ProPublica has a terrific report today nailing Ally Financial (the former GMAC) for faking mortgage documents in order to foreclose on a homeowner.
Paul Kiel gets hold of internal documents that show Ally (ProPublica refers to it throughout as GMAC for some reason) wanted to foreclose on a mortgage originated by Ameriquest, but couldn’t find the paperwork showing that it really owned the loan. So it just made one up:
“The problem is we do not have signing authority—are there any other options?” Jeffrey Stephan, the head of GMAC’s “Document Execution” team, wrote to another employee and the law firm pursuing the foreclosure action. No solutions were offered.
Three months later, GMAC had an answer. It filed a document with New York City authorities that said the delinquent Ameriquest loan had been assigned to it “effective of” August 2005. The document was dated July 7, 2010, three years after Ameriquest had ceased to exist and was signed by Stephan, who was identified as a “Limited Signing Officer” for Ameriquest Mortgage Company. Soon after, GMAC filed for foreclosure.
We’ve talked before about how the foreclosure scandal, which broke in earnest last fall, shows that systemic fraud was being committed at every part of the mortgage chain, from origination to securitization to the foreclosures that were inevitable in large part because of the earlier fraud.
In that vein, it’s worth noting that notorious predatory lender Ameriquest (which failed early in the housing crash) originated the specific mortgage in question here. Mike Hudson in his book “The Monster: How a Gang of Predatory Lenders and Wall Street Bankers Fleeced America—and Spawned a Global Crisis”, documents in detail how Ameriquest ran amok, including by forging documents to put people in loans they couldn’t afford.
Kiel and ProPublica find serious problems in hundreds of other loans Roland Arnall’s company created for which servicers now apparently can’t find documents proving ownership:
An examination by ProPublica suggests this transaction was not unique. A review of court records in New York identified hundreds of similar assignment documents filed in the name of Ameriquest after 2008 by GMAC and other mortgage servicers.
It’s worth noting that Ally is the fifteenth biggest bank in the land, with $173 billion in assets, and ProPublica reports that it is still majority owned by the government after having to be bailed out during the crisis.
The evidence in this case is so damning that Ally cops to it. The kicker is that despite all this—despite acknowledging that its employees created a fake document to give it legal authority to foreclose—Ally is going to go ahead and foreclose:
Asked by ProPublica about the document, GMAC acknowledged Stephan did not have authority to sign on behalf of Ameriquest. The bank said it is still planning to push ahead with foreclosure on the homeowner, who remains in the property.
Company spokeswoman Gina Proia said an internal review last fall into “suspected documentation execution issues” had flagged the loan as problematic and that GMAC is “determining what needs to be done in order to receive the necessary authorization.”
“We will determine and complete the necessary steps to remediate and proceed with foreclosure,” Proia said.
Meantime, the employee who signed the fake document still works for Ally.
Why?
It’s clear that this is a serious issue, as Kiel reports:
In New York, it’s a felony to file a public record with “intent to deceive.”
“It’s fraud,” said Linda Tirelli, a consumer bankruptcy attorney. “I want to know who’s going to do a perp walk for recording this.”
Great work.

THANK GOD somebody is doing something. here in kentucky i don't see any of our congressmen or senator's doing 1 DAMN THING !!! we are victim's of mortgage/foreclosure fraud and now wrongful eviction. p.o.box-544 in danville, ky 40423
#1 Posted by douglas w. trantham, CJR on Thu 28 Jul 2011 at 01:24 AM
Ryan, I think it would be effective if CJR's website changed its practices in opinion. What I would suggest is a major editorial once a week. The topic I would choose for the first editorial is the strange practice at The WSJ (as revealed in my posts at your website) of hammering away at the rating agencies, for example, when the paper clearly has an interest in this matter, as has been in the news just recently. (Without explaining the interest.)
It would also be valuable to have a couple of solid op-eds per week on fundamental subjects. (Too much mediocre opinion attenuates the message.)
There seems to be an American innocence in areas such as language, cognition, and IT. I strongly recommend that both Columbia's journalism school and CJR have a formal set of English tools. The best, I think, are the COBUILD English Grammar, the Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English (with an excellent CD), and www.m-w.com. It is inexplicable that The NYT in its Education Life keeps circling around such pathetic trash as SAT and GMAT English.
Mark Ashcraft's "Cognition" is a great introduction to the subject.
I have my students work with Gmail (as Harvard has decided to do). I get them to design an address with no numbers: clayton.burns.cjr@gmail.com, for example. I would like them to master Twitter (The UK's Telegraph has reopened its phone hacking live blog. This blog is good with Twitter interventions and rows.)
I want my students to learn how to write for the Internet: 560 or 580 words per screen, carefully paragraphed in five or six units, with reasonably concrete text.
Every journalism school should have a reading course where students would close-read "The Turn of the Screw," "The Scarlet Letter," and "Heart of Darkness" (exclusive of prefatory material). These are by far the best short novels written in English. Students nowadays just can't read. Period.
Thanks. Clayton.
#2 Posted by Clayton Burns, CJR on Thu 28 Jul 2011 at 01:26 PM
@ Clayton: ???
Ryan: thanks for this & thanks to ProPub. Can I get a prosecution?
Amen.
#3 Posted by Edward Ericson Jr., CJR on Thu 28 Jul 2011 at 03:30 PM
Edward, I won't be able to get much traction on: "@ Clayton: ???" If you have any questions, I will answer them. Meanwhile, this is what happens when we discount language in journalism:
[After failing to cover first base during a Apri 1, 1999 exhibition game, Yankees owner George Steinbrenner called him a "fat, pussy toad" and banned him from a road trip to Los Angeles.]
http://www.nypost.com/p/sports/yankees/former_yankees_pitcher_irabu_dies_jR4pX5uALppc38cAKNPcjP#ixzz1TR0mBP3f
#4 Posted by Clayton Burns, CJR on Thu 28 Jul 2011 at 04:48 PM
Here's another interesting question regarding Ally's actions: Will nPR's Planet Money (their business blog and pod cast) continue to ignore and not report on their sole corporate sponsor's malfeasance?
My nPR Magic 8 Ball say "Most Likely".
#5 Posted by Grumpy Demo, CJR on Fri 29 Jul 2011 at 04:11 PM
No felony has occurred here people... Put down the pitchforks..
An essential criminal element (fraud) has not occurred in these false affidavits.
ALLY isn't trying to steal money... It's fudging the records to get money it is truly owed.. The homeowners really did default on their mortgages and ALLY really is owed the money.
New York (like most states) requires an element of "materiality" in order to sustain a felony conviction - a statement must be both false and material - and such an element is lacking here - the underlying claims are materially true.
Furthermore, in order to sustain a felony conviction, the statement must be made with the intent to mislead a public official in the administration of his or her duty.
These claims are lacking.. The best a prosecutor could hope for would be a misdemeanor conviction (a false statement is a misdemeanor in New York like driving on a suspended license) . Even if the D.A. could convince the cops to investigate these misdemeanors (good luck with that), there isn't a jury in the world that would convict one of these underlings in such a case. And even if the D.A. had a solid case, the judge would offer an ACD (Adjournment in Contemplation of Dismissal) before the case ever went to a jury - basically telling the defendant to go home and be good for six months and then have the case dismissed.
Sorry to bring the Reality Rain upon the Liberal Parade!..
#6 Posted by padikiller, CJR on Fri 29 Jul 2011 at 07:45 PM