First: a confession. I have not been a particularly diligent media reporter where Glenn Beck is concerned. In fact, I don’t think I have ever watched an episode or even a few minutes of his 5 p.m. Fox News program since its debut in 2009. My only experience with Beck, other than reading about him, was back in 2006 when I caught a couple of episodes of his HLN show. I was on vacation in Hawaii from Australia, and, struggling with the time differences, taking a decent amount of Ambien to regulate my circadian whatnots. Early every evening, the previous night’s dose would turn me into a smiling zombie and I would lie on my spinning bed—I swear it was—as Beck held court on the hotel room TV. The strange man made me giggle.
This morning I watched the first bit of Beck I’ve seen since those halcyon Hawaiian days and not much has changed, except I didn’t need the drugs for the spinning to start. The bit was a segment from last night’s show in which Beck “explains” the allegedly very mutual and amicable decision to leave the network “transition off” Fox later this year.
A lot of smart enough stuff has been written about Beck’s leaving. I tend to agree with Salon’s Alex Pareene that it’s probably a mutually beneficial thing—Beck makes more money off the air than on, and he’s a fast-falling commodity for the network. My favorite line among all the Beck goodbye analysis, though, comes from The New York Times, always looking to take a rather too erudite tone with stories like this: “Critics loudly condemned him for living with his own facts ” Let’s call a spade a spade. The guy was doing more than “living with his own facts.”
But for the best insight into why Beck will be leaving Fox’s hallowed halls sooner than later, just watch Beck himself tell you why. There he was last night, next to his famous blackboard—featuring a map of the world marked with dollar signs and stars and crescents—and in front of some ladders, naturally, explaining that he never really wanted the 5 p.m. show and that “I avoid confrontation like nobody’s business.” As to why he’s moving on, Beck explains: “Paul Revere did not get up on the horse and say, ha, I’m going to do this for the rest of my life.” No, says Beck, “He got off the horse at some point and fought in the revolution. Then he went back to silversmithing.”
Later he looks into the camera and warns assures his viewers, “We will find each other.”
I have little idea of what Beck was trying to say—maybe I needed a pill to help—but the segment helped explain why this guy has lost his place on TV.

Glenn Beck? I sort of expect he will turn up at Tea Party rallies and Republican campaign events, and that he will start implying that he was forced off the air by some sort of plot. Probably he won't directly attack the people at Fox, probably it will involve Muslims and Jews, socialists, and all the usual suspects.
#1 Posted by Christopher Hobe Morrison, CJR on Thu 7 Apr 2011 at 01:28 PM
Karma....negativity and hate will always come back and eat itself. America does not need to hear his bigotry and hatred, especially when it is done for money and nothing else.
#2 Posted by KeithG, CJR on Thu 7 Apr 2011 at 04:49 PM
When I was a kid I lived in Utah, and the Boy Scouts was taken over by Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints (FLDS Church). This, so called religion, practices underage polygamy, they send the boys off on missions to divide the underage sisters among the dirty old men of the clan. Now when these underage girls get pregnant, these same dirty old men, send them to the state to get their welfare checks . You should see some of the palace homes that are paid with welfare checks (not on just one of course). By the way this is the newest religion that was made right here in United States of America, I guess their also in AZ, CA, NM, TX, NV, CO, OK.
Glenn Beck’s comments on Japan as being a sign from GOD is trash talk, kicking them when they are down, would he say the same if a terrible thing happened to himself or his family? When someone hides behind religion to do or say something we know is wrong we should stand up and point it out (right the Wrong).
Someone should question Glenn Beck if this was a sign from GOD or just stuff that happens.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9iisl-xH3Xs
#3 Posted by Montana, CJR on Fri 8 Apr 2011 at 02:52 PM
The polygamist branch of Mormonism is awful in my opinion. Because they don’t take on women who are adult and have choices, they prey on children who then grow up knowing no other way. It’s child abuse, plain and simple to me.
I agree with your comments regarding Beck.
#4 Posted by Sherry, CJR on Sat 9 Apr 2011 at 01:50 PM
I hope nobody assumes that the FLDS church is the same thing as the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Days Saints (LDS Church) based on the last two comments. The Fundamentalists are a small group who left the LDS church in the 1800s when they stopped practicing polygamy. The fundamentalists do not send the boys off on missions. The original LDS Church encourages both their young men and young women to serve missions. Although on a much smaller scale this would be like mixing up Protestants and Catholics.
#5 Posted by Theo Kipling, CJR on Tue 26 Apr 2011 at 07:55 PM