There are apparently 15,000 journalists attending the Democratic National Convention. Here is what some of them are doing:
14,000 are wearing terrible suits.
7,500 aren’t doing much at all. This isn’t surprising. Only a small number of reporters actually have a reason to be here. The rest are conventioneering—seeing old friends, eating Democratic-themed menu items (“Barack Obama’s Turkey Chili”) in pandering local restaurants, brandishing their press passes at all comers, looking for free things, and spending about 14 percent of their time trying to rustle up enough stories to justify their presence to their editors. These reporters are the ones mostly writing about themselves, or their friends, or their experiences exploring Denver with their friends (“I was enjoying some turkey chili with David Broder yesterday…”). At least they’re open about the fact that they’re enjoying themselves.
4,021 are smugly bad-mouthing the convention and its participants in their story ledes (“There is no reason for so many journalists to be here”). Oh, you truth-telling rebels! These dismissals invariably ring false. If they really didn’t want to be here, they wouldn’t have come.
2,294 are bitching about only having perimeter press passes. The press corps is divided into four levels of access—perimeter, arena, hall, and floor. Arena, hall, and floor passes are allowed to enter the Pepsi Center. Those with perimeter passes are restricted to the parking lot. Some of these are mournfully wandering around like Diogenes, looking for stories, or perhaps discarded arena and hall passes, but only finding sunburn. Others have tried to sneak into the Pepsi Center, only to be rebuffed by the robustly efficient Young Dem Robot security staffers. The rest are crammed into four or five huge white tents scattered across the parking lot. The tents house the remote operations of most of the news operations. In Pavilion Four, there is free Coors and free Swedish meatballs and a kiosk where media members can have campaign buttons made featuring their own names. There are also several comfortable leather chairs and flat screen televisions. During Hillary Clinton’s speech, several women clap when Clinton thanks the “sisterhood of the traveling pantsuits.” One of these women is wearing a button that reads “Vote Jeanne President.”
1,026 are drunk. This is as it should be.
500 don’t have credentials, but are trying desperately to get them. The credentialing process occurs in a Hampton Inn about a forty-minute walk from the Pepsi Center. Each morning, reporters have to come and claim their credentials for that particular day. The media members are separated by medium—newspaper reporters on one floor, magazine reporters on another, multimedia reporters on another. CJR’s credentials are issued from the leftovers pile (third floor). It’s Denver’s answer to the Island of Misfit Toys—bloggers, activists, eighteen-year-olds, men wearing giveaway T-shirts, men complaining about having to pay eleven dollars for parking. One intrepid credentialee is so devoted to his job that he is videotaping the room, like a tourist. A DemBot hustles over and stops him. “There is a lot of sensitive material in this room,” he says. There is most definitely not.
340 are confused about how to find the proper press office inside the Pepsi Center. There are different press rooms with euphonic names like Radio Row, and Talk Show Row. Many of the broadcast journalists are stationed on the uppermost floor of the arena, in what is probably the press box during regular operation. Unaffiliated journalists are stashed on a Being John Malkovich-style semi-floor in the building’s mysterious middle. The unaffiliated press center is a large oblong room featuring several large, oblong tables, no wireless access, and dozens of reporters for small and desperate outlets. Everybody here looks vaguely depressed, or aggravated, possibly because the room was so difficult to find. One indignant woman, in a pink blazer, is desperately trying to find somewhere to have a cigarette. “They told me I had to go downstairs to have a smoke,” she said, shaking her head violently, as if she is about to abandon all caution and light up in the press elevator. She steps out onto the unaffiliated level. “Can I have a smoke here?” she asks. She cannot. The Blogger Lounge is appended to the unaffiliated press room. Its “lounge” credentials apparently hinge on the fact that it has sofas.
150 are in the CNN Grill. At the 2004 RNC in New York, CNN took over the Tick Tock Diner on 34th and 8th and offered round-the-clock free food and beverages to CNN staffers, their guests, and their hangers-on. In Denver, they have outdone themselves, assuming control of a giant brick building in front of the Pepsi Center, painting CNN-friendly slogans on its face (CNN=POLITICS, in a font face that brooks no dissent) and hanging a large electric star that reads CNN Grill. The Grill is ostensibly restricted to CNN staffers and talk show guests, and security is tight, although at times during the afternoon the Grill sets up an ice cream cart behind a fence and distributes free ice cream to all. 200 yards away, Fox News has commandeered another building, and it is much easier to get inside that one.
