We are in the midst of the worst Washington scandal since Watergate.
That’s Peggy Noonan today in The Wall Street Journal, and no, she will not be laughed out of Washington. There are papers to sell and clicks to harvest. Forget about the fact that there’s zero evidence of any White House involvement in the IRS flagging Tea Party groups, and forget about past scandals like Iran-Contra, the Iraq War, the US Attorneys, and Bill Clinton lying under oath about hooking up with an intern.
As I wrote yesterday, it’s hard to get too worked up about Tea Party applicants getting flagged when journalism startups got the same treatment—and the nonprofit-news applicants had a much better case for approval than Tea Party groups.
But Noonan also alleges that the IRS, under the White House’s direction, targeted individual conservative activists with tax audits. That would be a serious crime, but here’s all her evidence for such a serious allegation:
The second part of the scandal is the auditing of political activists who have opposed the administration. The Journal’s Kim Strassel reported an Idaho businessman named Frank VanderSloot, who’d donated more than a million dollars to groups supporting Mitt Romney. He found himself last June, for the first time in 30 years, the target of IRS auditors. His wife and his business were also soon audited. Hal Scherz, a Georgia physician, also came to the government’s attention. He told ABC News: “It is odd that nothing changed on my tax return and I was never audited until I publicly criticized ObamaCare.” Franklin Graham, son of Billy, told Politico he believes his father was targeted. A conservative Catholic academic who has written for these pages faced questions about her meager freelance writing income. Many of these stories will come out, but not as many as there are. People are not only afraid of being audited, they’re afraid of saying they were audited.
All of these IRS actions took place in the years leading up to the 2012 election. They constitute the use of governmental power to intrude on the privacy and shackle the political freedom of American citizens. The purpose, obviously, was to overwhelm and intimidate—to kill the opposition, question by question and audit by audit.
It is not even remotely possible that all this was an accident, a mistake.
Here’s the problem. The IRS audits about 1.5 million individual tax returns a year. Guess what? Some of those 1.5 million unlucky taxpayers will be conservative political activists. Some of those will be liberal political activists. What about all the big conservative donors who weren’t audited? There’s just no evidence that activists that individuals were targeted based on their political views or that conservatives got audited disproportionately.
You, average American, have a little better than 1 percent chance of getting audited in any given year, and your chance of getting audited is much higher if you make lots of money, like VanderSloot and Scherz, and if you take lots of write-offs. Betcha George Soros has been audited a time or two, and not necessarily during Republican administrations.
In other words, it’s not smart to pick up a handful of anecdotes from across the country and turn them into evidence of a Nixonian conspiracy that threatens the republic. (Another outlet doing this is ABC, which ratcheted up the Benghazi story last week with a false report by Jonathan Karl based on misrepresented documents that apparently came from Republicans in Congress, according to CBS).

What you miss completely is her point that Pres Obama is a bystander and not engaged as the chief executive. We heard about certain groups being subjected to extra scrutiny concerning their 501 (c)(3) applications over a tear ago. And the President just learned about it?
"The buck stops here" doesn't apply to Pres Obama. It's always the fault of someone else. Don't take responsibility and shift the blame to someone else, preferably Republicans.
I doubt that Peggy Noonan will "be laughed out of Washington." That will, more than likely, apply to the Obama administration apologists who go to great lengths to deflect criticism.
You may be "whistling past the graveyard" on this one. The lack of integrity, the hubris, the lack of engagement and ineptitude (thinking of the State Department) has not gone unnoticed by most Americans.
#1 Posted by John Folsom, CJR on Fri 17 May 2013 at 07:49 AM
Good olumn, but your headline and the way you lead into column looks strangely similar to Andrew Sullivan's post on the topic
#2 Posted by RP, CJR on Fri 17 May 2013 at 08:41 AM
Bod Woodward just described Obama's Benghazi-Gate scandal as very similar to Watergate.
#3 Posted by Dave , CJR on Fri 17 May 2013 at 09:30 AM
Good point, RP. I'll add a hat tip to Sullivan
#4 Posted by Ryan Chittum, CJR on Fri 17 May 2013 at 11:47 AM
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reagan_administration_scandals
You would think Peggy learned something about the gravity and scale of scandals from the Reagan Administration. This is not on the scale of Iran-Contra, HUD,EPA,Debategate all bigger deals were President R. had knowledge.
#5 Posted by BD, CJR on Fri 17 May 2013 at 12:54 PM
I thought the premise is IRS has admitted (http://news.yahoo.com/irs-apologizes-targeting-conservative-groups-144349480.html) that they wrongfully targeted conservative group in their tax-exempt organization application for more scrutiny and reviews. So the question whether or not conservative group has harsher treatment compare to journalism startup is not an issue anymore. Conservative group got "special" treatment. Now it is just a matter of whether or not it is linked to White House. So if it is not connected to White House, then I guess White House is just incompetence in hiring good IRS agents because of their repeated mistakes on getting phone records in AP & targeting conservative groups. Of course firing the head IRS (Steven Miller) couple of weeks before he is supposed to leave would be great indicator that Obama is taking a decisive action. If it is proven to be connected then White House is lying in this matter.
#6 Posted by GC, CJR on Fri 17 May 2013 at 03:24 PM
Chittum's point is undercut somewhat by the fact that he just wrote an article alleging a conspiracy from a handful of data points about nonprofit press groups.
#7 Posted by Tom T., CJR on Sat 18 May 2013 at 12:35 AM
Funny no one mentions that over a 27 moth period not one progressive/liberal groups were investigated and most applications from these groups were fast tracked to 501 status.
#8 Posted by G Cruz, CJR on Sat 18 May 2013 at 10:46 AM
Tom T.,
I did no such thing.
Read it again, and then read what I wrote in November. The point is this appears to be SOP for reviewing nonprofit applicants in the Cincy office.
#9 Posted by Ryan Chittum, CJR on Sat 18 May 2013 at 01:23 PM
All of CJR's and MSM's shameless apologia for the criminal regime is easily DESTROYED, here: http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2013/05/the-biggest-obama-scandals-are-proven-and-ignored/275960/ SMH & LMAO @ the court historians and gatekeepers.
#10 Posted by Dan A., CJR on Sun 19 May 2013 at 07:35 PM
No evidence? What evidence is there that liberal activists were audited? Of course, it may be that some were audited in the normal course of events, but that doesn't preclude that individuals such as Vander Sloot had not been singled out. As for George Soros - there is no evidence he has ever been audited! Where is your evidence?
#11 Posted by Mike Sarkisian, CJR on Sun 26 May 2013 at 12:53 AM