Sorry about that headline—but hey, if you can’t beat ‘em
So far, we at CJR haven’t paid much attention to this dastardly “Weinergate” business. But the congressman’s blitz of interviews yesterday was fantastically awkward television, if lacking much in the way of substance and news value. Weiner sat down with Fox News’s Bret Baier, CBS’s Nancy Cordes, ABC’s Jonathan Karl, NBC’s Luke Russert, MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow, and CNN’s Wolf Blitzer. Each powered professionally through their interviews, but it was hard not to see on their faces and hear in their voices a certain pang—something that read: it was never supposed to be like this.
As we said, it was wonderfully squirmy stuff. Especially good was the moment where Baier struggled for just the right TV-ready words for the issue in hand. “Is there a picture out there of you in your ” he began, gesticulating and pausing to find just the right thing to say. He settled upon the antiquated “drawers.”
But the best of the bunch was definitely the Blitzer interview. There’s just something about Wolf in a story like this.
First this:
BLITZER: This is the picture - I’m sure you’ve seen it by now. Is this you?
Then this:
BLITZER: Well, we just want to resolve it once and for all. You would know if this is your underpants, for example.
And because he’s a digger:
BLITZER: Have you ever taken a picture of yourself like this?
While the TV newsmen and women have been dancing around exactly how to describe the picture—repeat after me, “an erect penis in a pair of briefs,” not so hard—the print, the web, and the chyron writers are having a ball. (Sorry.) Weiner has said consistently in interviews this week that with a name like his he’s used to a drumming. And to go by the way headline-writers are treating him, he’s not wrong. It looks like we’re going to see a lot of “swelling controversies” and “suspicious packages” as Weiner sticks this one out.
Ahem.
Anyway, we thought we’d gather together some of the best.
Here are Weiner’s hometown papers, the Post and the Daily News:


Here’s a nice play from Death + Taxes:

HuffPo had fun with a Rush Limbaugh tweet:

Even Howard Kurtz is getting in on the action:

The jokes about the, errr drawers, can creep in even when you might not have meant them to. Take this sentence in Josh Kraushaar’s piece at the National Journal today about the chance a Republican could pick up Weiner’s seat. It’s all very scholarly until
Weiner himself faced his toughest re-election in his career last year, winning 59 percent of the vote against an underfunded Republican opponent. For Weiner, that was a limp performance
Our emphasis.
But our award for best headline goes to a Gawker recap of a Fox News segment. Not for any clever pun or twist. But for its sheer deadpan can’t-argue-with-that-ness.

No doubt.