Sixty-two are enjoying massages.
Seven of them are having their photographs taken with Captain Morgan, the rum-loving pirate who, for some reason, was credentialed into the convention. Captain Morgan wears a red frock coat and a frilly shirt and sounds like he was once told in a high school acting class to project his voice from his diaphragm.
One of them is frantically trying to engineer a meeting between Captain Morgan and Ted Sorenson, the painfully dignified Democratic legend who is finishing an interview with Tavis Smiley just as Captain Morgan bursts into the tent, T-shirts and Morganettes in tow. That person is me, and, in this, I am a failure. But, then again, we are all sort of failures here.



The problem with such tiring criticism of the national political conventions is that it comes from critics who simply don't understand what really happens there every four years. The conventions are about a lot more than just nominating a president, selecting a vice president and adopting a platform to get them elected. National political conventions are about change. The real lasting changes take place off the convention floor, out of the camera lens' range, in each state caucus, rump session and hospitality suite. Tomorrow's leaders grab the reins, yesterday's fade into history. Ideas are exchanged between state and local government officials who learn proven new ways to solve their problems. New courses are charted at the state, county and city levels. That's what most of the reporters assigned to cover these gatherings of the nation's political leaders and volunteers are doing in Denver and will be doing in Minneapolis-St. Paul. Too bad the talking heads don't understand that.
Posted by Warren Wheat on Wed 27 Aug 2008 at 04:19 PM
Thanks for this story. I was wondering what they were doing.
Posted by MsAnna on Wed 27 Aug 2008 at 05:45 PM
Fine, if that's what the 15 thousand journalists are doing in Denver. But where can I read about this exchange of ideas among tomorrow's leaders, the discussions on new solutions to old problems, the charting of new courses, all that meaty talk among the different layers of officials? All I'm seeing is a weird Clinton drama and bunch of garbage copy. For instance, the big news right now: Clinton releases her delegates! Gosh, that’s a real shocker! Or how about this one: Will Bill show up for Obama's speech? Oh, I can hardly wait! Then there is the 11 year old blogger at the convention. Now, that's getting into real substance.
Are we talking about the same convention?
Posted by Stewart Nusbaumer on Wed 27 Aug 2008 at 05:54 PM
Mr. Wheat, please save your sloganeering about 'change' for more gullible saps. If there were any real 'change' taking place at political conventions then the national policy would reflect this. Since the national policies of conquering new colonies to spread global socialism, expanding the powers of the state and further cementing the enslavement of the general public have not changed in the slightest since the last round of political conventions 4 years ago, one can easily conclude you are for the promotion of falsehoods rather than of facts.
Posted by A. Magnus on Wed 27 Aug 2008 at 06:00 PM
HAHAHA very funny. I love it, especially the part about the man videotaping an empty room.
Posted by Brenda Hartsfield on Wed 27 Aug 2008 at 06:19 PM
Touche A. Magnus. Touche.
Posted by f8te on Wed 27 Aug 2008 at 07:37 PM
I had credentials, but when I read there'd be 15,000 journalists there, I decided not to go.
Posted by Charles Raymond on Wed 27 Aug 2008 at 08:12 PM
And here's a pic of the Captain: http://www.flickr.com/photos/leh/2801453963/
Best coverage I've read so far, Justin. Pink Blazer might be my favorite.
Posted by Kristen Taylor on Wed 27 Aug 2008 at 09:50 PM
Fantastic story. Great idea, and well-executed, too. I couldn't believe it when I saw on CNN's "fact crawl" the other day that there were 4,000 delegates in attendance and 15,000 members of the media. That's like a 4 to 1 press to story ratio. Crazy.
Posted by Hunter Slaton on Thu 28 Aug 2008 at 09:18 AM
Nice piece of writing. Very fun.
Posted by Myron Pitts on Thu 28 Aug 2008 at 12:51 PM
Awesome. Just awesome. I don't know who you are --- but I think I would like you...and if a certain former Colorado resident (whose canonized ashes probably still add to the delightful smog of Denver) were still around, I bet he would like you too. Great style. Don't change.
Posted by Jenn on Thu 28 Aug 2008 at 12:59 PM
My feelings about the 15,000:
F the 15,000.
