Last may, a CBS/New York Times poll found that 69 percent of Americans want to see the country’s illegal immigrants prosecuted and deported. But, the next month, NBC and The Wall Street Journal released a poll suggesting that, in their heart of hearts, 85 percent of Americans recognize that summarily removing 10 or 20 million people isn’t realistic.
Those two numbers provide a pretty good snapshot of the nation’s confused and confusing immigration debate, including its contradictions. Some folks talk tough about the rule of law, but worry about splitting families by the happenstance of citizenship. Some business owners depend on foreign workers; others are outraged that their competitors hire illegal immigrants without consequence.
These debates, and many others, will come up as Americans pick a president. John McCain made it out of his party’s primaries after being roughed up over his immigration plan, whose concepts most Americans supported. Democrats have so far parried the issue, but that probably won’t be the case in many congressional races and the general election.
Through it all, close looks will be necessary. Clint Hendler, a CJR assistant editor, spoke about the challenges and changes to the immigration beat with Dianne Solís of The Dallas Morning News. Previously, Solís worked for The Wall Street Journal, including a stint in the paper’s Mexico City bureau. In 2007, her reporting on immigration drew the attention of the National Association of Hispanic Journalists, which named her print journalist of the year.
What’s different now from the early part of the decade?
We haven’t seen a crackdown this severe since the 1950s. In the 1950s, the U.S. government had a deportation effort that was bluntly called Operation Wetback, and the estimates of how many people were deported or self-deported then is wild in...
Complete access to this article will soon be available for purchase. Subscribers will be able to access this article, and the rest of CJR’s magazine archive, for free. Select articles from the last 6 months will remain free for all visitors to CJR.org.





Media organizations need to clean up their own act in order to make their reporting more credible on illegal workers and their illegal employers. All employers can use the free federal online E-Verify program to verify the eligibility of persons to work in this country. 92,000 employers are using it already. It would be heartening to see that media organizations take a leadership role in the rule of law. Then they can editorialize to their hearts' content with clean hands.
Posted by Carl Olson
on Tue 25 Mar 2008 at 07:10 PM
I started to tune out when the article pretended that we've had and will have a debate about this issue. What's actually been happening is the MSM has printed literally tens of thousands of articles containing false, misleading, and/or incomplete statements and have tried to have as little of a debate as possible.
As for Solis, here she is back in 2006 spinning things the Mexican government's way: tinyurl.com/ysbkw3
Her she is, "forgetting" to list material affiliations: tinyurl.com/2fs6ok
And, here she is, not following the money: tinyurl.com/2fs6ok
And, here she is passing off claims as fact: tinyurl.com/ys65e9
Tired of her "reporting"? For quick examples of CNN's version of a "debate" about this issue, see these:
youtube.com/watch?v=nIbDAVQMKGM
youtube.com/watch?v=wm0uWz2BS9M
Posted by NoMoreBlatherDotCom
on Tue 25 Mar 2008 at 11:05 PM