This is the eighth in a series of posts that discuss how possible changes in Social Security will affect the residents of Champaign-Urbana, Illinois. The entire series is archived here.
Throughout this year’s debate on Social Security, there has been almost no mention of the other parts of the program—survivors’ and disability benefits. The purpose of Social Security was to protect people not only from loss of income due to old age, but also loss of income when the breadwinner died or when a worker became disabled. However, a New York Times op-ed last week by former Obama budget director Peter Orszag fired the opening shot in what could become a battle to privatize Social Security’s disability program.
Fifty-three year old Jim Dobbs knows a lot about that part of Social Security. He became disabled, and the $1330 a month he receives in Social Security disability benefits makes it possible to keep his family going. Until he qualified for benefits—not easy to do—things were really rough financially, and at one point Dobbs considered suicide. He said his family, including two kids, survived entirely on help from family and friends. He also had to cash out his retirement savings—people on disability must often do that, which leaves them with little cushion in retirement. His wife teaches voice lessons and brings in about $800 a month, but her business has suffered during the recession.
Dobbs’s journey from making a decent living as a salesman to living on disability benefits was a long one, but it’s typical of what people face when a serious illness strikes. A twenty-year-old worker today has a three in ten chance of becoming disabled. Eight or nine years ago, Dobbs told me, he was making around $70,000 a year selling computers and digital video systems. He also spent several years selling insurance and annuities, a job he said he hated. Before he qualified for the disability benefit, he was selling grand pianos. Music is his hobby. But commissions from selling grand pianos were also dwindling as the recession engulfed residents of Champaign-Urbana. When Dobbs left that job, two-thirds of his monthly take-home pay went to pay his health insurance—$680 a month.
“I really liked the piano job better than any other job in the last few years,” he told me. “But my health was so bad, I couldn’t do it anymore. I stopped working in June of last year. I was one of the top salesmen, but they wanted me out because I was falling asleep.” He also said he would fall asleep on the phone, at the computer, behind the wheel of his ’93 Buick, whose primary color he describes as rust. “I would just go to sleep.”
Dobbs suffers from severe sleep apnea, and explained that the treatment he’s had has been ineffective. “If I had had effective treatment ten years ago, I would be in a different place. I had a lousy doctor. Sleep apnea is the central villain,” he explained. Dobbs had a heart attack ten years ago, and says that his other ailments—diabetes, depression, COPD—are related to the sleep disorder. As a result, he is in and out of the hospital, and had just been discharged the day before we chatted. “A lot of my problems have been stress-related for trying to live on nothing,” he said.
He has Medicaid to pay for his health needs and gets $650 a month in food stamps, which helps the family buy food. For now, the family is stable, even if his health is not.
Some nine million Americans now get Social Security disability benefits. The number of applications is rising now, reaching more than 750,000 each quarter, an increase of over fifty percent from four years ago. It takes three years to determine eligibility. More than 60 percent of applicants fail to qualify on the first review. For those who ask for a reconsideration—the first level of appeal—the denial rate is about 80 percent. Dobbs was lucky. He had good documentation for his ailments and help in navigating the cumbersome process.
- 1
- 2
I THINK THE HOUE SUCK NEXT ? WILL IRA WORK AND FOR HOW LONG JUST DONT GET SICK DONT RAISE THE RENTS LIKE ALL RETIRIEDMENT FUNS LEAVE ALL THE OLD PEOPLE OUT IN THE STREET OR HOPE THEY DIE OFF AND GET OUT OF THERE WAY REFORM THE SPACE PROGRAM PEOPLE ARE MORE IMPORTANT ONLY THE VEREY RICH WILL BE ABLE TO LIVE IN THE USA PEOPLE WORKING TWO JOBS JUST TO PAY THE RENT THIS IS THE SATAN LIE 666 IS COMING THEY DO THIS AT CHRISTAMS TIME SO PEOPLE WONT KNOW WATHS GOING ON THE NEW WORLD ORDER IS SANTAN 666 ORDER THE GOD WILL PUNISH THE USA FOR THIS HITLER SIN FEAM DEATH CAMPS THEY PLAND TO PUT US IN what about this stinking world satan wants to see all those people die like the jews
#1 Posted by patty, CJR on Thu 16 Dec 2010 at 04:39 AM
Time To “MAN UP”
When two party agreements are entered into, the agreement’s success hinges on both parties living up to their end of the bargain. Today we’re having the wrong conversation regarding Social Security. President Reagan signed SS reform legislation in 1983 that created an agreement between the people and their government. At the official signing of the agreement, the President said, Social Security is “fixed for the next 75 years” - Remember? As per that agreement millions of average hard working Americans began overpaying their SS taxes by billions of dollars annually so another SS crisis conversation in 2011 wouldn’t be necessary - Remember?
More than likely you're one of those hard working Americans who’ve generated 12.4 cents for the SS trust fund for every dollar you’ve earned. Remember the financial sacrifices this agreement caused you and your family to make? In spite of significant financial sacrifices and pain, you kept your end of the bargain - Remember? Now politicians are suggesting those same hard working Americans should sacrifice again by raising the SS retirement age, and adjusting future SS benefits. Wouldn’t you agree the other party to this agreement should start doing a little sacrificing by living up to their end of the bargain? The other party benefitted when 2.54 trillion dollars of potential SS trust fund retirement dollar assets were transferred from the SS trust fund to the general revenue fund, leaving behind 2.54 trillion in new debt. Politicians have used the people’s sacrificial retirement dollars to subsidize corporate and income tax rates, fund tax cuts, pay for wars, and mask the true size of annual federal budget deficits among other things. If a deal really is a deal, then the other party to this deal should “MAN UP” by living up to their end of the bargain.
This Social Security dialogue is not one working Americans can afford to ignore, this conversation must begin anew. The talking points must be fair and balanced and to the point, and the point is; working Americans have kept their end of the deal, now keep your end, and until you do, don’t ask us to sacrifice again. It’s time for those who’ve ridden the backs of average working Americans to their prosperity to “MAN UP” and fulfill their obligations. The “MAN UP” plan: http://www.slideboom.com/presentations/265156/Man-Up
#2 Posted by Pappyg, CJR on Thu 16 Dec 2010 at 05:15 PM