In The Washington Post this morning, reporter Perry Bacon Jr. wrote what may be the single worst campaign ‘08 piece to appear in any American newspaper so far this election cycle.
In the front-page piece, Bacon muses over how the chances of Barack Obama getting elected president might be affected by the fact that he’s not Muslim. Seriously. To build his case, Bacon stumbles artlessly through all manner of rumor, innuendo, and xenophobic smear—never bothering to refute any of it, even though there is plenty of well-documented evidence to knock down much of this stuff. Bacon kicks the whole sorry mess off with the unsubstantiated statement that:
In his speeches and often on the Internet, the part of Sen. Barack Obama’s biography that gets the most attention is not his race but his connections to the Muslim world.
Who, exactly, gives this the most attention?
Further down in the piece, we’re given the evidence for Bacon’s assertion: selected quotes from a variety of right-wing nut jobs who traffic in sleazy online character assassination, and who don’t bother with reporting—intellectually honest or otherwise—when rumor and lies will suffice. Specifically, the charge that Obama was educated at a Muslim madrassa while living in Indonesia as a boy. Bacon broaches the subject when referring to “an early rumor about Obama’s faith” that came from the far right-wing Insight.com Web site last year. (The rumor has since been thoroughly debunked.) We’ll let Bacon hang himself on this one:
The Insight article said Obama had “spent at least four years in a so-called madrassa, or Muslim seminary, in Indonesia.” It attributed this detail to background information the Clinton campaign had been collecting.
After Obama denied the rumor, Jeffrey Kuhner, Insight’s editor, said Obama’s “concealment and deception was to be the issue, not so much his Muslim heritage,” and he suggested that the source of the madrassa rumor was the Clinton campaign. The Clinton campaign denied the charge.
Human Events, another conservative magazine, published on its Web site a package of articles called “Barack Obama Exposed.” One of them was titled “The First Muslim President?”
Robert Spencer, a conservative activist, wrote in Human Events that “given Obama’s politics, it will not be hard to present him internationally as someone who understands Islam and Muslims, and thus will be able to smooth over the hostility between the Islamic world and the West — our first Muslim President.”
Conservative talk-show hosts have occasionally repeated the rumor, with Michael Savage noting Obama’s “background” in a “Muslim madrassa in Indonesia” in June, and Rush Limbaugh saying in September that he occasionally got “confused” between Obama and Osama bin Laden. Others repeatedly use the senator’s middle name, Hussein.
Problem is, none of this is true, though Bacon never gets around to telling us that. A quick Google search would have turned up a CNN story from January 2007—in which CNN sent a reporter to Indonesia to check out the school Obama attended—that completely debunks the madrassa rumor. Here’s what really galls: while Bacon rightly refers the madrassa story a “rumor,” he quotes enough sources to make it sound like maybe it’s more than that, and he never bothers to state unequivocally that it’s been proven false. This habit of reporters—perpetuating untruths by writing stories about the “phenomenon” of those untruths—drives us nuts. Was LexisNexis broken in the scant few minutes it must have taken him to write this story? If so, Bacon must have taken to Internet message boards to troll for xenophobic posts claiming that Obama is a Muslim. In addition to quoting Insight, which is owned by Sun Myung Moon’s Unification Church, and Michael Savage, who shouldn’t be taken seriously by anybody, Bacon wastes our time by quoting someone named Bryan Keelin of Charleston, South Carolina, who posted some nutty “Obama is a secret Muslim”-style screeds on various Web sites. Leaving no stone unturned, Bacon quotes Snopes.com, an Internet rumor site, for more on the Obama-as-Muslim story. Bacon then wraps up by tossing in a quote from an Obama adviser telling us that all’s fine, there’s nothing to worry about.
Oh, well, with that tidbit at the end Bacon achieved the all-important Balance, so all’s well in newspaper-land.
This pathetic story has no place on the front page—or any page—of a paper like the Post. If a worse campaign-related story comes out this year, we don’t want to see it.





