Not content with dominating the Times-Picayune’s front page on Thursday with a press release from its editor, the paper ran an awfully similar piece by the new publisher on page one Sunday headlined “The Times-Picayune and NOLA.com are here to stay.”
As if the Times-Pic needed to remind New Orleanians that its absentee owners have brought in an outsider to gut their hometown paper, Publisher Ricky Mathews leads with it. And where he directly addresses the protests over going to a three-newspaper-a-week schedule, he doesn’t bother to mention the much more serious complaints about the paper firing half its newsroom (with nebulous and not exactly confidence-inspiring promises to add about half of the headcount back, presumably with titles like “buzz reporter”) and trying to shift readers to a website that everybody thinks is awful.
Apparently nobody wanted to edit the publisher, who got 1,800 words when about 800 would have been plenty, and who writes stuff like this:
Online revenue at NOLA.com continues to grow as advertisers in growing numbers see the benefits of Louisiana’s No. 1 news and information web site.
Worse, Mathews doesn’t talk about any numbers (beyond Nola.com traffic but, notably, not Nola.com revenue), which makes his piece even less credible. You’ll just have to trust him that he and Advance know what they’re doing. It’s their business and that’s their right. But if they want to salvage what’s left of their connection to the community, which is the source of the asset’s value, they’d provide more numbers and less consultant-speak. “What this plan represents is an entrepreneurial investment in our future” doesn’t mean much of anything.
Advance Publications is privately held by the Newhouse family, which is why those numbers are harder to come by. But Poynter’s Rick Edmonds has tried to game out how much money Advance might save by cutting print to three days a week and slashing the paper’s newsroom. It’s a very, very rough estimate, based on assumptions that the paper’s revenue and cost mix is similar to the industry average, but it’s the best we’ve got. And it’s not pretty.
Edmonds estimates that the Times-Pic’s print reduction will actually lose the paper money, at least initially: slicing revenue by 22 percent and costs by just 17.5 percent.
So why are they doing it? Because gutting the news budget by an estimate half, would save up to 7.5 percent of overall costs, making the idea slightly profitable. And when I say “slightly” I’m talking about two or three million dollars a year, based on Edmonds’s fairly generous assumptions.
It is easy to see why Advance, so far, is nearly alone among news organizations in taking this plunge.
Again, the primary problem here is not the reduction in print, but the decimation of the Times-Picayune’s newsroom. In other words, disinvesting in journalism behind a digital smokescreen, as I wrote last week. Since Mathews wouldn’t mention the latter, we’ll turn to The Gambit, the New Orleans alt-weekly, for details on the layoffs:
Richard Thompson, a business writer, brought a bottle of Crown Royal to his meeting with his supervisor. He ended up splitting it with business editor Kim Quillen. Both were fired.
So was longtime religion reporter Bruce Nolan, who had confronted Amoss — with whom he had graduated from Jesuit High School more than 45 years ago — in a speech that was taped and leaked out of the newsroom after a contentious meeting with employees. So was St. Tammany bureau chief Ron Thibodeaux, a three-decade veteran who just the week before published a book, Hell Or High Water, which gave a Cajun perspective on Hurricanes Rita and Ike. So was St. Tammany reporter Christine Harvey.
So were education reporter Barri Bronston, reporters Katy Reckdahl and Paul Purpura, sportswriter Lori Lyons, editor Dennis Persica, Baton Rouge reporter Ed Anderson, columnist Sheila Stroup, horse racing writer Bob Fortus, political cartoonist Steve Kelley, photo editor Doug Parker and photographers John McCusker, Matthew Hinton, Scott Threlkeld, Ellis Lucia and Eliot Kamenitz — along with dozens of others.
- 1
- 2
Newhouse has sucked for a very long time.
Freedom of the Press is Not Free
http://blog.locustfork.net/2012/06/freedom-of-the-press-is-not-free-3/
#1 Posted by GW, CJR on Wed 20 Jun 2012 at 11:22 AM
OR: Making these changes, even if they're money-losers, is far more palatable to the company than potentially paying out millions in a class-action lawsuit over failing to adhere to its contract with workers (job security pledge). These changes create a new company that is completely severed of the old job security pledge, and by taking severance or accepting a position with the new company, employees are signing away their rights to sue. This is very important to Advance.
#2 Posted by Dave B., CJR on Wed 20 Jun 2012 at 01:14 PM
This is about controlling the level of information available to voters as well as sucking all value out of a business. Uninformed voters make poor decisions, as recent election results have demonstrated. Low information voters elect officials who do not enact legislation conducive to the financial health and growth of the working and middle class. The current state legislature will allow home-school children to be taught that evolution "has been disproved" and that humans and dinosaurs lived concurrently.!
#3 Posted by Anne, CJR on Wed 20 Jun 2012 at 02:58 PM
Anne is correct, and I wouldn't be at all surprised if Newhouse wasn't directly involved with ALEC and/or the Koch brothers. We have been noticing the gradual de-newsification of the T-P over the past several years, along with more bad editing and less literate writing (the quality of which had been a hallmark of the paper before the post-K firings began). Now they promise us "more emphasis on sports and entertainment" -- WHAT? Like the Mobile Press-Register? One is hard pressed to find one scrap of national or international news there, unless it reflects badly on the current president. What will really be hard to find will be the small notices of some new land grab or municipal decision that adversely affects our daily lives, ignorance of which will damn us to the corruption we have been endeavoring to root out since 2005.
#4 Posted by Cynthia Scott, CJR on Thu 21 Jun 2012 at 10:28 AM
"Worse, Mathews doesn’t talk about any numbers (beyond Nola.com traffic but, notably, not Nola.com revenue), which makes his piece even less credible."
Actually, this has been happening for a long time in newspapers. Every time one of them redesigns, a claim is made that the new version is more "easily navigated." Generally at some point someone claims, in print, that the change either has attracted or will attract more readers. No numbers are ever cited.
A check of circulation numbers would indicate these claims have been lies for quite a while. Yet they continue.
It'd be great if CJR would bother to look into this at some point.
#5 Posted by Robert Knilands, CJR on Thu 21 Jun 2012 at 02:29 PM
sports,enterainment,empty nutrition high calory food and drink ,science empty ,reason based on gulp and uncritically accepted premises leads to a nation of fat sheep ready to follower any so called leader who cues their emotions and does not engage their interlect. shut, down the liberies,offer only sound bit news and undervloped ideas. attention span decreases and welcome to the brave new world and the 1984 reality.
#6 Posted by henry kraft, CJR on Sun 24 Jun 2012 at 11:47 AM
Why not get the Morning Advocate from Baton Rouge to deliver to the New Orleans area? It has a great sports section and is fairly conserevative. The T P has published nothing of value to the northshore readers for the past several years.
#7 Posted by carl cucullu, CJR on Thu 12 Jul 2012 at 01:17 PM