In 2007, Cherelle Jackson started publishing a three-part series of investigative reports that examined plans to develop tourism on an uninhabited island in her home country of Samoa.
“The story involved some high profile investors and politicians,” she recalls. “It was to reveal names of everyone involved and their parts in the story. I investigated the history, agreements of the land lease, the environmental impacts of the project, social impacts, and how much of the EIA [environmental impact assessment] was altered in favor of the investor. It took me five years to investigate the story. In the end, I had to get the EIA from a low-level environment officer, who did it under the table. This is after exhausting all other official routes to obtain the EIA which is a public document.”
After the first two parts of series were published, Jackson began receiving threatening phone calls, and two days before the last of the stories was to be published, the office of her newspaper, Newsline Samoa burned down. It’s not officially known whether there was any link to her investigative reports, because authorities never carried out an investigation, she says.
Jackson lost most of the documents she had collected in the fire. With her family worried for her safety, she left the country for a month. She and her editor-in-chief, whom she credits for keeping the newspaper alive, agreed not to run the final piece.
Today, May 3, marks World Press Freedom Day, a time to consider the many forces that are keeping the world’s press from being truly free, and pay homage to those journalists who have sacrificed their lives for the cause of informing us. Let’s also keep in mind just how dangerous it can be to report on the environment.
Threats on the Rise
Media and the general public pay surprisingly little attention to the risks facing journalists on the green beat—perhaps because there are simply fewer such journalists compared to those who cover other risky subjects such as war and corruption. Reporters Without Borders (RSF) has produced the best work on the subject, publishing a report about the dangers facing environmental journalists worldwide in September 2009, which it updated last year.
The report provides details on numerous cases of environmental journalists being harassed, threatened, attacked, sued, imprisoned, and even killed (or at least gone missing). At the Copenhagen climate conference in December 2009, RSF’s Vincent Brossel told CJR that the number of cases is growing and that, as of 2009, about 15 percent of all threats his organization monitors are linked to issues such as pollution, logging, and the impacts of climate change. According to the report:
The assailants are not always who you might expect. In most cases, the violence is the work of thugs in the pay of criminal entrepreneurs or corrupt politicians. But in some countries, as Reporters Without Borders has found, the local population paradoxically often supports those responsible for deforestation or polluting factories although it is the most direct victim… Those who get rich by despoiling resources are able, in the process, to provide work to those in most need. As a result, combating deforestation and pollution is often difficult and thankless work.
The fight is all the more unequal for usually being waged in countries where all the machinery of state seems to be an accomplice to the crimes and where the judicial apparatus, when it exists, does not play its role. Most cases linked to the environment never reach a conclusion in the courts. You can even say that most journalists are on their own when it comes to defending themselves. Hence the importance of making this struggle known and mobilizing public opinion in its support.
Most, but not all, of the cases occur in non-democratic countries. The report cites examples in Egypt, Cambodia, Guinea-Bissau, Congo, China, Burma, Uzbekistan, Brazil, Bulgaria, Russia, Peru, Indonesia, Sri Lanka, Vietnam, Argentina, and the Philippines.