Meares writes: "So far, we at CJR haven't paid much attention to this dastardly "Weinergate" business."
No, not much attention at all. We did, however, review six interviews with Weiner, scan numerous blog posts, and survey the front pages of several newspapers in hopes of finding funny headlines. Oh, did we mention that we also wrote a blog post ourselves on the subject?
But, save and except all of that, we at CJR have not paid much attention at all.
#1 Posted by Anthony, CJR on Thu 2 Jun 2011 at 02:54 PM
Ha! The clowns over at Breitbart really thought they were going to bring down another liberal with this pathetic stunt. Mr. Weiner is handling it just exactly right, like a silly, juvenile prank by a bunch of rightwing lunatics who never matured beyone junior high school.
Funnier still is the pearl-clutching and heavy breathing by the network and cable "reporters." This should prove that they are no better than tabloid hacks.
Great fun!
#2 Posted by James, CJR on Thu 2 Jun 2011 at 03:00 PM
Our country is falling apart and you spend all this time on a worthless story? Is there any chance that soon the news people are going to stop the politics and start helping the public understand what is going on in the world that REALLY means something???
#3 Posted by Sharon Conley, CJR on Thu 2 Jun 2011 at 05:28 PM
Oh c'mon. Give these news people a break. They write or report on deficits, unemployment, Republicans vs. Democrats and other Big Topics of the Day. Let them have a little fun. Besides, the congressman isn't helping with his vague answers to pointed questions. Even serious journalists want to give us reason to laugh a little.
#4 Posted by Mike Wright, CJR on Thu 2 Jun 2011 at 06:11 PM
Well, what is he supposed to say? "No, I know that's not me. Jon Stewart was right." I mean, what everyone is trying to find out is Mr Weiner is really, uh, that well-endowed. He is supposed to assure them that he is not?
Two things you might have mentioned, @Joel, that are germane to the story that everyone in Washington is trying to make into a scandal. The scandal is, as Jeffery Toobin noted, that CNN put Andrew Breitbart on to accuse Mr. Weiner of being a pedophile, and throwing up their hands "Well, I guess we'll never know!" I mean, can't you say anything about that, as a media critic?
Secondly, you might have mentioned this creepy guy who actually sent the picture, who has some ...very interesting marital/girlfriend problems, and apparently is a paranoid conspiracy theorist who fears the Clintonistas.
Leaked Emails Show Tip To Breitbart About Weiner Tweet | TPMMuckraker
I mean, if you are going to flog this story, fun as it is, how about focusing on the other side, too?
#5 Posted by James, CJR on Thu 2 Jun 2011 at 06:44 PM
What do you think about this piece, @Joel?
Police could figure out Weiner guilt or innocence - Yahoo! News
I mean, police, guilt or innocence? Of what?
Look at this, from the linked piece:
The editorial board of the Daily News of New York said it believes Weiner when he denies sending the photograph, but it said his refusal to let law enforcement investigate is suspicious.
Oh my. the Associated Press is carrying water for the editorial board of the Daily News. suspicious? Because he didn't "let law enforcement investigate"? Who the hell is the editorial board of the Daily News?
What a bunch of hacks are at the Associated Press. Now, I get where you think it is fun stuff, @Joel, to joke about the Weiner/weiner thing, and I agree that the reluctance to say "an erect penis in a pair of briefs" is hilarious. But there is some serious hackery out there, insinuating the Rep Weiner has committed some crime of some sort, and NOBODY is talking about Breitbart's part in this, and his allegations of pedophilia.
What a bunch of Brietbart-water-carrying hacks is the national press.
#6 Posted by James, CJR on Thu 2 Jun 2011 at 09:26 PM
James is being a little hard on
Joel for having a little fun with the Weiner
story. After all, while the standards here are rigid,
there's no need to be that stiff,
James. So carry on Joel, This thing will peter
out in a while and every member
of the press or other media organ-
ization will find another story that will prick
up their ears.
#7 Posted by padikiller, CJR on Thu 2 Jun 2011 at 10:11 PM
Padikiller defending Joel Meares' reporting. Now I've seen it all.
...And who knew, Mr. Padikiller, about that deeply suppressed sense of humor of yours? A banner day in the world of the blogosphere commentariat.
#8 Posted by James, CJR on Thu 2 Jun 2011 at 10:18 PM
@James, @Anthony
I admit I knew I would be stepping into it on this one. But this particular post was done purely for fun, a salute to ridiculous puns that would hopefully amuse you guys. Same rationale as Mike Wright mentions in these comments. I agree that there are some serious issues here—the idea of a smear, the danger of hacking into a congressman's account etc, and, were there any truth to this whole thing, a whole can of other issues—but we were leaving them aside for a minute for a laugh. And Anthony, I didn't spend nearly as much of my day as I wish I had of on this.
#9 Posted by Joel Meares, CJR on Thu 2 Jun 2011 at 10:23 PM
Fair enough, @Joel. I think it's kind of a fun diversion myself.
Cheers.
#10 Posted by James, CJR on Thu 2 Jun 2011 at 11:11 PM
+1 for Padikiller. Well done, sir.
#11 Posted by Justin Peters, CJR on Fri 3 Jun 2011 at 01:09 AM
"And Anthony, I didn't spend nearly as much of my day as I wish I had of on this."
Thank God CJR employs more than one writer. But you need an editor: it's "had've"...
#12 Posted by Anthony, CJR on Fri 3 Jun 2011 at 11:39 AM
I heard the NPR report by David Welna the day the Weiner story broke, and there was no mention of what the student herself had to say. Shouldn't that have been reported in this and all the other pieces?
http://www.nydailynews.com/ny_local/2011/05/29/2011-05-29_statement_from_gennette_cordova_student_who_was_sent_lewd_twitter_photo_from_rep.html
#13 Posted by Harris Meyer, CJR on Fri 3 Jun 2011 at 02:50 PM
@Anthony. Touché.
#14 Posted by Joel Meares, CJR on Fri 3 Jun 2011 at 03:35 PM
@Sharon Conley
You do realize that the point of covering the media is to write about the silly things the media is over-covering, right?
#15 Posted by ESB, CJR on Sat 4 Jun 2011 at 04:57 PM
Now that Weiner is weepy sorry...what do the people who thought that this was a prank think now?
#16 Posted by PeterO, CJR on Mon 6 Jun 2011 at 11:17 PM
What do I think? I'm sorry the guy put himself in the position that the rightwing zealots could take him down like this -- he was the only one trying to draw attention to Clarence Thomas' corruption as demonstrated by his late-Friday-afternoon news dump of his financial records.
I'm sorry he embarrassed himself. Obviously, sending a crotch shot and a shirtless picture doesn't rise to the level of criminal behavior like Senator Ensign's paying off of his girlfriend's husband and badgering his constituents to give the husband a job as a lobbyist, and probably Clarence Thomas' dumping of his "amended" financial statements that demonstrate that he lied about his wife's finances. Sending a shirtless picture of oneself doesn't rise to that level of criminal behavior, to the great disinterest of giddy reporters amazed at the package of Mr. Weiner.
I'm also sorry that ABC appears to be collaborating with a known fabricator and liar, but of course that's not the first time they have done that. Just ask any journo what they really think of Brian Ross and John Stossel.
And I'm also sorry that the White House Press Corps seems fascinated with the size of the guy's penis - there was quite a discussion about that before the briefing today.
And I'm also sorry, and kind of embarrassed, that this kind of National Enquirer-level story sends national political reporters into a giddy frenzy of high-horse moralizing at the expense of legitimate news topics.
And finally, I'm also sorry that the Ds don't get their act together and get some better oppo research on the *actual* criminals and perverts in the GOP, and start fighting fire with fire.
#17 Posted by James, CJR on Tue 7 Jun 2011 at 12:09 AM
Unable to beat off his critics, Weiner's problem is as hard as ever. In fact it's grown to such proportions that he seems unable to get his hands around it. He should have kept things zipped up - especially in this day and age when just one thoughtless ejaculation can ruin a career. There are inevitably leaks that quickly turn into a deluge. And now he's got a big mess in his lap.
#18 Posted by JLD, CJR on Tue 7 Jun 2011 at 08:23 AM
James wrote (paraphrasing) : The damned lying Republicans have really screwed Weiner over... Blah, blah, blah... Weiner was a good guy who was working hard to take down Republicans... Blah, blah.. blah... It isn't fair that he got caught up in a National Enquirer level story.... Blah.. blah.. blah.. This kind of story is an embarrassing bunch of nonsense crap that the press should ignore...
Now let's go do it to a Republican...
#19 Posted by padikiller, CJR on Tue 7 Jun 2011 at 08:32 AM