In his “Stories I’d like to see” column, journalist and entrepreneur Steven Brill spotlights topics that, in his opinion, have received insufficient media attention. This article was originally published on Reuters.com.
1. Media tug of war in China:
Last week, Bloomberg.com posted an amazing story, accompanied by graphics and clickable family trees, that unraveled how the “princeling” ancestors of China’s “Eight Immortals” - the generals and party leaders who built the communist superpower - now control the country’s leading industrial and financial conglomerates. The New York Times has also been on the case, detailing in articles like this one and this one how those controlling China’s national and regional governments have showered favors on their entrepreneurial relatives.
Then, last Friday the Times added a report describing heightened Internet blocking measures that Chinese authorities are taking to keep these kinds of stories about Chinese crony capitalism and other scandals from being seen online in China. The new efforts to firewall information that would embarrass the ruling class even include trying to block offending content from reaching the virtual private networks (VPNs) used by corporations to ensure the privacy and security of the information their employees transmit around the world.
It’s all fascinating, important stuff. But it’s only the opening rumble of what could be one of the major business and political stories of 2013. After all, this is the kind of information that threatens to overturn the implicit deal with the citizenry that the Communist Party rulers have depended on for the last two decades: let us rule and we won’t act like Communists when it comes to giving you economic opportunity.
Yet maintaining a digital firewall seems fruitless - and trying to is hardly going to go unnoticed.
So, this confrontation is going to be worth constant coverage. News organizations ought to set the scene now for the fight that’s coming by giving us the scoops on:
—What are corporations doing to protect their VPNs? And what do they know about what the Chinese are doing to penetrate or block them? Let’s see a story on this cat and mouse game.
—What are the potential consequences for China’s economy and for international trade of creating that kind of hostile communications environment? And will Western countries hoping to send their talent to work in China find recruiting more difficult if, once they get there, these Westerners are cut off from knowing what’s going on in the world? Will a visiting executive’s smart phone be blocked, too? Will major universities cut back on foreign exchange programs if their students studying in China will also be cut off from the world if the universities’ VPNs are blocked?
—We know that access to the Bloomberg and Times websites have been cut off in China. But has its reporting on the Chinese rulers affected Bloomberg’s more important business in China? Are its market data terminals - the company’s core revenue producers - also being blocked? What about Bloomberg’s access to data related to Chinese markets? And might any of this be helping Bloomberg’s competitors, such as Dow Jones or Reuters?
—Of course, there are leaks in the great Internet firewall. So hasn’t what the Chinese have read so far about all of the scandals and cronyism simply whetted their appetites for more? What are people doing to get around the wall? To what extent are these stepped up efforts to block the flow of embarrassing news not only making people more eager to read it and gossip about it but also generating more ingenious and aggressive efforts to get around the wall? With that in mind, I’d love to see a (probably impossible) story in which a news organization uses pollsters to find out what the average Chinese citizen actually knows about all the scandals - and about all the efforts to block them from knowing.