
Back in May 2007, Brian Boyer was just another computer guy short-circuiting from ennui sitting on a friend’s couch, reading blogs. Then he noticed a post on BoingBoing about Northwestern University’s Medill School, which had just announced big scholarships specifically for computer programmers interested in a master’s degree in journalism.
As any good techie would, Boyer Googled “journalism” to learn more about the practice and beliefs of the profession that was courting people just like him.
He was invigorated by what he found: ennobling definitions that described journalism as a way to inform people and help them better self-govern. By January 2008, he was an inaugural member of the program, which was funded by a Knight News Challenge grant and designed to train people who write code to write ledes. The idea: to re-boot the industry’s online presence, which has suffered from lack of talent (and imagination) in producing user-friendly databases and interactive news applications. As Boyer says: “Journalism needs more nerds.”
Since mid-2009, thirty-three-year-old Boyer has been the news application editor at the Chicago Tribune, where he leads a team of five tasked with helping the paper achieve new levels of computer-assisted reporting and reader interactivity. It’s a couch-to-newsroom story of growing frequency in the digital news world.
Boyer has anointed his kind “hacker-journalists,” “hacker” being akin to an ace among programmers. They’re guided by a do-gooder mentality and an open-source ethos—believing that information, from programming code to government documents, should be free to all. Like-minded groups dot the country and there are frequent meetups of journos and techies. Some, called “hackathons,” include competitions, such as last year’s challenge to report out and then code apps to help New Yorkers get critical urban info (like the best time to catch a cab), while building community spirit.
One such group, called Hacks/Hackers, was co-founded by Boyer’s mentor at Medill, professor of digital innovation Rich Gordon. Gordon tried for years to turn journalists into programmers before reversing his idea and dreaming up the scholarship that pulled in Boyer, and, to date, eight others. “I think it’s been extremely successful,” he says of the marriage of computer science and journalism. Elsewhere, for instance, Columbia University began offering a joint master’s in journalism and computer science this year. “It’s not a radical concept anymore.”
So far, Boyer’s team has built online programs to help families find the headstones of loved ones after cemetery caretakers double-sold plots, as well as an application to help parents compare schools. During a Tribune investigation into the problems created by a state policy of housing non-senior felons in nursing homes, Boyer saw reporters struggling to read thousands of government documents—they were considering narrowing the scope from statewide to just the Chicago area. So Boyer wrote a program that downloaded the documents from the web, exported the text, and searched for key words. In a few hours, he searched 44,000 documents and presented the investigative team with the 3,600 relevant to their research. His team then built an unprecedented database for the Tribune website that allows readers to search for any nursing home in the state to see its record of reported crimes, violations, and the number of resident sex offenders and felons.
Boyer calls it the most important work of his career, which before journalism was mostly programming to help marketing teams and law firms buried in paperwork. “I feel like the only way we should be judging stuff is by impact,” Boyer says. “Is this work making the world a better place?” So far, so good. The investigation spurred sweeping reform to reduce nursing home violence, signed into law by Governor Pat Quinn in July. Among other things, it mandates that state government create its own version of the database. On his blog, Boyer crowed, “Better software is about to become Illinois law.” It’s what can happen when a self-described nerd and a crusading journalist collide.

Is there anyone in those groups or like them that can find out who/what is blocking e-mail magazines and "blogs" by groups from EU--esp. Germany and Austria?
I am supposed to receive Eurozine newsletter and Eurozine monthly but they have never come. I can pull up the article of the week or day via internet but it's supposed to "just arrive" and it's not. Eurotopics is another "large" group that's supposed to show on my computer regularly and they don't. they do mention that Yahoo.com addresses are usually blocked. But my address is not nor is my server yet I still don't receive them. A newspaper from Germany called WD-World also has verified my account but it has never arrived.
I mentioned this blocking to London Review of Books and they have gotten mine through bimonthly as it is supposed to. Appreciate the help--as I am sure others would also.
#1 Posted by trish, CJR on Wed 30 Mar 2011 at 05:06 PM
>> “hacker” being akin to an ace among programmers.
That's correct.
>> They’re guided by a do-gooder mentality
That's incorrect.
Basically I think the public looks at hackers in a few basic ways (From the most negative image to the most positive):
1) "Hackers are bad/evil".
This group is made up of people who stand to lose (as opposed to profit) from open source stuff or who fail miserably to understand the benefit of it. A lot of the media is in this group. If The Wall Street Journal runs an article on hackers - you can be pretty sure it's a screed on how a group of hackers is trying to destroy something. Your uncle Bill who doesn't know what a browser is: "Isn't it windows?" is likely part of this group. I mean, he reads the WSJ and doesn't know any better.
2) "Hackers are really talented at programming and often involved in crime."
Unfortunately I think a lot of the public believes this.
3) "Hackers are really talented at programming. A tiny percent of them are up to no good."
I think people that live in a tech savvy place like San Francisco look at hackers this way. Some of them might even be (virtuous) hackers themselves , but they know hacking can be used for bad ends.
4) "Hackers always do good things."
This group is made up of idealistic or naive people.
---
My personal viewpoint is number three. Because any highly skilled group of people that are the best of the best at their job - doctors, lawyers, accountants, whatever - will be involved in criminal activity. And I think open source is fantastic.
Strongly held predijice about hackers will surface with regard to the New York Times paywall. Right now it can be defeated with a few lines of simple jsvascript or even CSS.
"new york times" paywall css & defeat & css | js | javascript
http://www.google.com/search?q=%22new%20york%20times%22%20paywall%20css%20%26%20defeat%20%26%20css%20%7C%20js%20%7C%20javascript
Obviously the WSJ will rant. They will claim that anything (Even those tiny code snipets that work purely on the client side.) to be akin to a cyber attack on the very heart of capitalism itself.
As far as I know - the NYT is fully aware (and not troubled) by that code. I won't venture a guess as to why. Maybe somebody at CJR will do an article on it.
#2 Posted by F. Murray Rumpelstiltskin, CJR on Wed 30 Mar 2011 at 11:24 PM
@F. Murray Rumpelstiltskin
The author was describing "“hacker-journalists" not "hackers" with the description that you took issue with.
"Boyer has anointed his kind “hacker-journalists,”... guided by a do-gooder mentality and an open-source ethos—believing that information, from programming code to government documents, should be free to all."
The author is not saying that these values are held by "hackers."
#3 Posted by Kathy Gill, CJR on Wed 22 Jun 2011 at 06:44 PM