I agree with you, Greg: from what I’ve seen of the Atlantic Wire, it seems to be, as you say, “a useful digest of elite opinion.” In this age of overload, aggregators are—almost as a rule—useful, and the aggregation of opinion is no less helpful to us bleary-eyed, link-addled news consumers than the aggregation of news itself. Real Clear Politics and its ilk could use some company—and some competitors. From that perspective: Right on, Atlantic Wire.

But, then. To the extent that aggregation is an inclusive endeavor, it must also, of course, be an exclusive one; and the ‘elite’ element of the Wire’s attempt to be a one-stop shop for opinion—expressly by focusing on “the columnists and commentators leading the national dialogue”—does, I have to say, give me some pause.

Take “The Atlantic 50,” the collection of pundits whom Atlantic Wire has dubbed its “all-star team.” I hate to be, you know, that guy…but I can’t help but notice how generally old and white and male are the denizens of that list. (Out of the fifty, there are nine women—18 percent of the total; three people of color—6 percent; and no intersection between the two.) That’s not the fault of The Atlantic, of course; the list was determined, it says, by an algorithm based on a pundit’s influence, reach, and Web engagement, and is a pretty fair reflection of the way the world works right now. But, still: It’s just a tad ironic that a service that purports to glorify “the boldest ideas and bravest thinkers of the day” seems also—from a demographic perspective, at least—to endorse, rather than challenge, the status quo.

If you'd like to get email from CJR writers and editors, add your email address to our newsletter roll and we'll be in touch.

Megan Garber is an assistant editor at the Nieman Journalism Lab at Harvard University. She was formerly a CJR staff writer.