sure you've been dreaming of?
Folks, whether you like how he's spent the past year or not isn't the issue. This is a thoughtful piece of writing; bittersweet, creative, well-crafted. The sort of thing I wish I found in newspapers on a regular basis, but don't anymore. I'm glad Don found an outlet for such work elsewhere.
Posted by Emily Achenbaum Harris on Wed 13 Jan 2010 at 12:37 PM
#19 Posted by Animal, CJR on Wed 13 Jan 2010 at 02:17 PM
"We lose ourselves when we compromise the very ideals that we fought to defend."
#20 Posted by twocent, CJR on Wed 13 Jan 2010 at 02:42 PM
Don, sorry to see that you have joined the club. I regret to say that I do not believe you will be the last. I left journalism in 2005, as you may well know. I worked a short time for a politician, then sought journalism related employment for more than a year, finally adjuncting at two colleges in early 2007. It wasn't until 18 months after leaving journalism that I found my calling. Now, I teach adult basic education, helping welfare-to-work clients get their GEDs so they can obtain jobs, get off welfare and support their families. The new job doesn't pay well, but I now feel as I did when I first entered journalism in 1980 -- I am doing something important, something that makes a difference in people's lives. I only ocasionally miss journalism, and that happens when certain major issues or stories come along. (I'm not talking about who Tiger Woods slept with.) Do the same, "My brother!" Find your new calling.
#21 Posted by Reginald Thomas, CJR on Wed 13 Jan 2010 at 03:27 PM
Really fine piece, Don. I feel affinity. I was deputy managing editor at the Baltimore Sun (another newspaper owned by Tribune Co.) when I was laid off in May. Luckily and gratefully, I found one of the few (maybe the only) job in newspapers at the time at the Philadelphia Inquirer and was able to continue my life in newspapers. (Full disclosure: I worked at the Inquirer from 1982-1996). My newspaper career may not last that much longer, but more than ever I appreciate what it means to work at a real newspaper. I wish you nothing but the best in your future endeavors. Paul Moore
#22 Posted by Paul Moore, CJR on Wed 13 Jan 2010 at 05:12 PM
I'm with Emily -- really lovely piece of writing. "Wallow" as long as you want, watch Lou as long as he offers you comfort. Whatever else you do, I'm sure you'll find places to write here and there -- just as you did with this.
Now excuse me, while I go download some of those shows ...
#23 Posted by Karen in Cleveland, CJR on Wed 13 Jan 2010 at 07:08 PM
I was among the 53 last laid off at the Tribune and among the handful of minorities, particularly on the editing and design desk. Even amid "diversity," the struggle to be seen as part of the team with what you know, how you know it and how you apply what you know is too much of a struggle for me to return to journalism. That is just as disheartening as the race for what boosts the bottom line. I actually wanted to help change the world and thought I could, even at what I thought were the highest levels of journalism. That wasn't for me to do, according to the trigger pullers of the tower. I wish I could say I learned this in 30 years; I had the unfortunate experience of learning it in 10. Instead of starting to pick up a stride in my career or starting to branch out in editing and design or even starting a family, here I am in my 30s, starting over. I'm glad I'm not alone in my feelings. Thanks, Don. I wish I could've known you.
#24 Posted by DeVona, CJR on Wed 13 Jan 2010 at 07:31 PM
don: i took a buyout, so i jumped and didn't get pushed. i did a blog and it didn't feel like either reporting or writing. mostly i hated it. i'm writing a book and the loneliness is beyond description. much to be grateful for, yes. but, the snart also tell me this grief thing takes two years. if that's true i have 4 months left. oy. the one mantra that works, for me, is that what i miss, every day, no longer exists. with the new york times, that's a physical as well as a "spiritual'' fact. i miss 43rd street. i wish i'd thought of watching "lou grant'' under the covers. a reminder that we had "it,'' however you define "it'' at the best and brightest time. allbest, jane
#25 Posted by jane gross, CJR on Wed 13 Jan 2010 at 08:47 PM
Don,
Thank you for your honest and insightful writing. I left the profession two years ago after two decades as a photographer. I miss it like hell and have never been sorry I left. (I believe that makes me conflicted.)
Best of luck to you and others working to find their place along with their passion.
Damn we were lucky!
#26 Posted by Steve L, CJR on Wed 13 Jan 2010 at 09:12 PM
don,
what an excellent essay. as a young print reporter, it's disappointing to see newsrooms lose people like you. it makes me worry about the future. thanks for reminding me about 'lou grant.' i only have one minor correction ... lou only had
$280. thanks to hulu i will revisit the first few seasons of the show.
take care.
paul sloth
racine, wis.
