One of the most pernicious stereotypes about gay men is that any one of them might be a pedophile. As more Americans have gotten to know the gay community, this fear has started to subside. But it raised its ugly head this week in stories about a potential change in Boy Scout policy.
On Monday, the Boy Scouts of America released a statement saying they were considering ending the national ban on gay membership in the Scouts. The organization would leave it up to local councils and sponsoring groups as to whether troops would allow openly gay boys to be members and gay and lesbian adults to be troop leaders.
I wrote about this Boy Scout policy in October, back when a teen who had earned the rank of Eagle Scout was denied the honor because he had come out as gay. In that column, I wrote about how important it is to add context when covering stories that seemed to be retreading old ground.
None of the stories I read at the time mentioned pedophilia, because that story was about a gay child. But the latest Boy Scouts development is about the possibility of openly gay adults leading troops, so the specter of pedophilia appeared. (Openly gay adults have led troops in the past, but they have been dismissed when the national organization learned about them). And since it has appeared, it needs to be debunked.
Fox News twice linked gay men with pedophilia in stories on the Boy Scouts, as the progressive activist group Media Matters for America pointed out. In one, Fox reporter Doug McKelway said, “Others say, and I’m sure we’ll hear a lot of this in the coming days, a lot of people who don’t want their kids to go camping out deep in to the woods for days on end with guys who are avowed, open gays.”
In the second, he says the impending change for some “traditional values” families is “deeply disturbing” and later mentions that “following literally hundreds of incidents of predation by pedophiles, the Scouts adopted a policy whereby one-on-one contact between adults and scouts is prohibited.”
Nowhere does McKelway say that gay men are just as unlikely as straight men to be pedophiles, which is the case. In just one instance invalidating the link between gay men and pedophilia, Dr. Gregory Herek, a psychology professor who studies sexual orientation, prejudice, and science at University of California Davis, writes:
The mainstream view among researchers and professionals who work in the area of child sexual abuse is that homosexual and bisexual men do not pose any special threat to children. This well known lack of a linkage between homosexuality and child molestation accounts for why relatively little research has directly addressed the issue. Proving something we already know simply isn’t a priority.
Yet pedophilia keeps coming up. In a blog post in the online magazine Salon, Katie McDonough put up a video in which a spokesperson for the American Family Association describes his horror at learning of the Scout’s impending decision. The entirety of her accompanying text is this:
Bryan Fischer, director of Issues Analysis for the American Family Association and famous kidnapping enthusiast, warns that if the Boy Scouts of America lift their decades-long ban on gay membership, pedophiles will soon be “bunking down with your kid at jamboree.”
“This is just unbelievable to me. This is a suicide mission on the part of the Boy Scouts. They’re done. They’re toast. They’re history,” he said. Adding, “We know that homosexuals offend against children at roughly ten times the rate that heterosexuals offend against young children. There is a risk there — it’s just insanity that they are relaxing the standard.”
Because the tone is slightly snarky and it appears at the fairly liberal Salon, I suppose it’s implied that McDonough doesn’t agree with Fischer. But she doesn’t say so and instead lets a harmful factual inaccuracy — that gay men are 10 times more likely to molest children than straight men — stand without comment.

I don’t think it’s bad for reporters to bring up pedophilia when writing about gay men and the Boy Scouts if parents bring it up on their own as a worry. But it is important to recognize that being concerned about gay men leading children in the scouts because of prospective pedophilia is an unfounded fear. Instead of further scaring our readers, we should inform them — with facts.
Hmmm ... yes ... "facts".
If assessed according to conversion method 1 (see above), the ratio
of heterosexual vs. homosexual pedophiles in the present sample was
1.35:l. If assessed according to conversion method 2, this ratio was 1.44: 1. When considering the 7.6 factor of Abel et al., the two ratios
of heterosexual vs. homosexual pedophiles, according to methods 1
and 2 above, would increase to 10.26:1, and 10.94:l.
