Kevin Pang reviews cheeseburgers for the Chicago Tribune—in print, online, and as the creator and host of a video program called, aptly, The Cheeseburger Show. In the process of pursuing his beat, he has become adept at assessing patty construction, meat density, grind caliber, and the many other variables that can make or break a cheeseburger. “It’s gotten to the point where I can dissect a burger better than anybody in this town,” he boasts.
Although officially a features reporter, the twenty-eight-year-old Pang has taken to calling himself the Tribune’s “cheeseburger bureau chief.” In person, he exudes affability, with a quick wit that serves to disguise the extent of his professional ambition. (He’s prone to pulling all-nighters in the Tribune Tower.) He is thick-set, but not as much as you might think, a feat he attributes to the “taste-and-toss” method of burger reviewing.
Pang has a showman’s knack for spectacle. In college, he spent his weekends performing impromptu magic shows at fraternity parties. Last year, he coordinated the Tribune’s efforts to sabotage a contest sponsored by the rival Chicago Sun-Times. (The Sun-Times asked readers to submit videos explaining, in song, why the Tribune Company shouldn’t sell naming rights to Wrigley Field; Pang put a cute intern into a Cubs jersey and produced a video that won the contest.) “People were cheering [in the newsroom],” he says, recalling the scene upon learning that the Tribune had successfully punked the Sun-Times. “Kind of like a dugout when somebody hits a home run.”
He started at the Tribune in 2005, spending a year on the metro desk until a benevolent editor spirited him away “to write about food and get massages.” The burger beat began when Pang noticed that Web readers loved the Tribune’s fast-food reviews. “Any time we wrote about fast food, it’d become the most-read story that day,” he recalls. “Forget Obama, forget North Korea. People wanted to read about burgers.”
His cheeseburger coverage varies according to his medium. In his written reviews, Pang grades the burgers on more-or-less objective criteria. Because, after a certain point, all burgers start to look the same, he has taken to photographing each sandwich as it is served, which helps him remember what he ate and where. When reviewing, he eschews pad and pen and takes notes on his BlackBerry, as if he were composing a quick lunchtime e-mail. This is done not so much for anonymity as for cleanliness: “Usually, when I write, it gets really greasy,” he says.
Pang can be a staunch cheeseburger traditionalist, as in a recent review of Phil’s Kastle Monster Burger with Cheese: “There is nothing wrong with the idea of ‘no frills.’ I, seeker of meat-filled wonder, need not the next incarnation of sliced bread to be enlightened.”
He is often effusive when praising impressive sandwiches: “At some point (probably around the black truffle mayo), this burger ceased to be just a burger and became a Maserati between two buns.”
Occasionally, he is severe: “The syrupy sweet glaze masked a rubbery beef patty that tasted as if it came in bulk from the Costco freezer.”
That last line, from a review of Bennigan’s Guinness Glazed Bacon Cheeseburger, is an outlier. As a general principle, Pang avoids writing negative reviews. “Restaurants are struggling,” he reasons. “One bad review can still shut the whole thing down.” (Don’t blame Pang for Bennigan’s financial troubles—the chain was in bankruptcy well before he savaged their bacon burger.)
His work with The Cheeseburger Show is more digressive. As host, he affects a persona that is equal parts Tom Green and Alton Brown. The show, which can be found both online and as fifteen-minute segments on the Tribune-owned cable station CLTV, usually begins with a brief comedy bit, followed by interviews with local food experts, followed by Pang eating a cheeseburger and describing how it tastes.

It's not Pang's fault but this is a total disgrace. The Chicago Tribune used to be better than this. This is totally bush league. Chicago Tribune RIP.
#1 Posted by giornalista, CJR on Fri 10 Jul 2009 at 11:21 PM
It's not Pang's fault but this is a total disgrace. The Chicago Tribune used to stand for respectable journalism. No more. RIP
#2 Posted by giornalista, CJR on Fri 10 Jul 2009 at 11:25 PM
It's not Pang's fault, but he's a fraud. This is a total disgrace. The Tribune is a joke,
#3 Posted by giornalista, CJR on Fri 10 Jul 2009 at 11:31 PM
I'm old and sometimes that helps (often, it's just sort of unpleasant to be old, smile).
In this case, it helps me remember that newspapers have always been a mix of the serious and the silly and that has been part of their charm.
In the old days, I can remember the pictures, in the winter, of bikini-clad Australians with the inevitable cutline: "It's summer down under." And there were truly dumb contests - if you stretch way back to pre-WWII, you'll find newspapers that sponsored such sophisticated events as flagpole sitting.
Keep in mind that the best and worst thing about newspapers has always been this: They reflect what the readers find amusing or interesting.
A cheeseburger beat? Truth? It sounds like a great idea and obviously is working. And it's good to remind ourselves - especially in these times - that (as long as there is other content to balance it) there's a lot to be said for doing something that appeals to the masses.
