Farhad Manjoo thinks political cartoons are stale, stupid, and unfunny—or so he argued in Slate last week, saying that, instead of honoring cartoons, the Pulitzer committee should consider including “biting infographics, hilarious image macros, irresistible Tumblrs clever Web comics, and even poignant listicles.”
But political cartoons are neither homogeneous nor passé. They come in every shape and medium and are found all over news sites, blogs, and social media.

There are plenty of great single-panel cartoons, Manjoo’s least favorite, but there is also a lot of excellent animated commentary. Ann Telnaes has been doing strictly animated work for The Washington Post for a number of years now. Two years ago, Mark Fiore won the Pulitzer for his brilliant, self-syndicated animations. And Steve Brodner does amazing hybrid animation-live drawing commentary, which can be found on several online platforms, including the Washington Spectator. Since the launch of Politico, I’ve done animations, as well as a number of interactive political cartoon games.
The people who run websites know that cartoons have broad appeal. That‘s why you find cartoons on the homepages of so many sites, including Slate. (I’m told by Daryl Cagle, who used to draw and edit political cartoons for Slate, that in its early days, political cartoons often accounted for half the site’s traffic.) And The New York Times, for the first time in its history, has a regular political cartoon, Brian Macfadden’s “Big Fat Whale,” which appears in its Sunday Review section.
Cartoons are not infographics. They employ art, humor, metaphors, and, yes, even stupid puns. They engage the reader in ways that literally light up the brain more than plain factual information.
Don’t get me wrong. I like infographics, am a big fan of pie charts and graphs, and really love seeing the memes and macros spreading out there online. But a pie chart or other infographic has never provoked a riot or resulted in a fatwa on its author. Just this year, the Syrian regime went after Ali Ferzat, a Syrian cartoonist, whose drawings mocked President Bashar al-Assad. They were so infuriated by his cartoons they broke his hands trying to shut him up. Cartoons have a special way of getting under the skin.

Cartoonists were creating memes before anyone had a clue what a meme was. They were the original tweeters, long accustomed to boiling a thought down to 140 characters. We’ve been around a long time and, like the rest of journalism, we’re adapting to all the current changes.
That said, we’re happy to share the space with the new kids on the block. Let a thousand listicles and photoshopped memes bloom. Just treat us with a little respect, will ya?
If pulizter's were suddenly given out for listicles, www.cracked.com would soon require a new building to store them.
#1 Posted by Thimbles, CJR on Mon 23 Apr 2012 at 03:33 PM
"Cartoonists were creating memes before anyone had a clue what a meme was."
I collect and study the work of Thomas "Tad" Dorgan, and boy is the above statement true when it comes to his work in the teens and 20s! He was basically a one-man meme machine, popularizing phrases like "cat's pajamas," "drugstore cowboy," "for crying out loud," and even "yes, we have no bananas," all of which are still in use today.
But, yeah, very silly article on Manjoo's part.
#2 Posted by Peteykins, CJR on Mon 23 Apr 2012 at 05:12 PM
Very Ironic that Mr. Manjoo decided to attack Matt Wuerker for not being the ground breaking genus that Matt Wuerker is. Matt Wuerker IS a ground breaking editorial cartoonist as he has not rested with his brush 'n' ink but has pushed his way into animated commentary. Matt Wuerker could've stopped there but the genius that he is sparked him create an interactive political cartoon game.
I don't mean to single out Mr. Manjoo, but since he decided to use Matt Wuerker's work to denounce the skill of drawing as it pertains to political commentary... I strongly suggest Mr. Manjoo continue to 'rarely look at political cartoons'....and just go back to framing his favorite 'poignant listicle' or 'info-graphic' for his office wall.
Politico is very lucky to have Wuerker's commentary on their site.
#3 Posted by Milt Priggee, CJR on Mon 23 Apr 2012 at 05:14 PM
Me, I think poignant listicles work best in editorial cartoons:
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/04/02/1079148/-Health-care-glossary
http://leftycartoons.com/our-top-ten-excuses-for-ignoring-unemployment/
but I'm silly that way.
#4 Posted by Thimbles, CJR on Mon 23 Apr 2012 at 05:47 PM
Manjoo cites the Pepper Spraying Cop meme — which, in its original form, was brilliant, and did make a profound point about police brutality. However, he goes on to say, "But its lasting power was in the hundreds of hilarious follow-ups it spawned."
… well, maybe a few of them were funny and inspired; most, however, quickly degenerated into "blunt, one-dimensional jokes, rarely exhibiting nuance, irony, or subtext" (to use Manjoo's own description of cartoons). Like any successful meme, it was seized on and applied in thousands of lame and unfunny ways, dissipating its impact, and eventually losing any context it might have once had.
#5 Posted by JP Trostle, CJR on Mon 23 Apr 2012 at 06:14 PM
Anyone can have one good idea, even Mr. Manjoo. True creative talent lies in the ability to consistently produce good ideas week after week, month after month, year after year. And don’t forget that creatives like Mr. Wurker are required to produce those ideas on a deadline, not whenever inspiration strikes. Photoshopping one more tired version of the latest meme is easy. Art is hard.
#6 Posted by Mel G, CJR on Thu 26 Apr 2012 at 09:03 AM