Bloggers rightly criticize the press for focusing on the trivial at the expense of the meaningful, process at the expense of the issues, and for not asking tough questions when given the chance to question the president of the United States.
So liberal bloggers had a chance to show us their stuff in a sitdown/quasi press conference yesterday with Obama. They didn’t exactly cover themselves with glory. Here’s the first question:
Thanks for having us here, Mr. President. Just to start off, because the news of the day is obviously what just happened in Kentucky. What’s your feelings on the thought of a Rand Paul supporter actually stepping on the neck of a female MoveOn supporter?
Hey, Mr. President. You’ve got 18 percent unemployment and underemployment, two wars going on, etc. What do you think about a dude in Kentucky stepping on a liberal? Get outta here.
This one isn’t exactly a fastball, either:
Along those lines, Mr. President, on the economy, we do have 9.6 unemployment; economic projections aren’t looking very positive from anybody, with the ongoing foreclosure crisis, as you suggested. Can we expect further initiatives coming out of the administration and maybe Congress post-election?
This one’s weak and poorly constructed:
I was wondering if you’re happy with the federal response to the foreclosure crisis or if you think there’s more that either should have been or could be in the future done either through HAMP or Fannie and Freddie or various mechanisms?
And this one’s just lame:
I want to go back to the idea of working with Republicans. And given the comments from McConnell and — well, all of them — I think that what a lot of people find frustrating is that our side compromises and continues to compromise just to get that one Republican on. We’re going to get one of the Maine twins — whatever. And it doesn’t happen, and then by the time health care or whatever goes through we’ve compromised; we still don’t get any Republicans.
I don’t anticipate this changing in the next two years. I think it’s going to get worse. How are you going to get Democrats to understand that compromise means the other side has to give something sometimes, one day?
There were some good questions. Both were about gay rights. One was an exchange over gay marriage that took on the president’s evasiveness on the issue and issued some good follow-ups when Obama tried to evade getting pinned down.
I understand the analogy with the traditional press conference is hardly exact here. But it’s also not exactly an inspiring performance by the blogs.
You're right of course. Some of it was every bit as eye-rollingly vacuous as people who do that kind of thing for a living and who have training and experience interviewing politicos. Have you ever seen the Bush interview by Mike Allen? gagmewithaspoon.
Joe Sudbay did a very creditable job in addressing the Obama Administration's GLBT policies, and I came away with a better understanding of where the Obamabites are on the issue. He did a very good job, with good followup. Duncan Black didn't wrest any new information on HAMP, one of his pet issues. That was disappointing.
Overall, the session broke little ground in the news department. Kind of like that McCain -AP televised bull session with Ron Fournier and Liz Sidoti, complete with a standing ovation for McCain by the reporters of the Associated Press. Sprinkles!
Still, I think the reaching out was significant, and perhaps a mark of how the WH is going to look in the absence (Thank you Jesus!) of Rahm Emanual. The "professional left" is going to have to step up their game if this is going to be a regular occurrence.
#1 Posted by James, CJR on Thu 28 Oct 2010 at 10:28 AM
I don't understand. Isn't this snark? After all, those questions are a lot more substantive than anything the TradMed asks, even if they aren't as tough, or has focused, as some of us would like.
#2 Posted by Phil Perspective, CJR on Thu 28 Oct 2010 at 10:51 AM
The bloggers asked good questions such as, "Will you rule out raising the retirement age to 70?"
#3 Posted by Eric Jaffa, CJR on Thu 28 Oct 2010 at 10:51 AM
Completely Agree. Not one civil liberties question at all! When I read the first question I was shocked at how awful it was - what was he going to say? "Yeah I really liked it when that RP supporter stomped on that poor girl's head?" Honestly.
But maybe we don't know what happens behind closed doors or what questions were deemed off limits - or maybe the astounding presence of power just turned the bloggers to mush.
