I’ve written before about how press standards tend to go wobbly when it comes to Apple gossip.
Here’s a prime example (though it’s as much a Howard Stern story as an Apple one).
The Star-Ledger asks in a blog post this afternoon: “Is Howard Stern taking his show to iTunes?”
That’s a turn-your-head story if you’re into Stern, Apple, or media business. What’s the sourcing?
A single anonymous tweet:
The tweet originated under the name “SIRI Stock” and linked to a Sirius XM’s Investor Relations webpage.
We know the Star-Ledger knows better. It follows that immediately with this:
There is no absolutely no reason to believe the claim since anyone can say pretty much anything on the social web site.
But it apparently couldn’t help itself. Let’s put it this way: There is absolutely no excuse for reporting an anonymous tweet since anyone can say pretty much anything on the social web site.
Here’s the last paragraph:
It certainly sounds like bunk but an interesting rumor nonetheless. Let us know… Would you follow Howard to iTunes?
That doesn’t get you off the hook. Stories or posts like this just have the effect of furthering junk information out there, which is exactly what a news organization should not be doing, particularly when the tweet comes from something calling itself “Sirius Stock News.” That’s a red flag that it could be somebody trying to manipulate the market.
Worse, there’s no evidence the Star-Ledger did any reporting here.
All the more reason it should have left this one alone.
Well done. Someone who remembers what journalistic integrity actually stands for. You are soooooooo right when you scold the Star Ledger from writing this story in the first place. And this is the problem with the print media, in general. They will publish ANYTHING that will sell newspapers. Yes, these are very difficult times but your story should remind journalists about the integrity of reporting the news accurately and honestly. Especially when it comes to companies that are trading on the stock exchange like SIRI. Of course, one can see it was an obvious move to try and effect the share price negatively [SIRI is the most shorted stock in the market]. Good job in your reporting.
#1 Posted by JESSE NASH, CJR on Sat 4 Dec 2010 at 08:58 AM
"Worse, there’s no evidence the Star-Ledger did any reporting here."
--- That's the beauty of Twitter; it makes pretending to be a journalist much easier.
#2 Posted by Hardrada, CJR on Sat 4 Dec 2010 at 02:49 PM