The Observer’s Megan McCarthy has already covered this matter, but we’d just like to add that this is a really poor defense for arresting journalists, circulated by Mayor Bloomberg’s Press Secretary, Stu Loeser:
From: “Loeser, Stu”
Date: November 17, 2011 8:02:59 PM EST
Cc: “Loeser, Stu”, “LaVorgna, Marc” , “Wolfson, Howard”
Subject: Just 5 of the “26 arrested reporters” are actually credentialed reporters
To: Interested Parties
From: Stu Loeser
Re: Just 5 of the “26 arrested reporters” are actually credentialed reporters
Date: Thursday, November 17, 2011
Like all of you, I’ve heard and read many reports of reporters who supposedly were wearing valid NYPD press credentials, yet allegedly encountered problems on the streets of New York. Like some of you, I had those stories in mind when I read The Awls’ rundown of “The
2526 Arrested Reporters and What They Do.” (In case you missed it, that piece, that piece is linked here.)
Not being familiar with many of the media outlets for which The Awl says these reporters work, I had the list of “26 arrested reporters” checked against the roster of reporters who hold valid NYPD press passes.
You can imagine my surprise when we found that only five of the 26 arrested reporters actually have valid NYPD-issued press credentials. Note that we didn’t check—and don’t really care for the sake of this exercise—if the reporter’s credential lists the media outlet for which he or she currently works.
One more thing. Of the five reporters with valid press credentials who were arrested, three were arrested for trespassing and had their arrest voided. As the Associated Press and others reported, there’s no doubt that these personnel—and others—were in fact trespassing. There’s no question that protesters sliced open a chain link fence and tried to take over private property.
This report was published by the AP:
“Reporter Karen Matthews and photographer Seth Wenig of The Associated Press in New York were taken into custody along with about eight other people after they followed protesters through an opening in a chain-link fence into a park, according to an AP reporter and other witnesses. Matthew Lysiak of the Daily News of New York was also arrested at the park, according to witnesses and the Daily News.”
Thanks for taking the time to read this.
Stu
McCarthy’s post contains an additional spreadsheet that was distributed in the memo showing which arrested journalists had valid NYPD press credentials.
Not only does Loeser fail to explain why two of the five credentialed reporters were ever arrested in the first place, he ignores the criticism that CJR—and plenty of other organizations—have made all along: possessing an NYPD press credential is a terrible standard for determining who is a journalist, particularly when the NYPD doesn’t have an efficient process in place to issue them.
Fortunately, there are more than a few interested parties currently making this case. The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press has an excellent round-up of them here, which is also accessible at Josh Stearns’s well-curated Storify page. Columbia Journalism School faculty also submitted a letter of concern (PDF here) about journalist arrests at Occupy Wall Street to Mayor Bloomberg and NYPD Commisioner Ray Kelly this afternoon.

In the age of social media, what, pray tell, would be a good standard of determining who is a journalist? Can't anyone with a Twitter or YouTube account or a Tumblr blog be considered a journalist?
#1 Posted by derek, CJR on Fri 18 Nov 2011 at 06:49 PM
You "professional journalists" need a reality check...
You can't trample on crime scenes without risking getting arrested, dudes.
That's just how it is.
Can't stand the heat? Get out of the kitchen!
#2 Posted by padikiller, CJR on Fri 18 Nov 2011 at 10:35 PM
A Press Pass is not a Get Out of Jail Free Card. Any now CJR wants to waive the requirement for getting a Pass altogether?
These guys are advocates, not reporters.
#3 Posted by JLD, CJR on Sat 19 Nov 2011 at 07:43 AM
What makes livestreamer Tim Poole, who has done a remarkable job providing real time coverage of OWS, any different than a so-called "credentialled" reporter from the Times or Daily News? Or someone writing for, say, AlterNet as opposed to Murdoch's Post?
Credentials do not a reporter make and, frankly, many of the journalists who have NYPD "press credentials" haven't done a bang up job of covering OWS.
Once police begin arresting reporters, then we are on a slippery slope that stiffles any coverage the police think will show them in a bad light. And that slope got slipperier last night when, in Los Angeles, journalists agreed to cover only what the cops wanted them to see, even to the point of shutting down aerial coverage from news choppers. Meanwhile, the cops were playing target practice, shooting so-called non-lethal weapons at people who were in trees. Was anyone hurt? We'll never know because the cops didn't allow unimpeded news coverage of their actions.
And shame, shame, shame on the mainstream media in LA for going along with this sham of a sham. When did they forget the lessons taught in Journalism 101, that the police and government do not get to set the terms of news coverage?
As for "padikiller" and "jld," a protest in a public space is not a "crime scene." The only criminals I've seen are the cops.
#4 Posted by Charley James, CJR on Wed 30 Nov 2011 at 02:31 PM
If you're not alarmed by the thought of a police force being the sole authority on who is a "valid" journalist, you're not paying attention. Shades of China? Iran? Venezuela? I thought this was a democracy, and the media was the 4th estate? Hmmm, maybe not (anymore)?
#5 Posted by former journalist, CJR on Fri 2 Dec 2011 at 11:10 AM