This is one of the more disturbing stories I’ve read in a while. So far, no one in the mainstream press has touched it with the exception of Forbes’s Andy Greenberg. That needs to change quickly.
ThinkProgress reports that private security companies solicited by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce’s law firm proposed a ratfuck operation to discredit political opponents of the business lobby:
According to one document prepared by Team Themis, the campaign included an entrapment project. The proposal called for first creating a “false document, perhaps highlighting periodical financial information,” to give to a progressive group opposing the Chamber, and then to subsequently expose the document as a fake to undermine the credibility of the Chamber’s opponents. In addition, the group proposed creating a “fake insider persona” to “generate communications” with Change to Win.
The Tech Herald reported earlier that the same companies, HB Gary Federal, Palantir Technologies, and Berico Technologies, had pitched a similar operation to Bank of America to discredit Wikileaks and journalist supporters like Salon’s Glenn Greenwald.
Here’s Greenwald on them (emphasis mine):
For one thing, it turns out that the firms involved here are large, legitimate and serious, and do substantial amounts of work for both the U.S. Government and the nation’s largest private corporations (as but one example, see this email from a Stanford computer science student about Palantir).
Indeed:
And perhaps most disturbing of all, Hunton & Williams was recommended to Bank of America’s General Counsel by the Justice Department — meaning the U.S. Government is aiding Bank of America in its defense against/attacks on WikiLeaks.
This all came out in the open because an HB Gary Federal executive blabbed his mouth to the Financial Times last week about taking down the hacker group Anonymous. Anonymous promptly hacked that company’s email system and released 50,000 emails. That’s the only reason this report came to light.
The critical questions, obviously, are whether Bank of America and the Chamber signed off on any of this nuttiness. But we also need the press looking closely at these companies, and particularly HB Gary Federal and its government connections, like now.
Read the proposed smear plan here (on the Wikileaks site, naturally).
— Simon Johnson points to a study of stock sales by the CEOs of fourteen major financial institutions.
The key finding is that CEOs were “30 times more likely to be involved in a sell trade compared to an open market buy trade” of their own bank’s stock and “The dollar value of sales of stock by bank CEOs of their own bank’s stock is about 100 times the dollar value of open market buys”…
Interestingly, CEOs in the smallest banks in their sample did not sell much stock relative to their purchases of their own bank’s stock.
It also finds that the CEOs of these fourteen companies cashed out $2.6 billion worth of stock from 2000 to 2008.
Johnson doesn’t note this but even more interesting is Table 3 from the report by Sanjai Bhagat and Brian Bolton: It shows that CEOs accelerated their stock sales dramatically as the bubble inflated:

As Johnson says in his headline, the key question is:
What Did Bank CEOs Know And When Did They Know It?
— For your weekend reading pleasure, see Adam Gopnik’s excellent essay in The New Yorker on “How the Internet gets inside us.”
He reviews books like The Shallows and Cognitive Surplus and winds his way between the technophiles and technophobes, pointing out where their theories are too neat.
A social network is crucially different from a social circle, since the function of a social circle is to curb our appetites and of a network to extend them. Everything once inside is outside, a click away; much that used to be outside is inside, experienced in solitude. And so the peacefulness, the serenity that we feel away from the Internet, and which all the Better-Nevers rightly testify to, has less to do with being no longer harried by others than with being less oppressed by the force of your own inner life. Shut off your computer, and your self stops raging quite as much or quite as loud.

Based on the information that's released, and the possible Koch connection, people should be looking into things like the hacks at East Anglia and the DDOSing of both wikileaks and (up until last night) the Brad Blog.
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0211/49303.html
"The Kochs swear summit attendees to secrecy and few will talk publicly about the meetings or the brothers’ philanthropy for fear of jeopardizing relationships with — and potentially funding from — the Kochs, who have a reputation in conservative circles for retaliating against allies and former allies deemed insufficiently loyal.
Technically, the Kochs don’t control any groups, rather they exert significant influence through their contributions, board positions and patronage of the leaders of outfits that have been prominently featured at their donor conferences, such as Americans for Prosperity and Themis, a fledgling voter micro-targeting initiative spearheaded by former Koch staffer Karl Crow that in some ways seems designed to compete with an effort launched last year by the Rove and Gillespie-backed Crossroads Grassroots Policy Strategies."
If I remember correctly, there was serious jail time for tampering with a stupid person's insecure email account:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sarah_Palin_email_hack
The stuff these guys do is way beyond that. I said it before, these are the modern pinkertons and it reminds me of a scary talk I heard a while back when it first broke out that the government was using private security firms to capture information on its behalf to circumvent privacy laws (which it was ignoring anyways).
Link in a second.
#1 Posted by Thimbles, CJR on Sat 12 Feb 2011 at 12:43 AM
Here we are.
http://www.bradblog.com/?p=2473
Fascinating stuff.
#2 Posted by Thimbles, CJR on Sat 12 Feb 2011 at 01:05 AM
Some more essential reading:
http://www.salon.com/news/wikileaks/index.html?story=/opinion/greenwald/2011/02/11/campaigns
Another thing that hasn't been discussed is the strategy these goons outlined to take care of chamberwatch, a monitoring group of commerce. They were going to use a fake document, leaked to the group, to discredit the group.
Now chances are these types of strategies are not unique to this situation. This is likely part of a playbook in order to discredit opponents (although this strategy only works when the opponents are held to a standard of truth, unlike the standards we hold right wing media to such as fox news, talk radio, and the right wing blogosphere. Those individuals can make scandals up consistently and unashamedly without penalty.)
So say you have a reporter who broke a story on national tv that implicated you in something like... say... torture and now you want to destroy this person. You could use the old fake document play.
And suddenly Mary Mapes is out of a job:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Killian_documents_controversy
#3 Posted by Thimbles, CJR on Sat 12 Feb 2011 at 11:02 PM
Ever since our liberties were first codified and adopted in the Constitution and Bill of Rights these liberties have been under assault and will continue to be under assault so long as there is power to be gained or money to be made by such actions.
#4 Posted by robert thornton, CJR on Mon 14 Feb 2011 at 02:00 PM