#4 Posted by Bill Husted, CJR on Sat 11 Jul 2009 at 08:07 AM
Pang is a mediocre reporter and an average writer. He's not very experienced, young and cheap. Exactly the kind of person on the Trib's fast track these days.
#5 Posted by Former Trib Guy, CJR on Sat 11 Jul 2009 at 11:21 AM
Before you old folks hyperventilate about how the Tribune is "below" this, remember that this is in the FOOD section.
#6 Posted by Johnny Bravo, CJR on Sat 11 Jul 2009 at 04:01 PM
I am surprised you failed to point out the incredibly racist opening of the cheeseburger show. If you watch the first episode, Pang walks around Michigan avenue as a lost, thickly accented Asian tourist asking "Squeeze please, cheeseburger?" Why was this omitted from the CJR story? Sure, Pang is an Asian-American, but it seems a bit questionable for a news organization to publish something in such poor taste. Everyone knows that the Tribune is circling the drain, but why is the Columbia Journalism Review following it? Please do your homework.
#7 Posted by Charlie, CJR on Sat 11 Jul 2009 at 04:42 PM
Many contemporary newspaper readers get off on reportage that blurs the lines between info-tainment and pure drivel. Just Look at where Trib has placed its whimsical, facetious "The Talk" page.
Front and center. So it must be working.
"Important" reporting isn't limited to highbrow, watchdog or marketplace news anymore. Fact is, "Important" reporting now means "the stuff that keeps people buyin' the papers."
Apparently, a "Cheeseburger Bureau Chief" does that. If that's pa it's pandering, it's got the Trib laughing all the way to the bank.
And you're reading it, sucker.
#8 Posted by Ima Doink, CJR on Sat 11 Jul 2009 at 05:01 PM
Many contemporary newspaper readers get off on reportage that blurs the lines between info-tainment and pure drivel. Just Look at where Trib has placed its whimsical, facetious "The Talk" page.
Front and center. So it must be working.
"Important" reporting isn't limited to highbrow, watchdog or marketplace news anymore. Fact is, "Important" reporting now means "the stuff that keeps people buyin' the papers."
Apparently, a "Cheeseburger Bureau Chief" does that. If that's pandering, it's pandering that's got the Trib laughing all the way to the bank.
And you're reading it, sucker.
#9 Posted by Ima Doink, CJR on Sat 11 Jul 2009 at 05:04 PM
Actually, "Ima," I'm not reading it. I'm among the thousands that canceled my Trib subscription in the past year. And it's not that I think the Tribune is below this or that this is just some feature in the food section (although it actually gets very prominent play on the Web site).
The Trib has shuttered bureaus foreign and domestic. It has turned its Pulitzer-winner investigative team into a "consumer watchdog" team. The managing editor has never been a beat reporter - not at the Trib, not anyplace. The paper readers like every major decision is run by a focus group.
So am I surprised that the paper has a reporter whose job is choosing the best cheesburgers? No, I'm more surprised that there isn't also beer critic or one devoted to reviewing uTube videos. Perhaps if they closed the Springfield bureau they could devote resources to these two areas that would no doubt have many interested readers.
#10 Posted by Former Trib Guy, CJR on Sat 11 Jul 2009 at 05:24 PM
Former: You must be former for a good reason. You may be more experienced than Pang, but you're probably expensive and set in your tired old ways. The show isn't exactly my cup of tea either, but at least he's trying something new and the readers/viewers are responding.
You make it sound like there's one reporter devoted to just burgers or as a beer critic or YouTube reporter (or as you called it -- uTube, guess you weren't a Former Copy Editor). Everyone in the newsroom is juggling multiple assignments and beats. They just had the restaurant critic review the book fair, for crying out loud. It's not so much shifting resources and priorities, but reporters and editors doing three times as much as before, and being jacks of all trades, even if part of those responsibilities include YouTube, burgers or beers.
And what in your mind is the difference between an "investigative" team and a "consumer watchdog" team? With 18 people now on the latter, no less? For a mean who dealt with words daily, sounds like you're quibbling over semantics.
#11 Posted by Current Trib Guy, CJR on Sat 11 Jul 2009 at 08:05 PM
Yum! Sounds like you can't get enough of that Trib Kool Aid.
You call it semantics. Guess all those tens of thousands of people who have canceled their subscriptions over the last couple years are hung up on the same silly semantics.
I don't see you defending the journalistic cred of your managing editor. And if you really don't see a difference between an investigative team that uncovered serious wrongdoing in the health care industry, police wrongdoing and prosecutorial misconduct and a consumer team . . . well, I'd say you have a future in Tribune management.
Yes, experienced reporters are expensive. Because they have skills and knowledge that only come with time. They have the ability to look at arrest records and realize something isn't right. They have the experience (and balls) to stand up to a career, successful prosecutor and tell him he's put innocent men on death row. But you're right, that sort of journalism is soooo 20th century.