"Bacon kicks the whole sorry mess off ..." That should be "Bacon kicks off the whole sorry mess ...". Aren't there any editors any more?
Speaking of which, who put Perry's rancid bacon in the paper today? And does WaPo have a media critic who will speak to that?
Posted by howiekurtznot
on Thu 29 Nov 2007 at 02:48 PM
Bacon never bothers to tell us the Muslim rumors aren't true?? In the SECOND sentence of the article, he states that Obama is a member of the United Church of Christ. It doesn't require much reading between the lines here to deduce that this is a Christian church, and that Obama, therefore, is a Christian. But apparently these nuances escape readers who are in a rush to cast vitriolic aspersions on working journalists.
Posted by journo76
on Thu 29 Nov 2007 at 07:56 PM
Describing Snopes as a "rumor site" is embarrassingly shoddy journalism. It would have been worthwhile for you to actually visit the site and learn something about it before mischaracterizing it in print. Just because Bacon was lazy in his description of the site doesn't excuse you from being lazy.
For the record, Snopes is indisputably the premier resource on the Internet for debunking urban legends, rumors, and Internet innuendo. Had you made the effort to visit the site, you would have seen that Snopes squarely and categorically destroys the rumor that Obama is a Muslim, citing considerable evidence in support of that debunking.
Posted by Tom_Tildrum
on Fri 30 Nov 2007 at 02:10 AM
Will somebody please pay attention to the underlying slant of this commentary? While the writer is decrying the Post article as one trying to create paranoia, it does not take too deep an understanding of social psychology to see that he too is suffering from the same malaise in his effort to justify that Barrack is a Christian, and NOT a Muslim.
There is no harm in accepting that Islam puts religion before the concept of 'Nation'. Simply translated, it threatens the concept of individual liberty that America treats as its first tenet of existence. Why not accept this fact once and for all so that you do not have to make efforts to be politically correct all the time?
Posted by Shreesh
on Fri 30 Nov 2007 at 02:07 PM
In the spirit of the last post, I wonder if both Paul and this Bacon guy are both giving too much attention to the belief that at one point in time Obama might have been a Muslim. And it shouldn't matter at all what Obama's religion is; this conversation shouldn't be happening. I too am upset that Bacon's piece was even in the paper. Maybe Paul could have added in that it doesn't matter what religion Obama practices and that Bacon shouldn't have written this stuff in the first place. Paul's post is happening because Perry Bacon wrote things and didn't back them up; he made assumptions and accepted facts at face value. So, in the end we should all stand with Paul because Bacon's piece was still bad journalism. Thanks.
Posted by dankix
on Fri 30 Nov 2007 at 03:43 PM
journo76: "In the SECOND sentence of the article, he states that Obama is a member of the United Church of Christ."
Ahh...he's a Christian NOW, or claims to be anyway, but WE know better. He is the vanguard of a Muslim take over of this great country and these crafty devils know that our CHRISTIAN nation would never elect one of "them" to run our country so he poses as a Christian. Many many years he's kept up this charade, but we know that he attended a “Muslim madrassa in Indonesia” and his father was a Muslim. His middle name is Hussein for Pete's sake.
journo76, if you are, as your name implies, a journalist I suggest you do a little investigation into the Muslim menace that Our Great Nation, lead by our Greatest President ever, faces. Listen to Rush, read Drudge, get out of your "Liberal" journalist mindset and OPEN YOUR EYES!
Posted by Henk
on Sat 1 Dec 2007 at 09:37 AM
To Henk @ 9:37
You are stupid and clearly uneducated. Support your paranoid assertions with evidence or facts. It is almost painful to read your post. To think, that there are people out there, that are just so, manifestly stupid. It makes me feel ashamed to be an American really.
OUR EYES ARE OPEN YOU DUMB HICK.
His father's middle name is Hussein. So? He had a grandfather who was Muslim. But he isn't Muslim. I had a classmate, in high school, with the last name Ali and he was raised Catholic. Some people of mixed ancestry, such as my friend, have religious names from a part of their ancestry, for a religion they do not practice.