#27 Posted by paul sloth, CJR on Wed 13 Jan 2010 at 10:48 PM
At a similar career juncture about four years ago, feeling like I was a Civil War general who kept having horses shot out from under him, I went to the Museum of TV and Radio in New York and watched five Lou Grant episodes in a single afternoon. It was amazingly therapeutic. I too still treasure Lou's line in the opening episode about being 50 years old and having $280 to his name. And most important, I loved your essay and would eagerly read your blog.
#28 Posted by Walter Shapiro, CJR on Thu 14 Jan 2010 at 01:35 AM
It's nice to see my feelings in print, attributed to someone else. It belies the silent accusations that bitterness spurs my criticisms of the newspaper that laid me off 10 months ago. I was in the second wave, which got 15 people, only three of whom were under 50. The managing editor, who made the picks, prefers younger people for more than the obvious reasons. Since I was downsized/right-sized/laid off/axed/fired/booted, he has hired two new college grads and four interns. I can't help but see my newspaper in one description - "dumb in the content they put in the paper, dumb in trying to appeal to the wrong audience, dumb in the way they market themselves."
I'm sad for the demise of what was a good, solid paper, and also sad for myself, that someone could take my career, my passion away from me just because he liked younger, more impressionable people. I try to read the paper but too often there's too little in it. Now that I no longer work there, people feel free to tell how irrelevant they find it to their lives.
that's how it goes, I guess. /But it's not bad to be lumped in with Lou Grant et al.
#29 Posted by beverly a, CJR on Thu 14 Jan 2010 at 08:40 AM
Nice piece, Don. But do yourself a favor and look in the background of the romanticized Trib's newsroom. You'll find Donovan - the careful, hesitant, corporate editor in his cardigan. He was inconequential in 1977. But once Lou and Charlie retired and Mrs. Pynchon died, they laid off Rossi and handed the reigns of American journalism to Donovan. He was ghostly then. Now he's us.
#30 Posted by newsboy, CJR on Thu 14 Jan 2010 at 10:28 AM
Jane Gross - you are writing a book? cool. tell us about it on a twitter feed. I have many women journos on my folo list - check it out. we would love to hear from you, miss your byline.
tweet, pls.
@jprofnan
#31 Posted by meessage to Jane Gross, CJR on Thu 14 Jan 2010 at 10:42 AM
Very nice piece, but very sad. The fact that a guy who can write a piece like this can find himself out of a job shows just how bad shape journalism is in.
#32 Posted by Chris Isidore, CJR on Thu 14 Jan 2010 at 12:48 PM
Don, this is like something out of The Onion. Come on, Lou Grant was a TV show. It's like a World War II vet taking solace in John Wayne movies. Lou's world never existed. It was made up, just the like the sad story you're now buying into about your career/life. It's all in your head. Forget Lou Grant, and create a new, positive story about your life. It will work. You'll feel better. I promise.
By the way, you're a really good writer.
#33 Posted by Dave, CJR on Thu 14 Jan 2010 at 01:04 PM
Don,
I'm not usually a blogger, but my sister sent me the link to your article, and I have to weigh in on the side of Dave (1/14/10) and "Concerned Friend" (1/13/10) and encourage you to stop with the self-pity and the romantic nostalgia for an entirely imaginary era of journalism (see Barbara Kingsolver's novel "Lacuna" if you are adverse to reading Trotsky's original quotes about the news media circa 1938-40). Unemployment is a crisis, but it can also be an opportunity.You are a very talented writer, so apply your skills to a progressive purpose for a change. You no longer have the excuse that "my editor won't let me do it." And here's a suggestion for the national story that's being ignored by the mainstream media - the systematic dismantling of public education under U.S. Sec. of Ed. Arne Duncan (from your home town) and the corollary jettisoning of the promise of Brown v. Board of Education - that separate can never be equal and that every student has the right to a decent education that can take them beyond the conditions of their birth. There is a tsunami of an attack against public education being carried out in the name of "reform" by both liberals and conservatives and the incipient movement to stop it could use your talent, skills and connections.
#34 Posted by Donna Stern, old friend and Nat'l Coord. of BAMN, CJR on Thu 14 Jan 2010 at 02:12 PM
I'm with Emily - great piece. Best wishes....
#35 Posted by Wendy Martin, CJR on Thu 14 Jan 2010 at 04:16 PM
Don: It always has been and always will be about making the old new. Good luck, my friend. Jim
#36 Posted by Jim Sterngold, CJR on Thu 14 Jan 2010 at 05:33 PM
To all Don Terry fans-- he's only kidding about what's going on under the covers. We all love Lou Grant, metaphor for how we perceive(d) ourselves.
Here's Don Terry's latest story, dateline today,
http://www.chicagonewscoop.org/blacks-try-to-retain-power-as-board-race-splits-community/
Here he is listed on staff at http://www.chicagonewscoop.org/staff/
And this is what Chicago News Coop is:
http://www.chicagonewscoop.org/about-us/
which says in part.
