WaPo, Newsweek’s Stumper blog, Politico, and several others use headlines today rechristening former favorite Hillary Clinton as the new “underdog” of the race. Allow us to offer a clarification of terms. The underdog is the individual or team expected to lose going into a particular contest. Once the contest is actually taking place, the underdog can pull a surprise upset or perform as expected, but, even if he wins, he remains the underdog. Conversely, UCONN’s players do not become the underdogs because they are down fifteen points at half-time. They’re still the favorites, they’re just losing.
04:03 PM - January 8, 2008
Hillary Clinton is not the underdog…
A clarification of terms.
It doesn’t add up - A science writer questions the conventional wisdom of US-born STEM workers
#Realtalk: Dear reader - For small sites, loyalty might be a better path to pageviews
Falling for internet hoaxes - Some people who share satire don’t realize they’re missing the punchline
Digital First plans layoffs (Updated) - High-level executives and high-profile digital projects targeted
‘Nobody’s that lucky’—except in Florida’s lottery? - Palm Beach Post ferrets out lottery fraud, prompts tightening of “meager” safeguards
Email blasts from CJR writers and editors
Or SF’s housing crisis explained
“I’m very sorry, but The New York Times is always the prettiest girl at the party”
Graphene, the material of tomorrow
We escaped the tyranny of MSM gatekeepers only to replace it with the tyranny of the “news of the day”
Despite the bridge scandal, Chris Christie’s state is relatively transparent and accountable. CJR’s Greg Marx talks to Gordon Witkin
Who Owns What
A report from the Columbia University Graduate School of Journalism
Questions and exercises for journalism students.