#4 Posted by ama, CJR on Thu 28 Oct 2010 at 10:58 AM
Meanwhile, journalists ask hard-hitting questions all the time don't they...
Hint: that was sarcasm.
#5 Posted by Robert, CJR on Thu 28 Oct 2010 at 11:59 AM
Show me better questions -- anytime, ever, Jon Stewart doesn't count -- from Legacy Media. Better yet, ask the President who he'd rather face again sometime soon: Diane, Katie and Brian? Or these amateur bloggers?
It's shameful watching Legacy Media -- and its cheerleaders -- criticize bloggers and Stewart today. Sure, I would have asked other questions, and there were some easy ones (look who DIDN'T get asked!) but by and large there was more news made out of that meeting than anything Legacy Media has given America during this presidential term.
#6 Posted by Teddy Partridge, CJR on Thu 28 Oct 2010 at 04:16 PM
I don't really get the criticism. I agree that the first question is silly. But the second is "weak and poorly constructed?" And the third is "just lame"? Sorry, I think the criticism is sophomoric. Please get off your high horse.
#7 Posted by Gary D, CJR on Thu 28 Oct 2010 at 04:58 PM
I wonder if people who get to interview any president are too intimidated to press the president because of the power of the office or they just don't want to offend him. I notice in any press conference they never question Obama or even when Bush was in office about the civil liberties of the prisoners we are holding, rendition etc.
#8 Posted by sanford sklansky, CJR on Thu 28 Oct 2010 at 05:03 PM
Let's see. We've got a group of slackjawed, weenie Liberals who couldn't get a real job if their life depended on it, asking questions of a guy who also has never had a real job. The only question they missed was: "Mithter Prethident, if you were a tree, what kind of tree would you be?" And this passes for journalism...heaven help us.
#9 Posted by Phil, CJR on Thu 28 Oct 2010 at 05:34 PM
You won't hear this question from mainstream media:
"And one of the things I’d like to ask you — and I think it’s a simple yes or no question too — is do you think that don’t ask, don’t tell is unconstitutional?"
Joe was polite but firm that nothing but a YES or NO answer would suffice. Obama refused to answer and gave a lame explanation which itself was very telling. I thought it was great.
#10 Posted by bmull, CJR on Thu 28 Oct 2010 at 09:37 PM
Whatever the quality of the bloggers' questions, this is a self-refuting criticism. One can't, with any credibility, complain about bloggers not asking substantive questions while not yourself providing any substance in your criticism. You can't just say "lame". You have to say why it's lame. Otherwise you criticism amounts to an appeal to authority: your own.
All I'm saying is that you didn't exactly cover yourself with glory, Ryan.
#11 Posted by dfhoughton, CJR on Fri 29 Oct 2010 at 11:10 AM
bmull, exactly. As I said, the gay-rights questions and follow-ups were very good.
dfhoughton, the "lame" question was transparently weak. If you don't see that, you're not going to see it, no matter what I say.
#12 Posted by Ryan Chittum, CJR on Fri 29 Oct 2010 at 12:49 PM
Agree Ryan, those bloggers talk a tough game but were emasculated. The "curb-stomp" question was particularly weak. It has a shelf-life of, what?? Maybe 24 hours? And that was the "Big News." Ugh. Not a singkle damn question about ongoing wars, drone attacks in theaters outside those wars, and how we're creating a new generation of terrorists. Two years to think of ONE question, and it's ripped from the newswire.
#13 Posted by Sheik Yerbouti, CJR on Fri 29 Oct 2010 at 04:06 PM
The posting seems rather petty, all in all. Ryan conveniently forgets that bloggers tend to not be in the business of daily reporting. Would you expect a plumber to have the same skills as an electrician?
I also thought the "lame" comment was, well, lame. The blogger's question may have been inarticulate, but the underlying point is reasonable from a leftist POV.
#14 Posted by Howard Boyce, CJR on Sat 30 Oct 2010 at 12:50 AM