FWIW, I left Trib of my own accord and have found a new profession that pays me better than my days in the Tower. And I have the added benefit of not waiting for more cutbacks every quarter. But I believe serious journalsim is important, for our country and our city. The Trib has done some really nice work on the UofI admissions scandal. The environmental and health reporting are first rate. But if you seriously want to argue that other areas of the newspaper have not been diminished (business coverage? Washington? Springfield?) then you really are a management toady.
Have another round of Kool Aid on me.
#12 Posted by Former Trib Guy, CJR on Sat 11 Jul 2009 at 09:03 PM
Well said Former Trib Guy. To current Trib guy, do you really think your multi-tasking will continue to save you? I am sure that when you find yourself without a job (which will happen) then you won't be so quick to defend these people. The current management is a joke. Stop playing the "old journalists don't get it" card. That is too easy and within the current Tribune paradigm, incorrect. The fact of the matter is there is nothing you can or will do that will save your job. What you can save however, is your dignity. Something Pang seems to severely lack, hence his current, albeit thin, recognition.
#13 Posted by charlie (actually former Trib guy #2), CJR on Sat 11 Jul 2009 at 11:30 PM
More examples of Former Trib Guy being set in his tired old ways. A freshman business major can understand this: Declining advertising revenue = diminished newsroom budget. Where do you propose we get this money from? From the 50,000 extra Sunday papers we sell from the 20-part investigative project with daily double trucks that took you three years to report? From that First Amendment tree with the dollar bills hanging off of it? You don't seem to have an answer either. We have less money to spend. Do we keep spending on 1999 levels of staffing and go in the red? Declining circulation, as you suggest is the reason for the Trib's current woe, is about fifth down on a list of reasons why this paper, and every newspaper, is tanking.
And let's get back to the original point. This is NOT reporting on Hamas or Blagojevich or Fannie Mae or United Airlines. This is in the food section. The features section. You know, the one with the comics, recipes and advice columnists.
Glad you're not in our newsroom anymore. Good riddance.
#14 Posted by Current Trib Guy, CJR on Sat 11 Jul 2009 at 11:34 PM
Current Guy has a point, that the Cheeseburger Critic is a novelty act along with the comics and the recipes. That kind of silliness should be a luxury in the valuable newspaper real estate. The problem is that Current and his management seem to think it's the ticket to success. Here's the truth. People tire of that kind of thin crap pretty quickly. And it cheapens what ALL of your colleagues do. So if you think sitting next to the Cheeseburger critic is the ticket to a successful career, think again.
What is enduring is quality journalism that makes a difference in the lives of the people of the community. And serious journalism does that. And when it is gone, people miss it, and are driven online to search out the kind of news they need. And that is a loss for your newspaper and your city, when people really NEED the important news and it isn't to be had in the thin, cheapened, throwaway that the Tribune and many other newspapers have become.
#15 Posted by Former Subscriber, CJR on Sun 12 Jul 2009 at 01:08 AM
This argument is pointless. What I believe is the primary mission of newspapers is derided as tired old ways. As I said, such a 20th century way of looking at things. I'm arguing that you need the meat and potatoes on your plate before reaching for a piece of cheesecake. You're arguing that everyone loves cheesecake and we really can't afford the whole meal, so skip the meat and potatoes.
Hey - I want both. And so do a lot of other readers.
Current Trib Guy, I really do hope the Tribune rights its financial ship. I wish it would follow the model of the NY Times (another troubled financial institution) which has plenty of "fun" stuff in its newspaper and on its Web site while still having more than one person at the state capital, while still offering a comprehensive business report every day, etc. But maybe the Trib can succeed following a different path.
I'll leave you with one thought. You can suck down the Tribune Kool Aid and convince yourself that this really is the way to recovery. But one day soon, and it's not that far off, a major change is coming. The paper's best hope right now is for some of its debt holders to renegotiate terms. They might be willing to do that, but they are going to want new management. On that day, Zell and his ilk will be gone. There will be a new owner, a new editor and new rules by which to play. In short, a new flavor of Kool Aid. Enjoy.
#16 Posted by Former Trib Guy, CJR on Sun 12 Jul 2009 at 09:50 AM
I Guess everyone can't Be Like Kutchie's Key West Cafe over in Carolina. So if you
can't have the burger you love. Love the burger you're with. I am with Kutchie's Goody Goody Cheese Burger. The World's Greatest Cheese Burger. Think I'll finish
up with a Big Slice of Kutchie's World's Greatest Key Lime Pie. And like Smoky Sings, "Take A Good Look At My Face", See My Smile Really Looks In Place".
The Tracks of My Beer's.......OH No.....How's Gonna Pay My Tab!!!!!
Jackson Brown
#17 Posted by Jackson Brown, CJR on Wed 9 Dec 2009 at 12:56 AM
Overall though, layers haven't really changed much since I wrote the first version of this book more than three years ago.
#18 Posted by AparySype, CJR on Thu 24 Mar 2011 at 07:47 AM