In 2006 Adrian Holovaty, then a programmer and journalist of some reputation, wrote a blog post entitled, “A fundamental way newspaper sites need to change.” In the five years since he published it, Holovaty went on to win a Knight News Challenge grant, launch EveryBlock, sell it to MSNBC.com, and become one of the leading programmer/journalists working today. As the years passed, his post crystallized to become one of the more important, and prophetic, pieces of writing about what we now call data journalism.
Holovaty wrote:
So much of what local journalists collect day-to-day is structured information: the type of information that can be sliced-and-diced, in an automated fashion, by computers. Yet the information gets distilled into a big blob of text — a newspaper story — that has no chance of being repurposed.what I mean by structured data: information with attributes that are consistent across a domain. Every fire has those attributes, just as every reported crime has many attributes, just as every college basketball game has many attributes.
This view has come to be accepted and championed by many important people and organizations. There are today many efforts to bring structure to all manner of information, and there’s of course lots of work left to be done. Notably, one slice of data that still lacks structure in the United States relates to journalists themselves.
We each have attributes like a phone number, e-mail address, title, beat, employment history, voting history, education history, Twitter username, published articles and reporting, frequently quoted sources… The list goes on.
These attributes don’t tell the whole story of a journalist, just as a box score doesn’t encapsulate a sports game. But they are material to the whole. And they are, for the most part, unavailable or at the very least disorganized and distributed. Unstructured, as Holovaty might say.
This reality was highlighted thanks to a recently launched effort by Ira Stoll, the former New York Sun vice president and managing editor who now runs FutureOfCapitalism.com. His new project is News Transparency, a website that seeks to act as a central database for the attributes of American journalists. Anyone can create a profile for a journalist or add to an existing profile. People can also offer feedback on the quality of a journalist’s work, or make note of a prediction made by the journalist.
“This site aims to improve the accuracy, quality, and transparency of journalism by making it easier to find out about the individual human beings who produce the news — human beings with opinions, relationships, history, and agendas,” reads the site’s about page. “That information should help readers, viewers, and listeners put what they are reading in better context, and it may even prompt some improvements by the journalists.”
News Transparency’s launch received a decent amount of press attention, with Poynter, Forbes, AFP and others writing about it. When I called Stoll recently to check in on the launch, he was on the other line with a French reporter. He said traffic on the site has been more international than expected.
That isn’t entirely surprising. The U.K. has been home to a similar site, Journalisted, since 2007. Journalisted describes itself as “an independent, not-for-profit website built to make it easier for you, the public, to find out more about journalists and what they write about.” Perhaps there are folks out there who have been waiting to see a little structure brought to American journalists.
Overall, the online trend is towards disclosing more information about journalists. News sites are putting journalist’s photos, e-mails, Twitter accounts, and other contact and connection information with a byline. Forbes’s new article page includes prominent merchandizing of the reporter’s information and most popular work. Google recently announced it will use the Google+ profiles of journalists to add byline information in Google News.

I think the most interested users of this db will be PR practitioners.
#1 Posted by Edward Ericson Jr., CJR on Mon 21 Nov 2011 at 11:34 AM
[That kind of overlay could add interesting context to the reporting we encounter online. But, at the risk of sounding like I’m trying to move people away from Still’s site, there is an opportunity for news organizations to build internal databases of this information and take a role in offering a new, meaningful level of disclosure and information about their journalists and the topics and people they cover.]
OK. Still's site.
Edward: Why not study "Microstyle" by Christopher Johnson and write a comment for CJR? Thanks. Clayton.
#2 Posted by Clayton Burns, CJR on Mon 21 Nov 2011 at 12:07 PM
Slow moving in not having a profile for Romenesko yet:
Search Results:
No profile exists yet for romenesko.
Create a new profile for romenesko.
Even if we had all the minutiae about a journalist, we "still" would not necessarily be making much headway. In the future, reality will be in another space. I suspect. Here is an edited version (I scanned it. I was mildly interested):
[Ira Stoll Age: 38 Average Member Rating: (2 member reviews)
Edit InfoFacebook Page: http://www.facebook.com/ira.stoll
Edit InfoTwitter Account: @IraStoll
Edit InfoPhone Number: 718 499 2199
Edit InfoEmail Address: ira@futureofcapitalism.com
Edit InfoCountry: United States
Edit InfoFrequent Topics of Writing: Business / Economics
Politics
Add a Book Books by Ira Stoll: Samuel Adams: A Life
Edit InfoWork History: Harvard Crimson Los Angeles Times The Forward
Jerusalem Post Wall Street Journal New York Sun FutureOfCapitalism
Edit InfoWebsites/Blogs:Smarter Times FutureOfCapitalism.com
Seth Lipsky].
