In our recent perusing of the business magazines, two stories on child labor stuck out, one by Forbes and the other by Fortune. The pieces are notable for their departure from a general trend of the business press: a seeming aversion to labor issues. Given that the business press has not shown a sustained interest in such things, the almost simultaneous appearance of these two excellent stories piqued our interest.

We don’t have much of a theory on why they appeared now, or whether this represents an actual trend—we also think back to impressive investigative work on forced labor in Latin America, appearing in 2006 and 2007 in Bloomberg Markets. Is the business press-reading public really becoming more interested in who made those tchotchkes from Target? Maybe. We would like to think so. We would also like to think that the business press is willing to sate that curiosity.

Forbes published a cover story in its February 25 issue on child labor in India, and the Fortune Web site ran a mid-February piece on child labor in the Ivory Coast chocolate industry. We’re not sure why the piece didn’t make the magazine itself, but we were nonetheless glad to see it. Fine photos accompanied each story.

Let’s start in the cotton fields of India.

Monsanto has received much more coverage for its genetic engineering practices than for its use of child labor. But the Forbes article, by Megha Bahree, connects the two, telling us that in India children are doing the tedious work of cross-pollinating cotton plants genetically engineered to be pest-resistant.

Kids will work for next to nothing, Bahree explains, introducing us first to Jyothi Ramulla Naga, who “says she’s 15 but looks no older than 12.” We find Jyothi bent over the cotton plants in a Monsanto field, where she has been working since her father committed suicide five years earlier. He was, we learn, a cotton farmer who had incurred large debts.

Jyothi is hardly alone. She might work in a field labeled “Monsanto India Limited Child Labour Free Fields,” but fellow teen laborers are not unusual on local Monsanto farms.

And the problem doesn’t stop with Monsanto.

Last year 420,000 laborers under the age of 18 were employed in cottonseed farms in four states across India, estimates Glocal Research, a consultancy in Hyderabad that monitors agricultural labor conditions. Of that total 54% were under the age of 14 and illegally employed.

But that’s not the sum of it, either.

The article also addresses other industries, like carpet weaving and stonecutting, that regularly employ children whose U.S. or European counterparts are far more likely to be in school. And in return for a job like stonecutting, which doesn’t just take children away from school but also endangers their health, the children literally get pennies.

Despite efforts by government and nonprofits, and sometimes even companies themselves, millions of Indian children stock our shelves with all kinds of goods. The Indian government estimates that 12.6 million of the country’s children under the age of fourteen work. Nonprofits say 50 million.

And while the article focuses on India, the problem extends far beyond that country, Bahree tells us.

The UN International Labor Organization guesses that there are 218 million child laborers worldwide, 7 in 10 of them in agriculture, followed by service businesses (22%) and industry (9%).

Bahree gives us the human faces of a problem, then pulls back and gives us the context. One reason we are going out of our way to praise human-rights journalism is that it appeared on the cover of a major business magazine. Bahree is a staff reporter for Forbes and has done interesting labor reporting for that magazine in the past. But generally, we see far too little coverage of labor issues in the business press.

The same goes for the Fortune story, “Chocolate’s bittersweet economy,” by Christian Parenti, whose international reporting on subjects like the human toll of war typically appear in The Nation.

Elinore Longobardi is a Fellow and staff writer of The Audit, the business-press section of Columbia Journalism Review.