Posted by T.G. on Thu 28 Aug 2008 at 12:59 PM
Great article - I'm glad someone took at look at the convention from this point of view! Basically confirmed my opinion that the conventions, while necessary, have essentially become a circus which people watch (and press attend) for entertainment rather than to gain a better understanding either of the candidate or the issues. But then again, isn't that (unfortunately) what we do most of the time anyway?
Posted by Leif on Thu 28 Aug 2008 at 01:14 PM
Anybody wearing a Mike Royko's fan badge? Great job!
Posted by Andrea on Thu 28 Aug 2008 at 01:37 PM
Great article!! I'm so glad to know what's really going on in Denver now. These guys are literally tripping over each other.
Posted by Jeff on Thu 28 Aug 2008 at 01:56 PM
We journalists never seem to really change! The pack mentality remains.
All you have to do is check CJR's files and a cover story in 1979 or 80 was my master's thesis on the lack of coverage of the economy during the presidential campaign. Here's my little blog rant on the topic.
http://blogs.trb.com/business/columnists/brackey/blog/2008/08/_did_you_hear_that.html
Posted by Harriet Johnson Brackey on Thu 28 Aug 2008 at 02:10 PM
What strikes me most about this is how obscene it is in an era in which newspapers are laying people off by the hundreds that media organizations still have the institutional egotism to have to send folks to a pointless propaganda event at which there is little or no news (example: The Maryland Gazette community paper has a reporter there -- why?). This failure to see real priorities is the reason why the business is in the toilet.
Posted by Clarkycat on Thu 28 Aug 2008 at 02:40 PM
It's "story leads" not "story ledes."
You guys are no better than the reporters you ate critcizing.
Posted by Grumpyb4coffee on Fri 29 Aug 2008 at 08:27 AM
Grumpy,
It's just soooo classic that you wrote "ate criticizing" while criticizing his "ledes" gaffe. Just beautiful....
Oh, and by the way look up "ledes" you doofus:
Ledes:
: the introductory section of a news story that is intended to entice the reader to read the full story
JCL
Posted by JCL on Fri 29 Aug 2008 at 08:42 AM
That was a funny story!
(It's story ledes.)
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/ledes
Posted by Bill B. on Fri 29 Aug 2008 at 08:48 AM
And countless other hacks are writing tired criticism like this.
Posted by Amanda on Fri 29 Aug 2008 at 12:50 PM
Funny and true.
Posted by Lefty on Fri 29 Aug 2008 at 01:11 PM
As a journalist covering this event you couldn't be more on the money. Except for one thing: Anyone with a perimeter pass who couldn't figure out how to get inside didn't deserve to. For us Colorado locals, it's called the ski pass pass back. Three people, two with the ticket to get it, you do the math. Not that we would have ever done such a thing.
Posted by colowriter on Fri 29 Aug 2008 at 01:22 PM
14,999 acutally, one got arrested for not following police orders and then ABC has to try and defend the dude with what news agencies normally do, try to vilify the police.
too funny.
Posted by Anharan on Fri 29 Aug 2008 at 01:39 PM
Couldn't help laughing my ass off. I'm a journalist, and this wastage of time, energy and, often enough, intent is what goes into the landfill that comprises so much of campaign reporting these days.
Thanks for a droll take on campaign chasing.
Posted by Ronin Mansolaris on Fri 29 Aug 2008 at 04:08 PM
Truer words were never written.
"1,026 are drunk. This is as it should be."
Amen, brother, amen.
Posted by Frank the Second on Fri 29 Aug 2008 at 05:01 PM
Mr. Peters,
Wait until the Super Bowl, you will see the sports guys doing the same things, and pissing and moaning along those same lines. The media has gotten to be some fat, entitled bastards.
Posted by Darren M. on Fri 29 Aug 2008 at 06:52 PM
It will truely be interesting to see if 15000 reporters show up at the RNC. My bet is on half that number. I wonder why. hehehehehe
Posted by Larry K on Sat 30 Aug 2008 at 10:15 AM
I wish some of them were actually being journalists. Have none of them been taught the function and responsibility of a free press?
Posted by presto on Sun 31 Aug 2008 at 01:54 AM
Larry K
Half that number?
That's being seriously generous. If the RNC has more journalist than delegates it will only be because of the free food.
Posted by SteveF on Sun 31 Aug 2008 at 11:55 AM
Too bad we couldn't put a firearm in thier hands and have them do a surge in Afganistan where they could do some bloody good for a change.
Posted by Jeff on Sun 31 Aug 2008 at 07:36 PM