- Freund, K. and R. I. Watson, The Proportions of Heterosexual and Homosexual Pedophiles Among Sex Offenders Against Children: An Exploratory Study, Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy 18; 1992.
In other words its disproportional.
#1 Posted by Mike H, CJR on Fri 1 Feb 2013 at 04:15 PM
What also might help dispel this “myth” is if the gay community didn’t hold gay pederasts up on an alter and genuflect every time their names were mentioned: Harvey Milk, Allen Ginsberg, Harry Hay, Michel Foucault.
Perhaps it would have been better had Yale not named its initiative for Lesbian and Gay Studies after an outspoken pederast like Larry Kramer .. you know, to help dispel instead of wallow in these myths.
#2 Posted by Mike H, CJR on Fri 1 Feb 2013 at 04:34 PM
Taking into account Mike H's "logic," we should note that heterosexual men rape females (including teenager girls) at about, oh, a million times the rate that females rape males.
So extending Mike H's "logic" we should forbid any man from teaching college or high school, managing agencies or business units that employ women, serving as ministers in congregations that include women or girls, etc.
Sexual assault in all its horrifying forms continues to be major problem in our society. We'd have a better, safer, kinder society if we worked in good faith ways to combat the problem rather than using the issue as a club to justify prejudices against one group or another.
#3 Posted by whm, CJR on Sat 2 Feb 2013 at 02:26 PM
In the article about gay men being pedophiles, there's a lot of argument about just how much more likely it is for gay men to be pedophiles than straight men.
But all this is missing the point. Men are much more likely than women to be pedophiles - much more so than even the most disproportionate estimates of gay pedophiles. Going by that line of reasoning, all scout leaders should be women. Don't ban gays from boy scouts. Ban MEN from boy scouts.
Or, you know, just ban pedophiles.
#4 Posted by EricRead, CJR on Mon 4 Feb 2013 at 05:22 PM
Oh Mike, u failed to mention that in THAT VERY SAME BOOK you cited, Freund said the notion that gay men are more likely than straight men to be child molesters is simply not true - pg. 41
#5 Posted by a.mcewen, CJR on Mon 4 Feb 2013 at 06:35 PM
I don't believe gay men are more likely than straight men to be pedophiles, but there is an 'opportunity' factor in the mix, which is why men are not allowed to be Girl Scout masters.
Did Jennifer Vanasco or CJR raise this issue when the topic was Roman Catholic priests and pedaresty? Just asking the obviouis, but to be PC is to determinedly ignore the obvious.
#6 Posted by Mark Richard, CJR on Wed 6 Feb 2013 at 12:28 PM
What critics of the priest sex abuse scandal focused on was the cover up by the church hierarchy of large numbers of documented cases of molestation. No responsible critic said that "all priests molest" or that, well, "all priests should be banned from being priests " or "all priests should be banned from working with kids"(the parallel of "all gays should be banned from being scoutmasters"). They said "child molesters shouldn't be priests" (How PC of them!). And they said that evil flourishes when people in positions of power turn a blind eye to abuse, shuffle abusers into new positions where they have more opportunities to abuse, and generally engage in a top-down cover up.
#7 Posted by whm, CJR on Wed 13 Feb 2013 at 02:16 PM
Mike, I have to wonder if you actually read and understood the statistics behind the paper that you cite from 1992. The paper actually says that it estimated that there are about 10 heterosexual pediphiles to every homosexual pedophile. It then goes on to suggest that gay men may be slightly more likely to be pedophiles because it would expect the ratio to be 20:1. Presumably this is based on an esitmate that gay men account for 5% of the general population. The devil is in the math any inaccuracy in the estimated ratio or the percent of the population that is gay will potentially have a large impact on the interpretation of the results. The bottom line it that this early study is crude in its methodology and is based on a numerous unknowable asumptions. Later more rigorous work has demonstrated that there is no difference between gay and straight men when it comes to pedophilia.
#8 Posted by Phil , CJR on Fri 22 Feb 2013 at 04:14 PM