The Los Angeles Times has a good story today about how U.S. forces in Iraq are shifting their attention away from combating Shiite militias and towards the Sunni group, Al Qaeda in Iraq. They reason that this bunch of mostly foreign terrorists are the ones most likely to make trouble following an American withdrawal.
I like when terms are clearly defined, especially when they are potentially misleading. As we’ve learned in the past few years, to claim to be part of “Al Qaeda” doesn’t necessarily mean you are receiving marching orders from Osama. But this is a fact easily forgotten. So it was good to see that the Times made sure we kept this in mind, adding this sentence to the bottom of the article’s sixth paragraph: “Despite its name, the extent of the group’s links to Osama bin Laden is unclear.”





Recent Comments
-
KrystalHyde22 on
What I Wanna Know: Scott Harshbarger
(3)
-
Donald I on
The Education of Herb And Marion Sandler
(9)
-
danny bloom on
Newser, The Fly on the Wall, and Aggregation
(2)
-
Linda Hughes on
Update on Medicare Advantage Plans
(31)
-
padikiller on
Social Security’s Code Words
(1)
-
Joe on
Problems in an NYT Column
(2)
-
Mark Richard on
Top Secret: The Battle for the Pentagon Papers
(5)
-
dianne on
Parsing the AP’s Health Care Primer
(1)
More