The past year’s health discussion has been remarkable for the narrow range of ideas and opinions that have floated down to the man on the street. Journalists have sought out the same organizations and sources for their stories, offering up what has become the conventional wisdom for reform. To bring more voices into the conversation, our series, Excluded Voices, will intermittently feature health care experts who aren’t on the media’s A-list of sources. (The entire series is archived here.) We want to offer journalists more options for their stories and encourage a deeper conversation. To that end, we’ve asked the experts featured in each post to respond to questions from Campaign Desk readers.
Too hot to touch during the campaign, too complicated to explain in space-limited news stories, Medicare has long been a verboten subject among the pols and press. When budget director Peter Orszag told The Washington Post that “Health care reform is entitlement reform,” Medicare suddenly got a bit more respect—but only in the context of stories about Medicare Advantage plans, those controversial policies whose sellers receive excess payments from the government.
Yet there are many stories that touch the more than forty million Americans now on Medicare, and the millions more who will join the program in the next few years. Increasing medical costs threaten the program’s long-range solvency, and seniors themselves are being asked to bear more of their health care expenses. In its annual survey of retiree costs, Fidelity Investments found that medical costs for this group have risen 50 percent in the past seven years. Medicare now pays for just a little more than half of the medical expenses for beneficiaries.
Campaign Desk talked to Medicare expert Marilyn Moon, vice president of the American Institutes for Research, and a former trustee of the Medicare system, to help journalists and the public understand the short-term and long-term issues facing the program—and some of the proposed fixes.
Trudy Lieberman: What’s the biggest problem facing Medicare?
Marilyn Moon: It’s the misconception that Medicare is too generous for its beneficiaries. People who say Medicare is not sustainable and must be part of entitlement reform implicitly accept the argument that there is excess coverage there. It means that anyone who wants to talk about improving Medicare is instantly on the defensive.
TL: What is the biggest risk faced by people now on Medicare?
MM: The gaps in Medicare’s benefit package mean that anyone who can afford to will seek supplemental coverage. That coverage is expensive and often not a very good deal. When people buy what’s called “Medigap” insurance, on average they may be getting back only seventy-five cents worth of health care for every dollar they spend. Administrative costs are also high. But going without such coverage is risky since the basic Medicare package has no catastrophic protection for those with very high expenses.
TL: What is the biggest risk faced by people who will be on the program in the next several years?
MM: In addition to the high costs of supplemental coverage for those who must buy it on their own, more employers have stopped providing the retiree insurance that is now available to about one-third of all Medicare beneficiaries. Also, the costs of health care continue to grow faster than retiree incomes. This affects the costs of Medicare and puts extra burdens on people who must pay more for their Medicare benefits and supplemental coverage.
TL: How much do individual beneficiaries typically spend out of pocket?
MM: The average is about $3,000 a year, but it can be much higher.
TL: What improvements would help?
MM: I’d give beneficiaries protection against huge out-of-pocket costs which keep increasing. If Medicare is an insurance plan, then it must cap the amount that people spend on their own, just as there is a limit on out-of-pocket spending offered by most good commercial insurance policies.
TL: Medicare is so complicated. How should it be simplified?
I went on Medicare in March after 30 yrs as a self-employed person scratching up insurance. If this admin gets "universal health care" or makes changes, will I still have Medicare or will I be in the same boat as everyone else--trying to find insurance and pay for it?
#1 Posted by Star, CJR on Thu 9 Apr 2009 at 11:00 AM
Among gamers of the system, suppliers of home medical equipment (special beds and the like) need to cited.
In my own experience, taking care of an ill parent living with me, vendors would charge and be reimbursed by Medicare for items at a rate 4 and 5 times the cost they would charge me if I bought the item in person for cash.
I wonder what the annual costs to Medicare are for vendors. There needs to be a realistic "fair and customary" price index for them, as there is for physicians' fees.
#2 Posted by Jane, CJR on Thu 9 Apr 2009 at 06:05 PM
Two industries which do not have a shortfall, and in fact are thriving on the very conditions that are sapping Medicare's trust funds, are this country's health insurance and pharmaceutical industries.
If the "rising costs of healthcare," are the source of our problems, especially in this downward economy, these industries are far and away the primary cause. It is futile to look for solutions to Medicare without regulating these industries.
The health insurance industry currently occupies an Entitled position in our economy. True entitlement reform would be Health Insurance industry Reform.
#3 Posted by Jane, CJR on Thu 9 Apr 2009 at 06:30 PM
In response to Star: I do not believe there will be many changes to the Medicare program that should cause you concern. It will likely stay pretty much as is, but hopefully with some modest improvements in the benefits offered.
#4 Posted by Marilyn Moon, CJR on Fri 10 Apr 2009 at 11:14 AM