The Los Angeles Times has a good story today about how U.S. forces in Iraq are shifting their attention away from combating Shiite militias and towards the Sunni group, Al Qaeda in Iraq. They reason that this bunch of mostly foreign terrorists are the ones most likely to make trouble following an American withdrawal.
I like when terms are clearly defined, especially when they are potentially misleading. As we’ve learned in the past few years, to claim to be part of “Al Qaeda” doesn’t necessarily mean you are receiving marching orders from Osama. But this is a fact easily forgotten. So it was good to see that the Times made sure we kept this in mind, adding this sentence to the bottom of the article’s sixth paragraph: “Despite its name, the extent of the group’s links to Osama bin Laden is unclear.”





Recent Comments
-
Grammar Police on
Jumping to Confusion
(8)
-
Charles on
The Devil in the Details, Part II
(3)
-
Mike Holloway on
Sanjay Gupta on Cheating Death
(8)
-
Thimbles on
The State of Democratic Discourse, Part 952
(8)
-
Thimbles on
Unscientific America Meets Denialism
(3)
-
James Qwest on
A Bushel and a Beck
(12)
-
JLD on
Health Reform Lessons from Massachusetts, Part IX
(5)
-
Montana on
Nidal Malik Hasan
(61)
More