We’ll have a long story on the Times-Picayune next week, but Publisher Ricky Mathews and Editor Jim Amoss released some numbers in the last few weeks in order to tout the success of their new business model, which among other things cut daily print distribution to three days a week.
But there’s less there than meets the eye.
Poynter reports this from a conference the two top NOLA Media Group executives attended this week:
Mathews said average daily circulation grew about 1 percent from the third quarter of 2012 (before the print change) to the fourth quarter in 2012 (after the change). Average Sunday circulation is flat. It’s not a huge growth, but Mathews said the paper’s circulation had been tracking down four percent to seven percent the past few years.
The problem is seasonality. Quarter-to-quarter numbers are less helpful than year-over-year ones because of seasonal variations in sales (think Christmas for retailers). That’s why the latter is standard practice among public companies, and why it’s something to flag when executives tout the former.
It’s particularly so in this case since newspaper circulation is usually lower in the summer than it is the rest of the year. The real question is what circulation did in the fourth quarter compared to the same quarter a year earlier.
It’s hard to know, at least from Poynter’s reporting, what the “tracking down four percent to seven percent” part means. If that number is Picayune’s’s annual circulation trends, then it’s a pretty egregious apples-to-oranges comparison. It’s only meaningful if it’s the sequential (third quarter to fourth quarter) trend going back several years.
The paper is owned by Advance Publications, which is closely held and, unlike public companies, is not required to release full financial statements. This is, by definition, selective disclosure, and it doesn’t tell us much.
But we can get a rough idea of this effect by looking at the securities filings of a public newspaper company like McClatchy. In the last three years, McClatchy’s paid daily circulation has risen an average 4.9 percent from the third quarter to the fourth quarter, while Sunday rose an average 2.9 percent. This while year-over-year circulation, what actually matters, was declining an average 6.1 percent daily and 2.8 percent on Sundays.
You can see that Sunday circulation is slightly less seasonal than daily circulation, which matches up with Mathews’ numbers. And you can see how misleading it is to use sequential numbers instead of year-over-year ones.
But even year-over-year numbers wouldn’t quite be an an apples-to-apples comparison for the Picayune because of the changes done to its publishing schedule and because of the damage unleashed by those changes and others made by Advance, which is what I write about in the next issue of CJR.
As I’ve written before, you’d expect to see a modest increase in circulation—all other things being equal—because seven days of newsstand sales are now compressed into three. Therefore daily circulation would be up as fewer edition are sold into a market that remains the same.
That might help explain (along with lower Sunday seasonality) why daily circulation is up 1 percent while Sunday circulation, which industry-wide has held up better than daily circulation across the country, is flat. There were six days of daily papers, which are now squeezed into two days. But there was only one Sunday paper before and one Sunday paper now.
More important is the change in the company’s circulation tactics. The Picayune, I’ve learned, is aggressively discounting subscriptions now, a self-defeating practice (since revenue losses from price cuts aren’t generally made up by circulation gains) meant to quasi-artificially bolster ad rates that the paper’s former publisher Ashton Phelps ended years ago. And it has continued throwing papers to the many subscribers who have canceled their subscriptions, according to many people I’ve spoken to down there. It’s worth noting that The Advocate, the Baton Rouge paper that launched a daily New Orleans edition when the Picayune went to a three-day schedule, told me last month that it has a daily circulation now of 23,500. It’s hard to imagine that hasn’t come at least in part at the expense of the Picayune.

I love getting a paper 7 days a week....used to subscribe to the times picayune when my husband was employed as a photographer. Now, I take the Advocate & Scott shoots part-time for them. Best of both worlds!
#1 Posted by Leslie threlkeld, CJR on Fri 22 Feb 2013 at 04:05 PM
Caution merited - you should verify the "throwing papers" statement, since there has been a community edition of the paper tossed for free on porches every Thursday.
#2 Posted by 504crank, CJR on Sat 23 Feb 2013 at 03:57 PM
http://www.syracusenewtimes.com/newyork/article-6446-post-mortem.html
Story on the Syracuse Post Standard, also advance.
This is a perfect "target" for a review. Columbia J school vs Newhouse PR school.
#3 Posted by bob, CJR on Sat 23 Feb 2013 at 04:21 PM
I cancelled my 20 year subscription after the last election when so many races were undecided for the T-P's Wednesday edition. It took 3 months before they stopped delivery and charging me. I complained to Visa and the money was returned. I am sure I was counted as a subscriber through the end of the year.
#4 Posted by John-Christopher Ward, CJR on Tue 26 Feb 2013 at 03:32 AM
They will spin all they have as to not be effected by the "noise" of the Advocates new 20k subscribers + must have made $ with all the cuts and sale of infrastructure.
We also canceled our close to 20 year subscription, and actively avoid all NOLA.scum online- then had to call repeatedly and demand they stop throwing that Dirty TP on our doorstep. I'm sure they will count the ones that landed...
Best from Freret,
Andy Brott
#5 Posted by Andy Brott, CJR on Wed 27 Feb 2013 at 10:13 AM