PROVO, UT — Journalists in Arizona, New Mexico, Colorado, and Utah have raised vital policy, political, and accountability issues as US senators debate an 844-page immigration bill. Even so, journalists can do more to scope out special interest influence behind the proposal―drafted by the so-called Gang of Eight―as well as learn from great examples of watchdog reporting in the Four Corners region.
In a deeply reported package of stories published in early April, Arizona Republic reporter Bob Ortega and photojournalist Nick Oza raise questions about the effectiveness of border improvements and take a close look at some of the consequences of the government’s $100-billion effort to secure the border. Ortega’s article draws some striking conclusions—including this one:
This picture suggests that the costs of securing the border already have been extraordinarily high, not just in dollars, but in lives. It suggests that all of this security has done little to stanch the flow of millions of pounds of drugs north—or of 250,000 guns a year and billions of dollars south. And it suggests, as those who have studied this issue closely maintain, that locking down the entire border would be prohibitively expensive and still fail to halt drug smuggling.
The most frequent victims of this change in routes have been the migrants themselves. Even as fewer people cross illegally, more of them are dying. Last fiscal year, Border Patrol agents rescued 1,333 migrants, according to CBP. But 477 migrants died trying to cross from Mexico. Compared with five years ago, 20 percent more died last year even as Border Patrol apprehensions fell by 58 percent.
Looked at as a ratio, a migrant was three times likelier to die crossing the border last year than in 2007.
The storytelling is impressive, and offers a steady supply of telling details—like Oza’s photo of the carpet overshoes worn by a smuggler to cover his tracks while crossing the border. The package also includes a photo slideshow and personal stories of immigrants, a video interview with a border rancher, and an interactive map.
The Republic’s reporting raises issues absent in most reporting about the immigration debate—how drugs and guns continue to move steadily across a porous border, and how security upgrades have pushed migrants to less populated areas in eastern Arizona, where drug cartels have an increasing presence in the border-crossing business. It’s long, but well worth a read.
Nothing in the last month of coverage of the policy debate in Washington offers the same level of ambition and enterprise as the Republic’s border reporting. But the Salt Lake Tribune, Denver Post, Arizona Republic, and Albuquerque Journal all do have a presence in DC. That has allowed the papers to track the role being played in the immigration debate by officials from the West, and provide coverage that other media outlets in the region have abdicated in favor of generic and less costly wire reports.
For example, as the national Republican party looks for a path forward on immigration reform in the wake of Mitt Romney’s poor showing among Hispanic voters, the 2010 Utah Compact—an unlikely product of a red state where business leaders, law enforcement officials, politicians, social welfare advocates, Catholics, and Mormons agree on principles for reform—has laid philosophical groundwork for the current debate. The Tribune has followed that story, as in a dispatch by Thomas Burr about former Utah Attorney General Mark Shurtleff’s testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee.
And the Tribune’s Matt Canham has tracked Republican Sen. Orrin Hatch’s behind-the-scenes role and shifting position on the immigration debate. An April 12 story outlined Hatch’s work to broker a deal on guest worker programs for farms and ranches; that followed a Hatch-led effort to expand visas for highly-skilled immigrants sought by the tech industry.