Hillary Clinton’s eyes welled up at a campaign stop in New Hampshire today, and you can bet that her brief moment of emotion is going to be chewed over endlessly over the next 24 hours. In an early take on the “story,” the New York Times’ Patrick Healey and Marc Santora take the odd route of inserting the press themselves in their description of the moment:
“Some of us are right some of us are wrong,” she continued, firming up a bit — and sounding, some reporters felt, either angry or resentful about Senator Barack Obama. “Some of us are ready, and some of us are not. Some of us know what we’ll do on day one and some of us don’t.” (emphasis ours)
She sounded angry or resentful about Obama? That’s a fascinating bit of mind reading by the two Times scribes. We wonder what other tricks—other than being able to peer inside the private thoughts of politicians—they can do.


Recent Comments
-
Thimbles on
Audit notes: No more daily in New Orleans, McClatchy, private equity
(6)
-
Bobcanuck on
Medicare and the $500 billion bogeyman
(23)
-
Bobcanuck on
The new medical-credit racket
(3)
-
L.M. on
The Ford Foundation’s unprecedented grant to The Los Angeles Times
(4)
-
TotallyDaft on
Facebook fiasco
(1)
-
Mike H on
The Chicago Tribune lights up the flame-retardant industry
(10)
-
padikiller on
Broadcasters sue to keep political ad buy data offline
(4)
-
aebe on
What Warren Buffett sees in local newspapers
(7)
More