#3 Posted by Clayton Burns, CJR on Mon 21 Nov 2011 at 12:41 PM
Thanks for spotting that typo, Clayton. We're getting it fixed.
#4 Posted by Craig Silverman, CJR on Mon 21 Nov 2011 at 12:50 PM
Edward's right about PR people being interested in this -- they're already doing it. I was recently given a sales presentation (by phone) by Vocus PR, which offers what you're talking about -- sophisticated software/database with detailed info about journalists, everything from their educational background to their interests to what they're saying on social media -- and helps clients track their approaches to each journalist. They have a team of researchers constantly updating the database.
#5 Posted by Jaclyn, CJR on Mon 21 Nov 2011 at 01:02 PM
Thanks, Craig. Jaclyn, A very interesting comment.
I can't emphasize enough that I think that Christopher Johnson's "Microstyle: The Art of Writing Little" is an excellent focusing text.
It should be swarmed by CJR for its insights.
Journalists should shed their inertia and make a far more determined effort to teach themselves and their readers the style of the future.
#6 Posted by Clayton Burns, CJR on Mon 21 Nov 2011 at 01:29 PM
"I can't emphasize enough that I think that Christopher Johnson's "Microstyle: The Art of Writing Little" is an excellent focusing text."
Everyone with a cell phone and a twitter account is versed in the art of writting little, LOL.
KTHNXBYE!!11!!
#7 Posted by Thimbles, CJR on Mon 21 Nov 2011 at 01:59 PM
Really, "Thimbles?" Is this an attempt to spark a meretricious "flareup"?
Christopher Johnson has an obviously well-earned doctorate from Berkeley in linguistics. He writes intelligently on sound symbolism, which interests me.
We shoot from the hip at CJR reader comments, do we? Anything that moves, open fire. When you hit your foot, which is always, move on to more wild and shallow statements.
We are going to need moderation at this site.
And a little bit of digging, to find out what the trolls are trying to achieve.
#8 Posted by Clayton Burns, CJR on Mon 21 Nov 2011 at 03:56 PM
That just read to me like a harmless joke, Clayton. But the Johnson book does sound interesting. I'll check it out.
#9 Posted by Justin Peters, CJR on Mon 21 Nov 2011 at 04:06 PM
"That just read to me like a harmless joke, Clayton."
I try not to be serious when I can avoid it.
#10 Posted by Thimbles, CJR on Mon 21 Nov 2011 at 04:39 PM
Thought my initial comment was brief, on topic and straight forward. Not sure why Clay thought it fodder for his pitch of Johnson's book.
I have limited interest in that kind of thing, "style of the future" though it may be. I did read "Words That Work" by Frank Luntz, who is a highly skilled putz. I also read a lot of advertisements. So I get my fill.
Gonna try to spend more time with poetry.
#11 Posted by Edward Ericson Jr., CJR on Tue 22 Nov 2011 at 01:34 PM
I suspect Ed's right, but it's worth noting that they already have lots of these services out there that charge decent money to pull a journalist's bio.
I had a flack friend pull mine once back in 2003 or so. I was shocked (and creeped out) at how much info they had--about 50% of it was flat wrong, including, thankfully, that my grandma had died a few months earlier.
#12 Posted by Ryan Chittum, CJR on Tue 22 Nov 2011 at 01:55 PM
Clay likes to pitch fodder.
One of his frequent lapses.
"Words That Work" by Frank Luntz: Since I think that you are a thoughtful person, Edward, I will read it and get back to you.
Christopher Johnson is excellent on sound symbolism. If California universities integrated cognition, English, and linguistics so as to produce three sound system tools for our language, that would be an earth-shaking revolution for our much-parasitized tongue.
A thirty-lyric Internet database with video. "Speaking Cosmetics Talk." And "Macbeth." The other way of doing it is the Cambridge UP "Clear Speech." Quite sad junk.
Let's settle on some poems to discuss: "Ode to a Nightingale." "The Sick Rose." "Sailing to Byzantium."
#13 Posted by Clayton Burns, CJR on Tue 22 Nov 2011 at 02:25 PM