Murdoch’s hacking scandal flared up again today, as News Corporation paid out millions of pounds worth of settlements to victims of News of the World crimes, which now include computer hacking.
A high court judge said the Murdoch-owned company behind the News of the World had made “an admission of sorts” that it engaged in a deliberate cover-up of evidence relating to phone hacking, on the day that the publisher paid an estimated seven figures in damages to settle 37 phone-hacking claims brought by public figures ranging from Jude Law to John Prescott.
Mr Justice Vos, the judge presiding over the hacking cases, told News Group Newspapers (NGN) he had seen evidence which raised “compelling questions about whether you concealed, told lies, actively tried to get off scot free.”
The judge ordered the company to search a number of computers which he said could contain evidence that its executives deliberately tried to destroy evidence of phone hacking, saying that he had seen emails which showed a “startling approach to the email record of NGN”.
In other words, the settlements hardly means Rupert’s done with this mess. This story is a long way from over.
— The Huffington Post’s Peter S. Goodman has a good piece juxtaposing the GOP presidential campaign in South Carolina with a visit to the unemployment line there:
From inside this stultifying space, the campaign in this electorally crucial Southern state might just as well be happening on some other planet. Many of the people massed here dismiss the candidates as something like characters on an irritating reality television show seen only while flipping channels. They are occupied with the daily struggle to pay bills minus a paycheck. But ask people about Gingrich’s rhetoric and that of other candidates who voice similar positions, and many vent disgust at intimations that their joblessness amounts to a chosen lifestyle financed by the taxpayer. As if they have chosen to be without work for months and years at a time.“Are we here just ‘cause we like coming here?” says Stephen Ballard, who lost his job installing air conditioners in December, surrendering a roughly $500-a-week paycheck for a $179-a-week unemployment check. “If you think there’s jobs down here, come down and show us.”
“The rich stay with the rich,” he says. “They don’t socialize with people outside their circle.”
The candidates cannot hear such critiques. They are perpetually elsewhere — at yacht clubs on the coast and at town halls down the freeway, on the steps of the state Capitol less than a mile away, and in ballrooms like the one inside the downtown Marriott, where Gingrich describes the long-term unemployed as people who have lost the will to work.
— Yesterday it was John Gapper, today it’s David Pogue calling out the internet hysteria over SOPA:
In other words, the protests were effective. There’s no chance that the bills will become law in their current forms.
But it was a sloppy success; the scare language used by some of the Web sites was just as flawed as the Congressional language that they opposed. (I actually have sympathy—just a tiny bit—for the music business’s frustration. It was put nicely by Cary Sherman, chief executive of the Recoding Industry Association of America: “It’s very difficult to counter the misinformation when the disseminators also own the platform.”)…
In the new world of Internet versus government, the system worked; the people spoke, government listened, and that’s good. But let’s do it responsibly, people. Both sides have an obligation to do the right thing.
Gapper’s is better, but it’s nice to see one of the gadget geeks saying something like this.
Poor RIAA. My heart bleeds for the poor unfortunate souls. Oh wait. No it doesn't.
Sorry @Ryan. RIAA burned its bridges years ago; there is no good will left in the world for these sharks and scalawags. They thought they were going to buy themselves a bunch of Congress critters on the sly and nobody would be the wiser. Of course, they could have developed a partnership with other stakeholders for workable solutions BEFORE their little scheme was set in motion. But no. They didn't bother with that, and they don't actually want a workable solution that takes into account the needs of other stakeholders. It's good to see the pushback worked, for a change.
“It’s very difficult to counter the misinformation when the disseminators also own the platform.”
Yeah, tell me about it.
#1 Posted by James, CJR on Thu 19 Jan 2012 at 11:18 PM
Wow I am surprised at your dislike for the SOPA protests. The articles you link to also. Really makes me wonder why you stance on this is such a centrist view point.
#2 Posted by johnson, CJR on Fri 20 Jan 2012 at 08:36 AM
In exchange for effectively perpetual copyright on a 90-year-old cartoon mouse, the criminalization of private civil disputes, and the ability to have other people's content taken down based on little more than say-so... the copyright cartels have treated Congresspersons and lobbying firms quite nicely, as if that satisfied their obligations to society, and handed the rest of us shoddier and shoddier products: fungible "stars" instead of talent, Auto-Tune instead of voice lessons, imitation instead of creativity, endless remakes instead of originality, destruction of prints instead of letting them slip into the public domain. To find the real talent and creativity, you have to step outside the sharecropping of the content industry.
What part of "copyright is a balance" is not being understood here? Frankly the copyright cartel and any other company that's ever engaged in multi-year lobbying of national government to shirk their obligations to not only the general public but to the talent they depend on deserves to have their ill-gotten gains returned to the public or destroyed. The corporate veil and limited liability are a bargain, not a right.
#3 Posted by Jonathan, CJR on Fri 20 Jan 2012 at 11:14 AM
“The rich stay with the rich,” he says. “They don’t socialize with people outside their circle.”
I know its off topic, but that might explain this:
http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/01/20/us-usa-holder-mortgage-idUSTRE80J0PH20120120
"U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder and Lanny Breuer, head of the Justice Department's criminal division, were partners for years at a Washington law firm that represented a Who's Who of big banks and other companies at the center of alleged foreclosure fraud, a Reuters inquiry shows."
#4 Posted by Thimbles, CJR on Fri 20 Jan 2012 at 12:34 PM
Beyond SOPA/PIPA itself, it seems the mainstream (non-technical) press is largely missing an opportunity, a valuable and transient opportunity, to use current events to illuminate how Washington works more broadly.
First, it's been a hole in the PR wall. Because the issue's mainstream visibility has gone from zero to lots so very suddenly, the PR professionals haven't had a chance to polish everyone's rough edges. To tell folks, "you just can't say that publicly". The MPAA crowd is momentarily the antithesis of a well-disciplined and on-message group (for reasons I'll skip).
So, for instance. A reoccurring claim is "donations only buy access, not votes". Which sounds at least plausible. And yet here we have industry leaders being angry -- public, on the record, self-described angry -- that after they donated a lot of money, the Obama administration expressed hesitancy about their legislation. And had better change it's tune quickly if it wants more cash. They're not complaining of diminished access. All on the record, but little in the press.
And the opportunity is transient. Back in 2009, when Sony's CEO Lynton said "I'm a guy who doesn't see anything good having come from the Internet. Period.", it got a lot of tech press coverage, but little mainstream. Even so, within a couple of weeks, there was a PR-compliant follow-up. The current spate of unguarded honesty, startled and self-righteously indignant, isn't going to last. Days at most. If the press wants to do anything more than maybe mine it afterwards, now's the time.
Second, it's been a non-partisan failure. The irrationality and incompetence of Washington policy making is often attributed to partisan politics. And yet here we have an issue, with much of the usual dysfunction, that has been quite non-partisan. (Though that looks to be changing, perhaps rapidly). It could help us tease apart structural causes from political ones. If anyone wanted to cover it.
So, it seems the mainstream press is overlooking nice story opportunities. Ones which the tech press and blogs are having no trouble finding quotable material on. And even if the mainstream press is limited to horse racing stories, how about "How will the Obama administration make up with a key but angry funder, without alienating a key age demographic? Will Republicans cultivate it as a wedge issue?".
It's been very strange to see political players being so unvarnishedly honest. And lashing out so. And with so little mainstream press attention.
#5 Posted by Mitchell, CJR on Sat 21 Jan 2012 at 09:51 PM