"The Chicago News Cooperative produces public-interest journalism focused on Chicago, its politics and policy, culture and the arts, and the diverse communities of the metropolitan area. We publish in The New York Times on Friday and Sunday, the first outside news organization to produce entire pages for the Times. We also work in partnership with WTTW Channel 11, Chicago’s public television station."
I like the NYT's new business plan, picking up the pieces.
#37 Posted by Bonnie Britt, CJR on Fri 15 Jan 2010 at 04:39 PM
Lou Grant, the last TV series I watched. Fortunate that I was off on Mondays then, eh? Off to Hulu.
Thanks for writing this, Don.
#38 Posted by Owen Youngman, CJR on Sat 16 Jan 2010 at 06:38 PM
If newspaper articles were like this piece, they wouldn't be going out of business. Superb! Bravo!
#39 Posted by vip malixi, CJR on Sun 17 Jan 2010 at 02:31 AM
Don, don't think a headline has hit home with me this hard in a loooong time. I enjoyed your column and can relate. I watched all 68 episodes available of Lou Grant on hulu.com when I was laid off from the newspaper business. I recently re-entered the newspaper world, but glad I got to spend some quality time with Lou during my extended vacation. The show went off the air when I was just a kid, so I didn't know much about it until discovering it on hulu.com. Great show and great column. Good luck.
#40 Posted by Scott Carter, CJR on Tue 19 Jan 2010 at 04:53 PM
Don: Many thanks for the good read!
#41 Posted by Karen Callaway, CJR on Thu 21 Jan 2010 at 07:42 AM
"afflict the comfortable" ?
Could this have anything to do with the Self Righteous Ideologue leading many such as myself to save that money formerly spent on a New York Times subscription?
As a former photojournalist and one who has been enchanted with the profession of journalism since a very young age, I ended my love affair with the NY Times when it became glaringly obvious there was no longer a place for journalistic ethics. The notion that the Haves need to be vilified in order to advance the Have Nots is wearing thin on the American people
#42 Posted by tracy, CJR on Thu 21 Jan 2010 at 09:38 AM
The best place for freelance projects is freelancing sites. Freelancing sites are the best option for part time home based business and freelance jobs. There are many types of work available at freelancing sites
www.onlineuniversalwork.com
#43 Posted by charlesbrooks, CJR on Tue 26 Jan 2010 at 01:40 AM
The best place for freelance projects is freelancing sites. Freelancing sites are the best option for part time home based business and freelance jobs. There are many types of work available at freelancing sites
www.onlineuniversalwork.com
#44 Posted by davidbaer, CJR on Wed 27 Jan 2010 at 11:12 PM
Affiliate Marketing On The Internet
Affiliate Marketing is a performance based sales technique used by companies to expand their reach into the internet at low costs. This commission based program zsuch as email distribution in exchange for payment of a small commission when a sale results.
www.onlineuniversalwork.com
#45 Posted by somaie, CJR on Sat 30 Jan 2010 at 01:47 AM
Wonderful piece Don. I'm commenting on, "Lou Grant was a TV show." Lou Grant was enhanced fiction but the details were right on. Ed Asner visited the Cincinnati Enquirer before the show began. Asner was a good reporter. For months we saw Enquirer anecdotes incorporated into the show. Do you remember the episode when it was hot in the newsroom and someone said, "We used to have windows in the newsroom but they walled them up for the air conditioning." The quote may be off but the concept is from the Enquirer.
#46 Posted by Tom, CJR on Sun 7 Feb 2010 at 11:49 PM
To old gray prof: don't berate the copy desk. The hed "Lou and Me" is not necessarily wrong. It isn't so much a "Lou and me got laid off" story as a "what became of Lou and me" story. Your change would make it " what became of I."
#47 Posted by old gray tv hack, CJR on Wed 17 Feb 2010 at 01:24 PM
Great piece, as good as I've read about the death of the printed page (much exaggerated, thankfully). Nice to see our old pal here in Belfast Tom Hundley get a shoutout. Look at all these comments; who would have thought there were still readers out there?
#48 Posted by Máirtín Ó Muilleoir, CJR on Tue 23 Feb 2010 at 04:27 PM
I'm reading this two and a half years after you've written it. After a decade I am going back to journalism. Why? Because I still believe that there are Lou Grants out there, who are not scared to make a difference and can motivate their editorial team to create an informed society. I am not from the USA, recession is hitting us hard and there are lay-offs in the newsroom, but this is a risk I must take. I hope that when I rejoin I will be able to say, that I work for a newspaper, a real newspaper.
#49 Posted by Lu, CJR on Sun 8 Jul 2012 at 11:38 AM