It is birthday week for the Affordable Care Act, the official name of the health reform law passed a year ago. Previous CJR town halls have suggested that ordinary people, millions of whom are supposed to be helped by the Act, know little or nothing about it. But what about young adults who will benefit from one of the Act’s best provisions—-being able to stay on their parents’ insurance until age twenty-six? Of any group, it’s students who arguably should know the most. So in honor of the Act’s first birthday I ambled down to the campus of New York University to chat with students hanging around in cafes, sitting on benches, and studying in buildings. Almost every one I approached answered apologetically that he or she knew nothing about the law. Some students had come from families of doctors. But their knowledge of the law differed little from those who didn’t.
Sarah Humphrey, age twenty, was standing outside a building where she takes drama classes. She’s majoring in musical theater; jobs being what they are for aspiring actresses, she knew getting health insurance could be a problem someday. “I know it (the law) makes health care more accessible,” Humphrey told me. “Considering I’m in the arts, it will make it more accessible for me.” She didn’t know how. As we talked more, she mentioned a couple other things about the law. Her parents were medical researchers for a drug company in New Jersey, and “they think they are going to be paid less but they don’t mind,” Humphrey said. “I was under the impression health care will cost less marginally because doctors will be paid less. I acknowledge that may be wrong because I live in a bit of a bubble.”
I asked when she would be off her parents’ insurance policy. “As soon as I’m out of the house, which is probably pretty soon,” she said. Did she know that she could stay on the policy until she turns twenty-six—six years from now? “I never heard of that. That’s very useful,” she said, and thanked me for telling her. Humphrey said she got most of her information from her peers and from the Internet. “How blessed we are to have Google,” she said. “If I had to go to the library I would know nothing.”
Twenty-one-year-old Dhara Patel from Yonkers will graduate in May with a degree in psychology. Her goal is to attend medical school in a year, but in the meantime she has applied for a teaching fellowship while she goes through the application process. “I don’t really know much,” she said. “I’m not up-to-date on the health care issues. I’m just too busy with school.” She did know that the law would affect her “greatly”, she told me. “I have the main idea,” she explained. “It’s very expensive, and the service isn’t fair for the amount of money we’re paying.” She was particularly upset with NYU’s student health plan. She pays a $25 copayment to see a dermatologist who is treating her, and has spent $1000 out-of-pocket for medication, pointing out that the student plan had a yearly cap on medication. “For the last two refills I had to pay out of pocket,” she said. “I paid $900 for the medication.”
Patel said she was no longer on her parents’ health insurance policy “because I’m over twenty and my parents’ policies don’t cover kids over nineteen.” Her mother just got laid off from a bank job, but her father, a computer technician, still has coverage. She, too, knew nothing about staying longer on her dad’s insurance. “I don’t think my dad knows,” she said.
Well, yeah, journalism has been awful. But I don't think you ought to let these dumbass ignoramuses off the hook. I mean, these are prospective professionals at NYU, a premier American university as you pointed out, and can't/won't read "big words" in a decent newspaper? These people have had all the very, very best of schooling, both public and private, and they are too stupid and too lazy to read the damned newspaper. Sheesh.
I'm willing to bet if you go over to my local community college, where low income students get their first two years of college credits, coming from arguably one of the worst school districts in the nations -- LAUSD -- they'd know more about ACA and their own health care coverage than these vapid goofballs.
#1 Posted by James, CJR on Thu 24 Mar 2011 at 01:47 PM
Government mandated coverage is a "best" provision of the new law?
No telling where you stand on this contentious issue, is there, Trudy?
You need to be working on Capitol Hill instead of for a "neutral" watchdog publication...
The reason these kids don't understand Obamacare isn't because the propagandists haven't tried hard enough...... It's because these kids are normal, healthy kids.. They're not supposed to give a crap about health insurance.
For most of them, their mommies and daddies are going to make sure they're covered no matter what.. The bulk of them don't give a crap because in general THEY DON"T NEED HEALTH INSURANCE.
It isn't a priority for a 20 year old health kid who has no assets to lose.
Getting laid?... Definitely a priority.. Getting married.. Probably... Getting a job? Sure..
Worrying about the deductible on a mammogram?
No way.
#2 Posted by padikiller, CJR on Fri 25 Mar 2011 at 11:54 AM
You haven't failed the public, it's the American public that's failed in its civic responsibilities. As you note, the Brazilian guy knew about the health law, and he'd gotten his information from US media. US media is inferior to, say, British, but the basic facts are usually there for those willing to look.
The failure is American education, that creates a culture of cluelessness. What you're seeing is no different from Jay Leno's walkabouts, or the Canadian comedy interview segment "what Americans think". I remember Leno interviewing the Stanford football team. They couldn't name, among other things, the country on America's nothern border.
According to Natl Geographic surveys, only 13% of Americans could locate Iraq on a map of the Middle East in 2003, when 79% of Americans were baying to invade the place.
Given that the problem can only be fixed in school and from a young age, it would take at least 50 years to get to a truly educated populace. That's if Americans started now. But they seem more interested in taking money from teachers to give tax cuts to millionaires.
#3 Posted by Kevin Robb, CJR on Fri 25 Mar 2011 at 04:31 PM