It’s amazing what can find it’s way into the pages of a newspaper’s op-ed section. This morning, the Washington Post’s Richard Cohen was given the green light by his editors to enlighten the ignorant masses about the leftist conspiracy (or perhaps Stalinist, as he darkly hints late in the piece) to send Scooter Libby to jail.
According to Cohen, “at the urging of the liberal press,” special prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald was appointed to look into the outing of CIA agent Valerie Plame, and ended up putting poor Scooter in jail for the negligible crime of lying under oath? After all, as Cohen says, government officials should not be “called to account for practicing the dark art of politics. As with sex or real estate, it is often best to keep the lights off.”
Is Cohen seriously advocating that government officials not be held accountable for their (illegal) actions, since they’re just practicing “politics?” While it’s an argument Richard Nixon would certainly love, it’s not only bad policy, but incredibly irresponsible journalism to suggest that such things should just be left alone. Any journalist who advocates a position like this should hand over their laptop, because it’s apparent that they don’t take their profession seriously.
And that’s not even the half of it. By portraying the driving force behind Fitzgerald’s prosecution as the “liberal media,” Cohen makes a pathetic attempt to rewrite history. I’ll leave it to Salon’s Glenn Greenwald to knock this one out of the park.
The Libby prosecution clearly was the dirty work of the leftist anti-war movement in this country, just as Cohen describes. After all, the reason Patrick Fitzgerald was appointed to investigate this matter was because a left-wing government agency (known as the “Central Intelligence Agency”) filed a criminal referral with the Justice Department, as the MoveOn-sympathizer CIA officials were apparently unhappy about the public unmasking of one of their covert agents.
In response, Bush’s left-wing anti-war Attorney General, John Ashcroft, judged the matter serious enough to recuse himself, leading Bush’s left-wing anti-war Deputy Attorney General, James Comey, to conclude that a Special Prosecutor was needed. In turn, Comey appointed Fitzgerald, the left-wing anti-war Republican Prosecutor and Bush appointee, who secured a conviction of Libby, in response to which left-wing anti-war Bush appointee Judge Reggie Walton imposed Libby’s sentence.

Paul McLeary Wrote
According to Cohen, "at the urging of the liberal press," special prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald was appointed to look into the outing of CIA agent Valerie Plame, and ended up putting poor Scooter in jail for the negligible crime of lying under oath? After all, as Cohen says, government officials should not be "called to account for practicing the dark art of politics. As with sex or real estate, it is often best to keep the lights off."
Is Cohen seriously advocating that government officials not be held accountable for their (illegal) actions, since they're just practicing "politics?"
padikiller wonders
You mean like Bill Clinton was held accountable by the MSM for lying under oath to a grand jury?...
Or like the MSM demanded a federal prison sentence for Sandy Berg(l)er, Clinton's National Security Advisor who confessed to stealing and destroying classified documents from the National Archives?..
LOL!...
The colorblind press was RIGHT there DEMANDING that Clinton and Berg(l)er do hard time for their admitted crimes, right?...
Oh BROTHER, what an infantile rant from this crybaby of toothless "watchdog"!...
CJR needs to dispatch Mr. McLeary on a long-term sabbatical to Realityville for journalistic therapy!...
Nonetheless, even the greatest stupidity in McLearyland can make a fun read, once in a while...
Shine on, you crazy diamond!...
Posted by padikiller
on Tue 19 Jun 2007 at 02:14 PM
Cohen's column was amazing. In particular I find it remarkable that people like Cohen can blame "liberals" for things they don't like during a period when conservatives control all branches of government and proudly boast about the fact that they pay no attention to what liberals say.
These same people are already preparing to blame liberals for the war in Iraq.
Posted by kweberlit
on Tue 19 Jun 2007 at 04:52 PM
Now Leaving McLearyland-Welcome to Realityville!
"MSNBC.com identified 144 journalists who made political contributions from 2004 through the start of the 2008 campaign, according to the public records of the Federal Election Commission. Most of the newsroom checkbooks leaned to the left: 125 journalists gave to Democrats and liberal causes. Only 17 gave to Republicans. Two gave to both parties…The pattern of donations, with nearly nine out of 10 giving to Democratic candidates and causes, appears to confirm a leftward tilt in newsrooms — at least among the donors, who are a tiny fraction of the roughly 100,000 staffers in newsrooms across the nation."
EIGHTY-EIGHT PERCENT OF THE JOURNALISTS GAVE TO DEMOCRATS WHILE ONLY THIRTEEN PERCENT GAVE TO REPUBLICANS!
But there's no bias in the MSM news business!....
RIGHT?......
Posted by padikiller
on Thu 21 Jun 2007 at 10:39 AM
From a cross section of 144 journalists you can derive that 88 percent of journalist gave to democrats and 13 gave to republicans? There's some creative math in action for you right there. So, how many journalists didn't give donate at all? If we're to believe your figures, first off, there's 101% of journalists. Apparently they count as more people than the average man or woman. Second, we have to believe they have nothing better to do than donate money to the political campaigns. I find both suspect. Nice try though.
Posted by AhmNee
on Mon 25 Jun 2007 at 06:43 AM
AhmNee Dodges
From a cross section of 144 journalists you can derive that 88 percent of journalist gave to democrats and 13 gave to republicans?
padikiller rings the Reality Bell
Er.... No.....
Not me... MSNBC did....
And by the way... This "inference" of yours has a name... It's called A-R-I-T-H-M-E-T-I-C
The simple reality here is that MSNBC has confirmed what EVERY SINGLE OTHER STUDY I'VE SEEN has also confirmed... Namely that Democrats outnumber Republicans at about a 9 t0 1 ratio in that wacky world of "professional journalism"...
AhmNee just can't deal with the reality
If we're to believe your figures, first off, there's 101% of journalists....
padikiller keeps it real
Nice try, Sport, but NO cigar!....
First of all... They are not "my" figures... THEY ARE MSNBC's figures... Repeat this little slice of reality over and over again to yourself until your lips stop moving and just maybe a couple of your neurons will wrap their strained synapses around the uncomplicated concept...
Secondly... The REASON that the percentages total more than 100% (as you would know if you actually read something about the report) is that two of the journalists gave to both parties...
Read first, Sport... THEN post...
Posted by padikiller
on Mon 25 Jun 2007 at 07:28 AM
A note on "diversity" in "professional journalism"
The MSM world pf "professional journalism" is rife with calls for "diversity" among its ranks...
There are frequent calls for racial parity... For cultural parity.. For religious parity... For sexual parity....
But despite that fact that study after study shows that liberals outnumber conservative "professional journalists" by a 9 to 1 margin...
You don't see any calls for political parity....
NOTE: CJR has chosen to utterly ignore the MSNBC story... Surprise, surprise...
Go figure...
The standard MSM response from the "professional journalists" is that the mere fact that the overwhleming majority of their ranks are flaming liberals does noe mean that they can't do their jobs impartially.... And so their is simply no need to seek out counterpoint...
This silly argument is the SAME stupid nonsense that was used to fight against racial integration...
Posted by padikiller
on Mon 25 Jun 2007 at 07:37 AM