Looks like the long, awkward freeze-out is over. The New York Times will finally get its interview with the president. We’re not quite sure what the sit-down’s topic will be at this point, but we can pretty safely assume that the conversation will consist mostly of tentative “where do we go from here?” discussions and ecstatic “God, I really missed you” declarations. Followed by, obviously, phenomenal make-up access.
01:19 PM - March 6, 2009
The President and the Gray Lady: Reunited (and It Feels So Good…)
Virginian-Pilot journalists: Corporate management pressure is stifling coverage - “Lovers of journalism in this newsroom are pissed. It’s bad.”
The worst journalism of 2014 - A recap of the year’s most cringeworthy news blunders
Why the media don’t get Detroit—and why it matters - Coverage of declining cities is too often simplistic and lacking historical context
21st-century censorship - Governments around the world are using stealthy strategies to manipulate the media
Jesse Brown punctures Canada’s media bubble - The independent journalist uses his website and podcast to break stories that might otherwise go unpublished
Email blasts from CJR writers and editors
“It should be made clear, in law, that the tasks security reseachers do to make the net more secure and journalists do to understand and contextualize the truth for the public are not crimes”
People have become less trusting of major institutions, according to the annual Edelman Trust Barometer. And large majorities doubt that businesses want to make the world a better place.
Public editor Margaret Sullivan on why the paper should have published the images.
“I feel the need to offer my perspective as someone who is not a teenager but who has thought about these issues extensively for years.”
Greg Marx discusses democracy and news with Tom Rosenstiel of the American Press Institute
Who Owns What
A report from the Columbia University Graduate School of Journalism
Questions and exercises for journalism students.
Hey millionaire tech bros: Have patience with the editorial process – Chris Hughes probably wanted to enable great journalism at first. Then the dust settled and before you know it, he’s shaking everything up again