What if American law enforcement agents arrested more than six hundred drug dealing suspects in more than twenty cities across the country in just two days and nobody noticed?
On February 24, that’s exactly what happened as raids targeted drug gangs in cities all over the United States. In two days, 676 people were arrested and authorities confiscated $12 million, 282 weapons, ninety-four vehicles, and large packages of drugs.
It was one of the largest operations against drug cartels operating in the United States in recent years. These gangs were allegedly part of the vast structure that moves millions of dollars worth of drugs out of Mexico and into American neighborhoods in hundreds of cities. But did anyone notice?
As the arrests and seizures were reported by the DEA, FBI, and local law enforcement agencies, the front pages in the cities where the operation unfolded were concerned mostly with the latest developments in Libya, thousands of miles away. The arrests made in their cities, of people selling drugs to their residents, did not seem to have the same news value.
For papers like the Los Angeles Times, The Arizona Republic in Phoenix, The Dallas Morning News, the St. Louis Post-Dispatch, the Chicago Tribune, The Denver Post, The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, the Detroit Free Press, or the Newark Star-Ledger, news of the arrests did not make their front pages, even though these cities were part of the operation.
The New York Times ran a small teaser on the front page (their main story is here, as did the Houston Chronicle, where the raid resulted in a shootout and a local cop was wounded. Only a handful of papers, like the San Antonio Express-News,The San Diego Union-Tribune, El Paso Times, and in cities along the Rio Grande Valley gave the story some space on their front pages.
Watching from across the border, this was shocking. Raids against drug cartels and coverage of criminal activities surrounding the drug trade frequently jump to the front pages of Mexican newspapers. We experience the war on drugs every day through the violence employed by the cartels trying to control territories across the country. It has left almost 40,000 people dead in its wake.
But in Mexico, whenever raids or arrests don’t make the front page, the reason is frequently not lack of interest, but an abundance of caution. In the past four years, drug cartels have killed more than ten journalists, kidnapped dozens more, and carried out scores of attacks against newspaper offices or TV stations with gunfire and grenades. The objective: burying coverage of their activities.
I know this because I am a newspaper editor in Mexico, and in the past few years I have learned to take into account more than the news value of a crime story. But as far as I know, no threat exists against the US media—and so, the fact that such a significant raid against local drug gangs didn’t make the front pages of the local newspapers looked kind of strange.
Strange, but not new.. For years the absence of stories about how drugs are moved and traded inside the United States has sparked my curiosity. Ten years ago, while a graduate student at the University of Texas at Austin, I did a content analysis of how several American news outlets portrayed the war on drugs in Mexico and in the United States. I uncovered two main narratives. The one about Mexico focused on government corruption, the cartels’ structure, their control of local law enforcement, and the way they move drugs across the country. The narrative about the US dealt mostly with drug addiction and stories about prevention and rehabilitation programs.

These are good questions. It does appear that mainstream dailies see the drug trade through routine "crime story" eyes rather than as part of an economic and sociological system. I think it's just habit.
It is also difficult to trace these networks, particularly since law enforcement often stops at tracing the drugs, leaving the money trail untraveled.
Several years ago Baltimore City Paper tried to examine the business of drugs in our city, following the money to real estate, car dealerships and non-profit organizations that, in some cases, had ties to local politicians. The trail lead south and west, to Texas, Arizona, California and Mexico.
The series continues ( http://citypaper.com/news/corner-cartel-1.1108703 ) and it is clear that keeping the players straight even in a mid-sized city like Baltimore is more than a full-time job for more people than we employ.
Worth a look, though, for larger news organizations.
#1 Posted by Edward Ericson Jr., CJR on Fri 10 Jun 2011 at 01:40 PM
The War on Drugs failed Billions of dollars ago! This money could have been used for outreach programs to clean up the bad end of drug abuse by providing free HIV testing, free rehab, and clean needles. Harmless drugs like marijuana could be legalized to help boost our damaged economy. Cannabis can provide hemp for countless natural recourses and the tax revenue from sales alone would pull every state in our country out of the red! Vote Teapot, PASS IT, and legalize it. Voice you opinion with the movement and check out my pro-cannabis art at http://dregstudiosart.blogspot.com/2011/01/vote-teapot-2011.html
#2 Posted by Brandt Hardin, CJR on Fri 10 Jun 2011 at 05:06 PM
I think that the immigration debate has some influence over this topic. Many of the mainstream media outlet have a "liberal" slant. I think that if they are pro open borders types, they do not want to shed light on these immigrant communities as import points for the cartels, as that would turn public opinion even more against illegal immigrants.
#3 Posted by challenger, CJR on Mon 13 Jun 2011 at 12:38 AM
Some simple facts:
* A rather large majority of people will always feel the need to use drugs, such as heroin, opium, nicotine, amphetamines, alcohol, sugar, or caffeine.
* Due to Prohibition, the availability of mind-altering drugs has become so universal and unfettered, that in any city of the civilized world, any one of us would be able to procure practically any drug we wish within an hour.
* The massive majority of people who use drugs do so recreationally - getting high at the weekend then up for work on a Monday morning.
* A small minority of people will always experience drug use as problematic.
* Throughout history, the prohibition of any mind-altering substance has always exploded usage rates, overcrowded jails, fueled organized crime, created rampant corruption of law-enforcement, even whole governments, and induced an incalculable amount of suffering and death.
* It's not even possible to keep drugs out of prisons, but prohibitionists wish to waste hundreds of billions of our money in an utterly futile attempt to keep them off our streets.
* Prohibition kills more people and ruins more lives than the prohibited drugs have ever done.
* The United States jails a larger percentage of it's own citizens than any other country in the world, including those run by the worst totalitarian regimes.
* In 'the land formally known as free', all citizens have been stripped of their 4th amendment rights and are now totally subordinate to a corporatized, despotic government with a heavily armed and corrupt, militarized police force whose often deadly intrusions into their homes and lives are condoned by an equally corrupt and spineless judiciary.
* As with torture, prohibition is a grievous crime against humanity. If you support it, or even simply tolerate it by looking the other way while others commit it, you are an accessory to a very serious moral transgression against humanity.
* America re-legalized certain drug use in 1933. The drug was alcohol, and the 21st amendment re-legalized its production, distribution and sale. Both alcohol consumption and violent crime dropped immediately as a result, and, very soon after, the American economy climbed out of that same prohibition engendered abyss into which it had previously been pushed.
#4 Posted by malcolm kyle, CJR on Mon 13 Jun 2011 at 08:00 AM
Totally endorsing Kyle here, and furthermore
--Wait, what? Sugar is a drug? And prohibition caused the Great Depression?
#5 Posted by Edward Ericson Jr., CJR on Mon 13 Jun 2011 at 03:49 PM
Chalk it up to the fact that the drug trade in America is predominately seen from the recreational user's point of view. People like sausage, but don't want to now how it's made.
#6 Posted by Ronald, CJR on Tue 14 Jun 2011 at 11:33 AM
I think it's pretty simple: US newspapers are just giving people what they want.
People don't like hearing about how their country is riddled with drug dealers. They're interested in the story, just they don't want the drug trading to be going on near their cities (almost like NIMBY-ism). So the media give people what they want.
#7 Posted by Kevin C., CJR on Fri 17 Jun 2011 at 12:17 AM