What is this crazy talk about the "muslim vanguard taking over this country"?
HE IS NOT MUSLIM. HE HAS NEVER BEEN MUSLIM.
Posted by natty light
on Sat 1 Dec 2007 at 11:11 AM
I feel that this debate is now getting totally personal and defeats the very purpose of intellectual enquiry. The questions here are:
1. Should or not America / Americans vote for a person with muslim ancestry?
2. Is there a concept of a liberal muslim?
3. Can a muslim, or for that matter christian, hindu or buddhist, change his or her religion and truly become one with the new faith?
4. If yes (to question 3), who decides the desirability of one religion over the other?
5. If no (to question 3), is Bacon right in assuming what he is assuming?
We need truly liberated social psychologists to answer these questions for us, not reactions of lesser human beings (who can only raise questions based on their experiences). Please remember that America too has its share of creepy, crawlies (of all hues) but it is not politically correct to refer to them in polite conversation. So the final question is: Is America ready to think truly global or would it continue to simplistically slot humanity in silos of 'useful' and 'not useful'?
Posted by Shreesh
on Sat 1 Dec 2007 at 12:14 PM
Ths issue, for heaven's sake, is not whether or not a Muslim can be president. Ths issue is whether the Washington Post story on Obama and his alleged Muslim links is or is not a shoddy piece of journalism that puts the Post on about the same level as the National Enquirer.
The Post's own readers agree wholeheartedly with McLeary's assessment that the article was "the single worst campaign ‘08 piece to appear in any American newspaper so far this election cycle." For confirmation, access the Post's Ombudsman at www.washingtonpost.com then click "Opinion" and "Feedback." Read the public's scathing comments on the original story and on Ombudsman Howell's pathetic attempt to gloss over it. The Washington Post, simply, no longer enjoys the public's confidence as a credible, responsible newspaper.
Posted by Tom B.
on Mon 10 Dec 2007 at 06:00 AM
To check the factual, history of Barack Hussein Obama. Go computer then find out. enter: “Obama/Saul Alinski”, “Obama, Bill Ayers Bernardine Dohrn”, “Obama/Jerry Kellman”, “Obama/Pro-Palestinian Arab-American Group”, “Obama/Rashid Khalidi”, “Obama/Betrayal of Alice Palmer”, etc., etc.
We forget the euphoria of 1958-59-60, surrounding the quick rise of Castro. We were all euphoric and fully assured when Castro took over Cuba. Castro promised CHANGE. Castro…as with Marxist training fooled us all. This was to our loss and regret. Such a fine poster-boy as Obama was a guarantee of 80% to 90% of all black voters for starters…why not Obama?) The formula is working like a charm. “neighborhood organizer”. Job: listen to the people’s troubles and travails. dig for information and listen with a sympathetic ear and keep track of their annoyances, complaints and information. “RUB THE WOUNDS AND RESENTMENTS UNTIL THEY’RE RAW AND BRING ON MORE COMPLAINTS” AND THEN PROMISE“CHANGE”! It worked for Castro! In 1958-59-60. Castro’s spoke of freedom and great things to come for all the Cuban people. Castro promised “CHANGE” JUST THE SAME AS Obama is doing now! It was straight out of the writings of Karl Marx.the ambiguous word “CHANGE” became the “BIG LIE”. “Obama was a self proclaimed student of Karl Marx since he was a young boy in Hawaii and continued on with his beliefs and studies. He continued his preparation until he was an under graduate at Harvard and proudly displayed a Russian Communist Flag in his dorm room”.
Posted by mcneticbob on Fri 29 Aug 2008 at 06:43 PM
Henk, dude, journo 76 was clearly a sarcastic parody, pretty accurate too, you were troll-baited by him, but the scary bit is that mcneticbob is ACTUALLY a deranged and ignorant illiterate for REAL. Terrifying!
Posted by Fonofidl on Thu 20 Aug 2009 at 10:57 PM